Literature DB >> 3381829

On sample-size and power calculations for studies using confidence intervals.

S Greenland1.   

Abstract

A recent trend in epidemiologic analysis has been away from significance tests and toward confidence intervals. In accord with this trend, several authors have proposed the use of expected confidence intervals in the design of epidemiologic studies. This paper discusses how expected confidence intervals, if not properly centered, can be misleading indicators of the discriminatory power of a study. To rectify such problems, the study must be designed so that the confidence interval has a high probability of not containing at least one plausible but incorrect parameter value. To achieve this end, conventional formulas for power and sample size may be used. Expected intervals, if properly centered, can be used to design uniformly powerful studies but will yield sample-size requirements far in excess of previously proposed methods.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3381829     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114945

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  12 in total

1.  Confidence intervals and sample sizes: don't throw out all your old sample size tables.

Authors:  L E Daly
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-02-09

2.  Changes in smoking prevalence in 8 countries of the former Soviet Union between 2001 and 2010.

Authors:  Bayard Roberts; Anna Gilmore; Andrew Stickley; David Rotman; Vladimir Prohoda; Christian Haerpfer; Martin McKee
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Statistical Primer for Athletic Trainers: Understanding the Role of Statistical Power in Comparative Athletic Training Research.

Authors:  Monica R Lininger; Bryan L Riemann
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Clinical and statistical issues in therapeutic equivalence trials.

Authors:  E Garbe; J Röhmel; U Gundert-Remy
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  A Multicenter Longitudinal Study of Hospital-Onset Bacteremia: Time for a New Quality Outcome Measure?

Authors:  Clare Rock; Kerri A Thom; Anthony D Harris; Shanahan Li; Daniel Morgan; Aaron M Milstone; Brian Caffo; Manjari Joshi; Surbhi Leekha
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.254

6.  Changes in smoking prevalence in Russia, 1996-2004.

Authors:  M Bobak; A Gilmore; M McKee; R Rose; M Marmot
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Patterns of infection and day care utilization and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Authors:  J P Neglia; M S Linet; X O Shu; R K Severson; J D Potter; A C Mertens; W Wen; J H Kersey; L L Robison
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  A sample size planning approach that considers both statistical significance and clinical significance.

Authors:  Bin Jia; Henry S Lynn
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Genetic modulation of lipid profiles following lifestyle modification or metformin treatment: the Diabetes Prevention Program.

Authors:  Toni I Pollin; Tamara Isakova; Kathleen A Jablonski; Paul I W de Bakker; Andrew Taylor; Jarred McAteer; Qing Pan; Edward S Horton; Linda M Delahanty; David Altshuler; Alan R Shuldiner; Ronald B Goldberg; Jose C Florez; Paul W Franks
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 10.  Basic concepts for sample size calculation: Critical step for any clinical trials!

Authors:  K K Gupta; J P Attri; A Singh; H Kaur; G Kaur
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.