Thioflavin T fluorescence is a gold standard probe for the detection of amyloid fibrils. Herein, we showed that mature amyloid fibrils incubated with polyphenol epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) present a fast reduction of the thioflavin T fluorescence, which is not related to remodeling activity. We propose the use of the pentameric thiophene fluorescence for monitoring the polyphenol remodeling activity.
Thioflavin T fluorescence is a gold standard probe for the detection of amyloid fibrils. Herein, we showed that mature amyloid fibrils incubated with polyphenol epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) present a fast reduction of the thioflavin T fluorescence, which is not related to remodeling activity. We propose the use of the pentameric thiophene fluorescence for monitoring the polyphenol remodeling activity.
Accumulation of amyloid
fibrils is the hallmark of amyloid diseases
responsible for about one in a thousand deaths in developed countries.[1] Among these often-fatal diseases are Alzheimer’s
and Parkinson’s diseases, type 2 diabetes, and several other
amyloidosis.[1] Amyloid fibrils share a typical
conformation rich in cross-β structures formed by intertwined
layers of β-sheets extending parallel to the fibril axis.[2] Part of the main structural features of the amyloid
fold extracted from in vivo patients can be recapitulated by in vitro
aggregates of purified recombinant amyloidogenic proteins.[3] This phenomenon helps the study of molecular
mechanisms related to amyloid aggregation.[4] Moreover, the study of amyloid aggregation in vitro allowed the
discovery, by high throughput screening, of small molecules to block
the amyloid aggregation or disassemble the preformed mature amyloid
fibrils.[5] Several antiamyloidogenic small
molecules are currently under investigation and clinical trials,[6] among them is epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG)
(Figure S1A), the main catechin of green
tea.[7] EGCG interacts directly with several
amyloidogenic proteins in vitro, blocking the fibrillization process
and driving the remodeling of mature fibrils.[5,8−11] The activity of EGCG against amyloidogenic proteins was extensively
investigated by the use of several biochemical and biophysical techniques
such as nuclear magnetic resonance,[12] Raman
spectroscopy,[13] transmission electron microscopy,[14] atomic force microscopy,[15] among others.[16] However, the
most used approach to detect amyloid formation and disassembly in
vitro is the fluorescence of thioflavin T (ThT) (Figure S1B).[17] ThT is a benzothiazole
salt widely used to visualize and quantify the amyloid fold both in
vivo and in vitro.[18] The molecular mechanism
to explain the increase in the fluorescence emission of ThT upon amyloid
binding is controversial,[19−21] but several studies point to
the restriction of the free rotation of ThT rings.[22] Even after being a gold standard probe to quantify amyloid
in vitro, ThT fluorescence presents some critical limitations such
as specificity,[23] interference with aggregation
kinetics,[24] and the dependence on the ionic
strength of the solution utilized.[18] Quantification
of β-Sheet Amyloid Fibril Structures with Thioflavin T. Methods Enzymol.. 1999 ">25] Other
groups and ourselves have presented evidence that EGCG competes with
ThT for some amyloid binding sites.[10,26] Luminescent-conjugated
polythiophenes have been used to study protein aggregates in vitro,
in situ, and in vivo.[27] Among the conjugated
polythiophenes, pentameric thiophene (pentameric formyl thiophene
acetic acid (PFTAA), Figure S1C) exhibits
conformation-dependent spectral properties,[27] and when immobilized into agarose beads, it was able to pull down
amyloid aggregates.[28] Herein, we compare
the ThT and PFTAA fluorescence as a readout of the EGCG remodeling
activity against mature amyloid fibrils.
Results and Discussion
The protein used as a model herein was recombinant mature amyloid
fibrils of alpha-synuclein (α-synuclein), the main protein related
to Parkinson’s disease. The mature fibrils of α-synuclein
were characterized by transmission electron microscopy and circular
dichroism (Figure S2A,B, respectively).
We observed an immediate decrease in ThT (20 μM) fluorescence
when α-synuclein fibrils (5 μM) were incubated with EGCG
(30 μM) (Figure B, time 0 h, wash −). As reported before,[10] we took advantage of a methodology that allows us to quantify
the ThT fluorescence after performing a series of fibril centrifugations
and washes to remove any soluble EGCG before each ThT measurement
(Figure A). We observed
that the ThT fluorescence of fibrils incubated with EGCG followed
by the centrifugation/wash protocol returns to the same level as that
of untreated fibrils (Figure B, time 0 h, wash +).
