Literature DB >> 33817331

Prognostic rules for predicting cognitive syndromes following stroke: A systematic review.

Bogna A Drozdowska1, Kris McGill1, Michael McKay2, Roisin Bartlam3, Peter Langhorne1, Terence J Quinn1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Stroke survivors are at high risk of developing cognitive syndromes, such as delirium and dementia. Accurate prediction of future cognitive outcomes may aid timely diagnosis, intervention planning, and stratification in clinical trials. We aimed to identify, describe and appraise existing multivariable prognostic rules for prediction of post-stroke cognitive status.
METHOD: We systematically searched four electronic databases from inception to November 2019 for publications describing a method to estimate individual probability of developing a cognitive syndrome following stroke. We extracted data from selected studies using a pre-specified proforma and applied the Prediction model Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) for critical appraisal.
FINDINGS: Of 17,390 titles, we included 10 studies (3143 participants), presenting the development of 11 prognostic rules - 7 for post-stroke cognitive impairment and 4 for delirium. Most commonly incorporated predictors were: demographics, imaging findings, stroke type and symptom severity. Among studies assessing predictive discrimination, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) in apparent validation ranged from 0.80 to 0.91. The overall risk of bias for each study was high. Only one prognostic rule had been externally validated.Discussion/conclusion: Research into the prognosis of cognitive outcomes following stroke is an expanding field, still at its early stages. Recommending use of specific prognostic rules is limited by the high risk of bias in all identified studies, and lack of supporting evidence from external validation. To ensure the quality of future research, investigators should adhere to current, endorsed best practice guidelines for conduct of prediction model studies. © European Stroke Organisation 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Stroke; cognition; cognitive impairment; delirium; dementia; prognosis; risk score

Year:  2021        PMID: 33817331      PMCID: PMC7995322          DOI: 10.1177/2396987321997045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Stroke J        ISSN: 2396-9873


  30 in total

Review 1.  Predictors and assessment of cognitive dysfunction resulting from ischaemic stroke.

Authors:  Rebecca F Gottesman; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 44.182

2.  Evaluation of the quality of prognosis studies in systematic reviews.

Authors:  Jill A Hayden; Pierre Côté; Claire Bombardier
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Occurrence Rate of Delirium in Acute Stroke Settings: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Robert C Shaw; Graham Walker; Emma Elliott; Terence J Quinn
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  What do we mean by validating a prognostic model?

Authors:  D G Altman; P Royston
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-02-29       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Prediction of poststroke dementia.

Authors:  J-H Lin; R-T Lin; C-T Tai; C-L Hsieh; S-F Hsiao; C-K Liu
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  The relationship between early post-stroke cognition and longer term activities and participation: A systematic review.

Authors:  Joseph A Mole; Nele Demeyere
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 2.868

7.  Towards a predictive model for post-stroke delirium.

Authors:  Milena Kostalova; Josef Bednarik; Adela Mitasova; Ladislav Dušek; Radka Michalcakova; Milos Kerkovsky; Tomas Kasparek; Martina Jezkova; Petra Balabanova; Stanislav Vohanka
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.

Authors:  Mourad Ouzzani; Hossam Hammady; Zbys Fedorowicz; Ahmed Elmagarmid
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2016-12-05

9.  Who Is Classified as Untestable on Brief Cognitive Screens in an Acute Stroke Setting?

Authors:  Emma Elliott; Bogna A Drozdowska; Martin Taylor-Rowan; Robert C Shaw; Gillian Cuthbertson; Terence J Quinn
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-14

10.  Profile of and risk factors for poststroke cognitive impairment in diverse ethnoregional groups.

Authors:  Jessica W Lo; John D Crawford; David W Desmond; Olivier Godefroy; Hanna Jokinen; Simin Mahinrad; Hee-Joon Bae; Jae-Sung Lim; Sebastian Köhler; Elles Douven; Julie Staals; Christopher Chen; Xin Xu; Eddie J Chong; Rufus O Akinyemi; Rajesh N Kalaria; Adesola Ogunniyi; Mélanie Barbay; Martine Roussel; Byung-Chul Lee; Velandai K Srikanth; Christopher Moran; Nagaendran Kandiah; Russell J Chander; Behnam Sabayan; J Wouter Jukema; Susanna Melkas; Timo Erkinjuntti; Henry Brodaty; Régis Bordet; Stéphanie Bombois; Hilde Hénon; Darren M Lipnicki; Nicole A Kochan; Perminder S Sachdev
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  2 in total

1.  European Stroke Organisation and European Academy of Neurology joint guidelines on post-stroke cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Terence J Quinn; Edo Richard; Yvonne Teuschl; Thomas Gattringer; Melanie Hafdi; John T O'Brien; Niamh Merriman; Celine Gillebert; Hanne Huyglier; Ana Verdelho; Reinhold Schmidt; Emma Ghaziani; Hysse Forchammer; Sarah T Pendlebury; Rose Bruffaerts; Milija Mijajlovic; Bogna A Drozdowska; Emily Ball; Hugh S Markus
Journal:  Eur Stroke J       Date:  2021-10-08

2.  Informing Patients with Acute Stroke About their Risk of Dementia: A Survey of UK Healthcare Professionals.

Authors:  Emily L Ball; Gillian E Mead; Eugene Y H Tang; Dorota Religa; Terence J Quinn; Susan D Shenkin
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.136

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.