Beatriz Moreno-Milan1, Bill Breitbart2, Benjamin Herreros3, Karmele Olaciregui Dague4, María Cristina Coca Pereira3. 1. Department of Palliative Care, Hospital de la Fuenfria, Cercedilla, Madrid, Spain. 2. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY. 3. Instituto de Ética Clínica Francisco Vallés, Universidad Europea de Madrid Campus de Villaviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain. 4. Epileptology Department, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Traditionally, the psychological well-being of healthcare workers has been taken for granted - it has even been considered a part of the requirements that were demanded of them. When these professionals have experienced suffering and psychological depletion, they have been held accountable for this suffering, adopting an individualistic and reductionist viewpoint focused only on the professional. This approach has become obsolete due to its proven ineffectiveness, especially from an ethics of responsibility and organization viewpoint. CONTEXT: The psychological well-being of the healthcare worker (and its opposites: suffering, exhaustion, and disenchantment) is advantageous to the professional's commitment to the institution, to their work performance, and to their personal life. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to reflect on the psychological suffering of the palliative care professional. METHOD: We will reflect on the three levels of responsibility that influence such suffering (micro-meso-macro-ethical; worker-environment-institution). RESULTS: We will propose a global strategy for the care of psychological well-being supported by scientific evidence and key references. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: We conclude with some contributions on what we have learned and still have to learn on this topic.
BACKGROUND: Traditionally, the psychological well-being of healthcare workers has been taken for granted - it has even been considered a part of the requirements that were demanded of them. When these professionals have experienced suffering and psychological depletion, they have been held accountable for this suffering, adopting an individualistic and reductionist viewpoint focused only on the professional. This approach has become obsolete due to its proven ineffectiveness, especially from an ethics of responsibility and organization viewpoint. CONTEXT: The psychological well-being of the healthcare worker (and its opposites: suffering, exhaustion, and disenchantment) is advantageous to the professional's commitment to the institution, to their work performance, and to their personal life. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to reflect on the psychological suffering of the palliative care professional. METHOD: We will reflect on the three levels of responsibility that influence such suffering (micro-meso-macro-ethical; worker-environment-institution). RESULTS: We will propose a global strategy for the care of psychological well-being supported by scientific evidence and key references. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: We conclude with some contributions on what we have learned and still have to learn on this topic.
Authors: Michael R Oreskovich; Tait Shanafelt; Lotte N Dyrbye; Litjen Tan; Wayne Sotile; Daniel Satele; Colin P West; Jeff Sloan; Sonja Boone Journal: Am J Addict Date: 2015-01
Authors: Arif H Kamal; Janet H Bull; Steven P Wolf; Keith M Swetz; Tait D Shanafelt; Katherine Ast; Dio Kavalieratos; Christian T Sinclair Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2019-11-26 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Thomas G Kannampallil; Charles W Goss; Bradley A Evanoff; Jaime R Strickland; Rebecca P McAlister; Jennifer Duncan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-08-06 Impact factor: 3.240