Figure 1
Effect of EGCG on the ThT and PFTAA fluorescence
of α-synuclein
amyloid fibrils. (A) Experimental scheme of the centrifugation/wash
protocol. (B) ThT fluorescence or (C) PFTAA fluorescence of the samples
incubated for 0 or 24 h in the absence or presence of EGCG. The use
of the centrifugation/wash protocol is denoted by (+). The buffer
used for all assays was 50 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl
(25 °C). [α-synuclein] = 5 μM and [EGCG] = 30 μM.
For the ThT fluorescence, the ThT concentration used was 20 μM,
Ex: 450 nm, and Em: 477 nm. For the PFTAA fluorescence, the PFTAA
concentration used was 20 μM, Ex: 450 nm, and Em: 550 nm. Transmission
electron microscopy of α-synuclein amyloid fibrils incubated
in the absence (D) or presence of EGCG for 0 (E) or 24 h (F). Bar
= 500 nm.
Effect of EGCG on the ThT and PFTAA fluorescence
of α-synuclein
amyloid fibrils. (A) Experimental scheme of the centrifugation/wash
protocol. (B) ThT fluorescence or (C) PFTAA fluorescence of the samples
incubated for 0 or 24 h in the absence or presence of EGCG. The use
of the centrifugation/wash protocol is denoted by (+). The buffer
used for all assays was 50 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl
(25 °C). [α-synuclein] = 5 μM and [EGCG] = 30 μM.
For the ThT fluorescence, the ThT concentration used was 20 μM,
Ex: 450 nm, and Em: 477 nm. For the PFTAA fluorescence, the PFTAA
concentration used was 20 μM, Ex: 450 nm, and Em: 550 nm. Transmission
electron microscopy of α-synuclein amyloid fibrils incubated
in the absence (D) or presence of EGCG for 0 (E) or 24 h (F). Bar
= 500 nm.On one side, after 24 h incubation,
even after the centrifugation/wash
protocol, the ThT fluorescence of EGCG treated fibrils remains low
(Figure B, time 24
h, wash +). We confirmed by transmission electron microscopy that
fast incubation (time 0 h) with EGCG causes no morphological changes
into the amyloid fold (compare Figure D with 1E). In contrast, after
24 h incubation, an intense amyloid fibril disaggregation remodeling
activity was observed (Figure F). These data suggest that the ThT fluorescence of amyloid
fibrils at zero time point does not reflect the reality when EGCG
is added into the solution. A different scenario was observed when
the ThT probe was replaced by PFTAA (Figure C). The PFTAA fluorescence was not affected
by EGCG incubation at zero time point (Figure C, time 0 h, wash −). Next, we incubated
α-synuclein fibrils (10 μM) with ThT or PFTAA (20 μM)
and performed the titration of EGCG (Figure ). We observed a dose–response decrease
in ThT fluorescence immediately after incubation with EGCG (Figure A). On the other
side, the presence of EGCG does not interfere with the fluorescence
of PFTAA (Figure B,C).
As expected, this fast incubation, which was about 5 min considering
the sample manipulation, is insufficient to cause morphological changes
in α-synuclein fibrils (compare Figure D with 2E). It is
important to note that the increase in the fluorescence of ThT after
incubation with amyloid fibrils is much higher when compared with
PFTAA (1000-fold vs 4-fold, compare the black vs green spectra of Figure A,B). However, as
pointed herein, a probe with high sensitivity does not mean that it
is superior to others. We performed EGCG titration in a similar way
as described in Figure , keeping the same concentration of α-synuclein fibrils but
this time changing the concentration of ThT (Figure A) or PFTAA (Figure B). Again, all experiments were performed
at zero time point incubation. Surprisingly, when low concentrations
of ThT were used, the reduction of the ThT fluorescence was prevented
upon EGCG incubation (Figure A, compare circles with inverted triangles). A possible explanation
for this observation may be related to the existence of more than
one ThT binding site with different affinities in α-synuclein
fibrils. At low ThT concentrations, the first binding site with higher
affinity is occupied, and EGCG cannot bind to this site. Only with
higher ThT concentrations, the second binding site is occupied, being
susceptible to EGCG competition. Another hypothesis is that EGCG disrupts
the micelles of ThT formed only at high concentrations of ThT.[29] It was showed by Roy and colleagues through
NMR that EGCG binds to the same site as ThT into amyloid fibrils.[26] Probably this feature responds to the immediate
reduction of ThT upon EGCG incubation.
