| Literature DB >> 33818636 |
Logan Good1, Brooke Benner1, William E Carson2.
Abstract
Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a non-receptor kinase belonging to the Tec family of kinases. The role of BTK in B cell receptor signaling is well defined and is known to play a key role in the proliferation and survival of malignant B cells. Moreover, BTK has been found to be expressed in cells of the myeloid lineage. BTK has been shown to contribute to a variety of cellular pathways in myeloid cells including signaling in the NLRP3 inflammasome, receptor activation of nuclear factor-κβ and inflammation, chemokine receptor activation affecting migration, and phagocytosis. Myeloid cells are crucial components of the tumor microenvironment and suppressive myeloid cells contribute to cancer progression, highlighting a potential role for BTK inhibition in the treatment of malignancy. The increased interest in BTK inhibition in cancer has resulted in many preclinical studies that are testing the efficacy of using single-agent BTK inhibitors. Moreover, the ability of tumor cells to develop resistance to single-agent checkpoint inhibitors has resulted in clinical studies utilizing BTK inhibitors in combination with these agents to improve clinical responses. Furthermore, BTK regulates the immune response in microbial and viral infections through B cells and myeloid cells such as monocytes and macrophages. In this review, we describe the role that BTK plays in supporting suppressive myeloid cells, including myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) and tumor-associated macrophages (TAM), while also discussing the anticancer effects of BTK inhibition and briefly describe the role of BTK signaling and BTK inhibition in microbial and viral infections.Entities:
Keywords: BTK; Bruton’s tyrosine kinase; Myeloid-derived suppressor cells; Tumor-associated macrophage
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33818636 PMCID: PMC8019691 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-021-02908-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Immunol Immunother ISSN: 0340-7004 Impact factor: 6.968
Fig. 1An overview of the roles of BTK in myeloid cells. The processes highlighted in red boxes indicate roles of BTK signaling in myeloid cells that have been reported in human or mice in the setting of microbial infection and cancer. Details regarding each cellular process are outlined in the text. Abbreviations: BTK, Bruton’s tyrosine kinase; TLR, Toll-like receptors; MYD88, myeloid differentiation primary response 88; PLCγ2, phospholipase C gamma 2; NF-κB, nuclear factor-kappa B; NO, nitric oxide; IL-1β, interleukin 1 beta; IL-6, interleukin 6; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha; IFN, interferon
An overview of BTK and checkpoint inhibition combination clinical trials in solid malignancies
| Combination | Setting | Phase | NCI identifier | Recruitment status | Effect | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTK inhibitor | Checkpoint inhibitor | |||||
| Ibrutinib | Pembrolizumab | Advanced refractory colorectal cancers | I/II | NCT03332498 | Active, not recruiting | |
| Ibrutinib | Pembrolizumab | Stage III–IV melanoma that cannot be removed by surgery | II | NCT03021460 | Recruiting | |
| Ibrutinib | Pembrolizumab | Gastrointestinal and genitourinary tumors | I/II | NCT02599324 | Recruiting | |
| Ibrutinib | Nivolumab | Metastatic solid tumors | I | NCT03525925 | Active, not recruiting | |
| Ibrutinib | Nivolumab | Non-small cell lung cancer | II | NCT02950038 | Withdrawn | |
| Ibrutinib | Nivolumab | Previously treated metastatic kidney cancer | I/II | NCT02899078 | Recruiting | |
| Ibrutinib | Nivolumab | Recurrent/metastatic HNSCC | II | NCT03646461 | Recruiting | |
| Ibrutinib | Durvalumab | Relapsed or refractory solid tumors | I/II | NCT02403271 | Completed | 122 patients were enrolled and the combination had an acceptable safety profile. Overall response rates (complete or partial responses) were 2% for pancreatic cancer, 3% for breast cancer, and 0% for NSCLC |
| Acalabrutinib | Pembrolizumab | Advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer | II | NCT02362048 | Completed | 77 patients were enrolled (37 monotherapy; 40 combination therapy) and the combination was well tolerated. The overall response rate was 0% with monotherapy and 7.9% with combination therapy |
| Acalabrutinib | Pembrolizumab | Advanced non-small cell lung cancer | II | NCT02448303 | Completed | 31 patients and 28 patients were enrolled in the monotherapy and combination therapies, respectively, with overall response rates of 12.9% and 14.3% |
| Acalabrutinib | Pembrolizumab | Advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma | II | NCT02454179 | Completed | 37 patients and 30 patients were enrolled in the monotherapy and combination therapies, respectively, with overall response rates of 18.9% and 16.7% |
| Acalabrutinib | Pembrolizumab | Ovarian cancer | II | NCT02537444 | Completed | 35 patients and 33 patients were enrolled in the monotherapy and combination therapies, respectively, with overall response rates of 2.9% and 9.1% |
| Acalabrutinib | Pembrolizumab | Metastatic urothelial carcinoma | II | NCT02351739 | Completed | 31 patients and 34 patients were enrolled in the monotherapy and combination therapies, respectively, with overall response rates of 29% and 23.5% |