Xuehui Wu1,2,3, Xiaoliang Lan1,2, Wanming Hu4, Wanning Zhang1,2, Xiangmeng Lai1,2, Shaowan Xu1,2, Jiaoying Li1,5, Weihao Qiu1,2, Wei Wang6, Jianbiao Xiao1,2, Feifei Wang1,2, Yanqing Ding7,8, Li Liang9,10. 1. Department of Pathology, Nanfang Hospital and Basic Medical College, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China. 2. Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Tumor Pathology, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China. 3. Department of Pathology, The People's Hospital of China Three Gorges University, Yichang, 443000, Hubei Province, People's Republic of China. 4. Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China. 5. Department of Pathology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510280, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China. 6. General Hospital of Southern Theater Command, People's Liberation Army of China, Guangzhou, 510010, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China. 7. Department of Pathology, Nanfang Hospital and Basic Medical College, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China. dyq@fimmu.com. 8. Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Tumor Pathology, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China. dyq@fimmu.com. 9. Department of Pathology, Nanfang Hospital and Basic Medical College, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China. lli@fimmu.com. 10. Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Tumor Pathology, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China. lli@fimmu.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: CMTM6 is a novel key regulator of PD-L1. High expression of both CMTM6 and PD-L1 may predict the benefit of PD-1 axis blockade in lung cancer. We aimed to investigate the expression pattern of CMTM6 between mismatch repair-defective (dMMR) and mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues and assess its correlation with the response to PD-1/PD-L1 pathway blockade. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to analyze CMTM6 and PD-L1 expression and immune cell density in dMMR/pMMR CRC. Quantitative multiplex immunofluorescence (IF) was performed to detect CMTM6, PD-L1, CD4, CD8, CD68 and CD163 expression in CRC patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. RESULT: IHC analysis showed that CMTM6 and PD-L1 were both expressed in tumor cells (TCs) and invasion front immune cells (ICs). CMTM6 and PD-L1 expression and CD4+, CD8+, CD68+ or CD163+ cell density were significantly higher in dMMR CRC patients than in pMMR CRC patients. CMTM6 expression was positively correlated with PD-L1 expression and CD163+ M2 macrophage density in dMMR CRC. IF analysis showed that the coexpression rate of CMTM6/PD-L1 and the expression rate of CMTM6 in CD8+ T cells and CD163+ M2 macrophages were significantly increased in the group that exhibited clinical benefit. CMTM6 expression in M2 macrophages was identified as the best biomarker for predicting the responsiveness to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: CMTM6 expression in M2 macrophages may predict the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor response rate in CRC patients more accurately than dMMR/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) status. It can also identify pMMR CRC patients who could benefit from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.
BACKGROUND:CMTM6 is a novel key regulator of PD-L1. High expression of both CMTM6 and PD-L1 may predict the benefit of PD-1 axis blockade in lung cancer. We aimed to investigate the expression pattern of CMTM6 between mismatch repair-defective (dMMR) and mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues and assess its correlation with the response to PD-1/PD-L1 pathway blockade. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to analyze CMTM6 and PD-L1 expression and immune cell density in dMMR/pMMR CRC. Quantitative multiplex immunofluorescence (IF) was performed to detect CMTM6, PD-L1, CD4, CD8, CD68 and CD163 expression in CRCpatients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. RESULT: IHC analysis showed that CMTM6 and PD-L1 were both expressed in tumor cells (TCs) and invasion front immune cells (ICs). CMTM6 and PD-L1 expression and CD4+, CD8+, CD68+ or CD163+ cell density were significantly higher in dMMR CRCpatients than in pMMR CRCpatients. CMTM6 expression was positively correlated with PD-L1 expression and CD163+ M2 macrophage density in dMMR CRC. IF analysis showed that the coexpression rate of CMTM6/PD-L1 and the expression rate of CMTM6 in CD8+ T cells and CD163+ M2 macrophages were significantly increased in the group that exhibited clinical benefit. CMTM6 expression in M2 macrophages was identified as the best biomarker for predicting the responsiveness to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS:CMTM6 expression in M2 macrophages may predict the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor response rate in CRCpatients more accurately than dMMR/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) status. It can also identify pMMR CRCpatients who could benefit from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.
Authors: Jon Zugazagoitia; Yuting Liu; Maria Toki; John McGuire; Fahad Shabbir Ahmed; Brian S Henick; Richa Gupta; Scott N Gettinger; Roy S Herbst; Kurt A Schalper; David L Rimm Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2019-10-09 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Marian L Burr; Christina E Sparbier; Yih-Chih Chan; James C Williamson; Katherine Woods; Paul A Beavis; Enid Y N Lam; Melissa A Henderson; Charles C Bell; Sabine Stolzenburg; Omer Gilan; Stuart Bloor; Tahereh Noori; David W Morgens; Michael C Bassik; Paul J Neeson; Andreas Behren; Phillip K Darcy; Sarah-Jane Dawson; Ilia Voskoboinik; Joseph A Trapani; Jonathan Cebon; Paul J Lehner; Mark A Dawson Journal: Nature Date: 2017-08-16 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Riccardo Mezzadra; Chong Sun; Lucas T Jae; Raquel Gomez-Eerland; Evert de Vries; Wei Wu; Meike E W Logtenberg; Maarten Slagter; Elisa A Rozeman; Ingrid Hofland; Annegien Broeks; Hugo M Horlings; Lodewyk F A Wessels; Christian U Blank; Yanling Xiao; Albert J R Heck; Jannie Borst; Thijn R Brummelkamp; Ton N M Schumacher Journal: Nature Date: 2017-08-16 Impact factor: 49.962