Figure 2
Titration of EGCG at
α-synuclein amyloid fibrils monitored
by ThT or PFTAA. Mature α-synuclein amyloid fibrils (10 μM)
were incubated with 20 μM ThT (A) or PFTAA (B), and the fluorescence
was measured (green spectra). A titration of EGCG ranging from 5 to
25 μM was performed, and the fluorescence of ThT or PFTAA was
measured immediately. As a negative control, no fibrils were added
to the ThT or PFTAA solution (black spectra). Panel C presents the
area of each spectrum at increasing EGCG concentrations.
Figure 3
Titration of amyloidogenic probes at α-synuclein amyloid
fibrils monitored incubated with EGCG. Mature α-synuclein amyloid
fibrils (10 μM) incubated with different concentrations of ThT
(A) or PFTAA (B) were incubated with increasing concentrations of
EGCG, and their fluorescence was measured at zero time point.
Titration of EGCG at
α-synuclein amyloid fibrils monitored
by ThT or PFTAA. Mature α-synuclein amyloid fibrils (10 μM)
were incubated with 20 μM ThT (A) or PFTAA (B), and the fluorescence
was measured (green spectra). A titration of EGCG ranging from 5 to
25 μM was performed, and the fluorescence of ThT or PFTAA was
measured immediately. As a negative control, no fibrils were added
to the ThT or PFTAA solution (black spectra). Panel C presents the
area of each spectrum at increasing EGCG concentrations.Titration of amyloidogenic probes at α-synuclein amyloid
fibrils monitored incubated with EGCG. Mature α-synuclein amyloid
fibrils (10 μM) incubated with different concentrations of ThT
(A) or PFTAA (B) were incubated with increasing concentrations of
EGCG, and their fluorescence was measured at zero time point.Finally, we performed a kinetics experiment measuring
the ThT or
PFTAA (20 μM) fluorescence incubating mature α-synuclein
fibrils (5 μM) in the absence or presence of EGCG (30 μM)
for 4 h (Figure ).
For both probes, the fibrils incubated in the absence of EGCG showed
a slight reduction in the fluorescence (30 %) that is usually observed
in plate reader experiments due to adsorption to the plastic surface
multiwell plates (Figure , open symbols).[30] The incubation
with EGCG caused a fast reduction in the ThT fluorescence (Figure , hatched circles).
The PFTAA probe allowed us to observe that the remodeling activity
of EGCG takes place approximately after 1 h incubation and occurs
during the following hours of the experiment (Figure , hatched squares).
Figure 4
Kinetics of α-synuclein
amyloid fibril remodeling monitored
by ThT or PFTAA fluorescence incubated with EGCG. α-synuclein
amyloid was incubated in the absence (open symbols) or presence of
EGCG (hatched symbols) at 37 °C, and the ThT (circles) or PFTAA
(squares) fluorescence was monitored according to the time. [α-synuclein]
= 5 μM and [EGCG] = 30 μM. For the ThT fluorescence, the
ThT concentration used was 20 μM, Ex: 450 nm, and Em: 477 nm.
For the PFTAA fluorescence, the PFTAA concentration used was 20 μM,
Ex: 450 nm, and Em: 550 nm.
Kinetics of α-synuclein
amyloid fibril remodeling monitored
by ThT or PFTAA fluorescence incubated with EGCG. α-synuclein
amyloid was incubated in the absence (open symbols) or presence of
EGCG (hatched symbols) at 37 °C, and the ThT (circles) or PFTAA
(squares) fluorescence was monitored according to the time. [α-synuclein]
= 5 μM and [EGCG] = 30 μM. For the ThT fluorescence, the
ThT concentration used was 20 μM, Ex: 450 nm, and Em: 477 nm.
