Literature DB >> 33818656

Patient-reported outcome measures for patients with nail conditions: a systematic review of the psychometric evidence.

Rakhshan Kamran1, Leah Algu2, Cameron F Leveille3, Claire R Stewart4, Khizar Abid2, Shari R Lipner5, Anne F Klassen6, Charlene Rae6.   

Abstract

Nail conditions have an impact on appearance, function, and quality of life of patients. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important tools for evaluating treatment success from the patient perspective. It is important to understand the quality of PROMs to help guide selection of appropriate tools. The aim of this study was to critically appraise the psychometric properties of nail-specific PROMs using COSMIN guidelines. A systematic review was conducted in May 2019 to identify development and validation articles for nail-specific PROMs. Abstracts and subsequent full-texts were screened by two reviewers for eligibility. Data were extracted for study characteristics and psychometric properties. The risk of bias checklist was completed, and ratings applied to psychometric properties as per COSMIN guidelines. Modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria were applied based on the risk of bias checklist to assess methodological quality. The review identified 3289 articles of which 430 full-text articles were screened, nine of which met eligibility criteria. Included papers were for seven PROMs and in total reported on 31of 49 possible measurement properties. Of the 31 measurement properties reported, nine (29%) were rated as insufficient or indeterminate. The modified GRADE methodological quality rating was low or very low for 16 (32.7%) measurement properties, and 18 (36.7%) measurement properties were not described by any PROM. Currently there are no nail-specific PROMS available that demonstrate adequate validity, reliability, or responsiveness, according to COSMIN guidelines. Further research is required to assess missing or insufficiently tested measurement properties in all the PROMs identified.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33818656     DOI: 10.1007/s00403-021-02222-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res        ISSN: 0340-3696            Impact factor:   3.017


  6 in total

1.  Projected values of cesium-137 body burdens in Anaktuvuk Pass Eskimos for the summer of 1965, based on findings in caribou muscle.

Authors:  J R Coleman
Journal:  Radiol Health Data Rep       Date:  1965-10

2.  COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

Authors:  L B Mokkink; H C W de Vet; C A C Prinsen; D L Patrick; J Alonso; L M Bouter; C B Terwee
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Modification of existing patient-reported outcome measures: qualitative development of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MDASI-MPM).

Authors:  Loretta A Williams; Meagan S Whisenant; Tito R Mendoza; Shireen Haq; Karen N Keating; Brian Cuffel; Charles S Cleeland
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  The new COSMIN guidelines confront traditional concepts of responsiveness.

Authors:  Felix Angst
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  State of the psychometric methods: patient-reported outcome measure development and refinement using item response theory.

Authors:  Angela M Stover; Lori D McLeod; Michelle M Langer; Wen-Hung Chen; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2019-07-30

6.  COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study.

Authors:  C B Terwee; C A C Prinsen; A Chiarotto; M J Westerman; D L Patrick; J Alonso; L M Bouter; H C W de Vet; L B Mokkink
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 4.147

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.