For the PFTAA fluorescence, the PFTAA concentration used was 20 μM,
Ex: 450 nm, and Em: 550 nm.As pointed in Figure , PFTAA showed a low increase in the fluorescence quantum yield upon
amyloid incubation, indicating that this probe has modest sensitivity.
Moreover, it was previously demonstrated that PFTAA changes the aggregation
kinetics of the Aβ1-42 peptide.[31] The second most used probe for amyloid detection
after ThT is the molecule Congo red. However, Congo red has even more
limitations than PFTAA. Usually, aggregation kinetics experiments
must be performed in the absence of Congo red since this probe blocks
the amyloidogenic aggregation of most proteins.[32] Moreover, it was demonstrated that amyloid incubated with
EGCG for 24 h induced a red shift absorbance of Congo red that was
almost identical to fibrils without EGCG.[33]Why do ThT and PFTAA have different amyloid fibril binding
modes?
To definitively answer this important question, detailed atomic models
of ThT, PFTAA, and EGCG bound to mature fibrils are necessary. However,
some clues can be gathered from biding experiments. It was shown through
structural simulations that the ThT binding into Aβ peptide
aggregates occurred in two different binding sites.[34] It was subsequentially suggested that a surface binding
mode and a channel insertion binding mode of ThT to amyloid fibrils[20] can result in different spectroscopic properties.
Most ThT binding occurs by surface contact stabilized by ionic interactions,
allowing fast relaxation, and consequently, a low fluorescence quantum
yield. Fewer ThT molecules interact with amyloid fibrils through a
channel insertion mode, where hydrophobic interactions are the dominant
forces. The channel insertion binding mode represents the strongest
emissive population of ThT.[20] In other
words, the hydrophobic interactions play a major role in the observed
increase in the ThT fluorescence upon amyloid binding. In contrast,
ionic interactions between the anionic carboxyl groups of PFTAA and
the cationic ε-amino groups of the side chain of amino acids
seem to be determinant PFTAA binding.[35,36] Bieschke and
colleagues showed that the gallate moiety of EGCG (D ring, Figure S2A) is critical for the efficient amyloid
remodeling activity.[8] We previously showed
that EGCG oxidation drives amyloid remodeling by hydrophobic interactions.[10] Together, these pieces of evidence suggest that
the hydrophobic interactions are the main determinants for EGCG amyloid
binding and remodeling. We hypothesize that EGCG and ThT compete for
the hydrophobic pockets present in the amyloid structure. On the other
side, EGCG poses no competition to PFTAA since this probe binds to
amyloid fibrils mainly by ionic interactions.We conclude that
the fast initial decrease of the ThT fluorescence
from mature amyloid fibrils incubated with EGCG is an artifact and
cannot be interpreted as remodeling activity. We speculate that EGCG
competes with ThT for binding pockets of mature fibrils. We anticipate
that this artifact is not restricted to polyphenolEGCG since we observed
this feature with diverse other small molecules (data not shown).
To address this issue, we suggest some alternatives: (i) the use of
the centrifugation/wash protocol since most amyloid fibrils are easily
pelleted by centrifugation; (ii) the use of the PFTAA probe; (iii)
the use of ThT at low concentrations; and (iv) the use of other techniques,
for example, transmission electron microscopy, to follow the remodeling
activity of polyphenolic compounds or any other small molecule.
Methods
EGCG
The EGCG (Sigma-Aldrich) degree of purity was
evaluated through a reversed-phase chromatography system with a binary
gradient of elution and showed >95 % purity. Its identity was confirmed
by electrospray-ion trap mass spectrometry (Bruker Amazon SL model)
as described previously.[11]
Thioflavin
T (ThT)
ThT was purchased from Sigma and
diluted in ultrapure water to a final concentration of 2 mM.
Pentameric
Thiophene (PFTAA) Synthesis
PFTAA was synthesized
as previously described.[27]
Preparation
of α-Synuclein
α-Synuclein
was purified as described previously.[37] Briefly, lyophilized α-synuclein was resuspended in phosphate-buffered
saline (PBS), filtered through a 0.22 μm filter, and centrifuged
using a Centricon with a 100 kDa cutoff. Then, the homogeneity of
the α-synuclein monomers was analyzed by size-exclusion chromatography
(Superdex 200 10/300 GE Healthcare), and the identity of α-synuclein
was confirmed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight
(MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (Bruker Autoflex Speed model). For size-exclusion
evaluation, 10 μL of each sample was injected at a 0.05 mL/min
flow rate, and elution was monitored by fluorescence (λex = 280 nm; λem = 320 nm). To obtain the
mature amyloid fibrils, monomeric α-synuclein was incubated
(140 μM) in PBS pH 7.4 with 0.02 % NaN3 with agitation
at 37 °C for 6 days. The fibrils were centrifuged (16 000
g for 10 min at 4 °C), the supernatant was removed, and the pellet
was stored at −20 °C until use.
Centrifugation/Wash Protocol
to Remove Unbound EGCG
Aliquots (200 μL) of α-synuclein
fibril (5 μM)
samples in the absence or presence of EGCG (30 μM) were centrifuged
(16 000 g for 10 min at 4 °C) to obtain a pellet. The
pellet was washed with 400 μL of 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH
7.4) and 150 mM NaCl, and the solution was centrifuged again (16 000
g for 10 min at 4 °C). The pellet was resuspended in 50 mM phosphate
buffer (pH 7.4) and 150 mM NaCl with 20 μM thioflavin T or 20
μM of pentameric thiophene.
Circular Dichroism
The measurements were performed
with a Jasco J-715 (Jasco Corp., Tokyo, Japan) spectropolarimeter
using a 0.01 mm path length quartz cuvette. CD spectra were acquired
using the following parameters: wavelength 260–290 nm, bandwidth
1 nm, speed 100 nm min–1, and response time 0.4
s. Spectra were recorded with an average of 3 scans, and the baseline
(buffer alone) was subtracted from the spectra. The sample was analyzed
in PBS (pH 7.4) with 0.02 % NaN3 at 25 °C.
Transmission
Electron Microscopy
The samples were prepared
as described by Azevedo and colleagues.[38]
Fluorescence Assays
The fluorescence assays described
in Figures –3 were performed in an ISS spectrofluorimeter with
a 1 nm slit width for excitation and emission. The amyloid fibrils
(5 or 10 μM) were diluted in PBS (pH 7.4). The fluorescence
increase was monitored at 25 °C, with λex =
450 nm and a scan of the emission spectrum from 470 to 570 nm for
ThT and with λex = 450 nm and a scan of the emission
spectrum from 470 to 680 nm for PFTAA. All experiments were performed
at 25 °C. The kinetic experiments (Figure ) were performed in 96-well plates (Costar
# 3631) at 37 °C with shaking (every 5 min for 30 s) containing
20 μM ThT or 20 μM PFTAA. The fluorescence intensity was
monitored using a SpectraMax Paradigm multimode microplate reader.
For ThT binding, the parameters were λex = 450 nm
and λem = 477 nm, while for PFTAA, they were λex = 450 nm and λem = 550 nm. The experiments
were repeated at least two times with reproducible results and the
bars represent the standard deviation. Figure shows the average of two independent experiments
each containing three biological points.
Authors: Estefania P C Azevedo; Humberto M Pereira; Richard C Garratt; Jeffery W Kelly; Debora Foguel; Fernando L Palhano Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2011-11-30 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Andreas Aslund; Christina J Sigurdson; Therése Klingstedt; Stefan Grathwohl; Tristan Bolmont; Dara L Dickstein; Eirik Glimsdal; Stefan Prokop; Mikael Lindgren; Peter Konradsson; David M Holtzman; Patrick R Hof; Frank L Heppner; Samuel Gandy; Mathias Jucker; Adriano Aguzzi; Per Hammarström; K Peter R Nilsson Journal: ACS Chem Biol Date: 2009-08-21 Impact factor: 5.100
Authors: Jun-Xia Lu; Wei Qiang; Wai-Ming Yau; Charles D Schwieters; Stephen C Meredith; Robert Tycko Journal: Cell Date: 2013-09-12 Impact factor: 41.582