| Literature DB >> 33817270 |
Junjie Zhang1,2,3,4, Ruiqi Pian2,3,4, Endian Yang4, Wei Zhou2,3,4, Qian He3,4, Xiaoyang Chen1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Artificial induction of polyploidy is widely used in breeding programmes to improve the agronomic traits. The drumstick tree (Moringa oleifera Lam.) has a range of potential commercial uses, as the vegetative organs have high nutritional, medicinal, and feed values. In the present study, in vitro tetraploidisation in drumstick tree was performed by treating leaf segments with colchicine and subsequently verifying the ploidy levels. For polyploidisation, explant survival and regeneration rates were affected more by exposure time than by colchicine concentration, and the highest polyploidisation efficiency was observed at 500 mg/L colchicine for 3 days, which yielded 21% tetraploids. The morphological characteristics and contents of seven fodder-related nutrients (crude protein, ether extract, ash, acid detergent fibre, neutral detergent fibre, calcium, and phosphorus) in the leaves and shoots were compared between tetraploid and diploid drumstick trees. The resulting tetraploids showed significantly enhanced leaf and stomatal size. In addition, the contents of seven fodder-related nutrients were higher, although to varying degrees, in tetraploids than in diploids. The results indicated that the tetraploid produced in this study exhibited superior agronomical traits and improved biomass yield than diploids, and may represent excellent raw materials for fodder to enhance biomass and nutrition.Entities:
Keywords: colchicine; drumstick tree; morphological characteristics; nutritional contents; tetraploid
Year: 2020 PMID: 33817270 PMCID: PMC7747515 DOI: 10.1515/biol-2020-0087
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Life Sci ISSN: 2391-5412 Impact factor: 0.938
Figure 1Chromosomes in the root tips of drumstick tree: (a) diploid, (b) chimeras, and (c) tetraploid.
Figure 2Comparison of morphology and stomata between diploid and tetraploid drumstick tree plants. (a) Plantlets of tetraploid (1) and diploid (2) drumstick tree. (b) Leaves of tetraploid (1) and diploid (2) drumstick tree. (c and e) Stomata of diploid plants. (d and f) Stomata of tetraploid plants. Bar = 50 µm (c and d) and 10 µm (e and f).
Morphological and stomatal comparisons of diploid and tetraploid drumstick tree
| Characteristics | Diploid | Tetraploid |
|---|---|---|
| Leaf length (cm) | 2.08 ± 0.05 | 2.95 ± 0.19 |
| Leaf width (cm) | 1.15 ± 0.04 | 2.37 ± 0.16 |
| Leaf shape index (leaf length/width) | 1.82 ± 0.03 | 1.26 ± 0.08 |
| Stomatal length (µm) | 27.10 ± 0.72 | 41.90 ± 0.64 |
| Stomatal density (N/mm2) | 151.73 ± 3.42 | 93.47 ± 1.49 |
Fodder-related quality comparisons (g/kg) in leaves of diploid and tetraploid drumstick tree
| Nutrition composition | Diploid | Tetraploid |
|---|---|---|
| Crude protein | 262.30 ± 29.91 | 325.94 ± 40.20 |
| Crude fat | 40.43 ± 4.73 | 45.69 ± 3.34 |
| Crude ash content | 90.61 ± 4.80 | 119.61 ± 6.57 |
| Acid detergent fibre | 128.98 ± 2.61 | 149.55 ± 1.08 |
| Neutral detergent fibre | 153.08 ± 12.78 | 187.82 ± 14.70 |
| Calcium | 16.42 ± 1.71 | 23.15 ± 1.94 |
| Phosphorus | 3.45 ± 0.52 | 4.68 ± 0.62 |
Effect of different exposure time of 100 mg/L colchicine treatment on shoot regeneration in drumstick tree
| Exposure time (days) | % explants regenerated shoots | Shoots per explant |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 82.43 ± 10.28a | 3.43 ± 0.62a |
| 3 | 32.0 ± 6.66b | 0.60 ± 0.14b |
| 6 | 16.74 ± 4.73bc | 0.36 ± 0.21b |
| 9 | 9.46 ± 4.02c | 0.12 ± 0.04b |
| 12 | 5.42 ± 3.33c | 0.04 ± 0.01b |
Mean values followed by the same letter in the same column are not significantly different from each other at the P ≤ 0.05 level, according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Effect of different colchicine concentration in vitro treatments on shoot regeneration in drumstick tree
| Colchicine (mg/L) | % explants regenerated shoots | Shoots per explant |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 82.43 ± 10.28a | 3.43 ± 0.62a |
| 100 | 32.0 ± 6.66b | 0.60 ± 0.14b |
| 250 | 21.67 ± 5.36bc | 0.49 ± 0.10bc |
| 500 | 17.50 ± 6.08bc | 0.43 ± 0.19bc |
| 1,000 | 6.67 ± 4.63c | 0.07 ± 0.05c |
Mean values followed by the same letter in the same column are not significantly different from each other at the P ≤ 0.05 level, according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Effect of different exposure time of 100 mg/L colchicine treatment on polyploid induction in drumstick tree
| Exposure time (days) | No. of plants examined | % individuals by ploidy level | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diploid | Chimeras | Tetraploid | ||
| 0 | 10 | 100a | 0c | 0c |
| 3 | 27 | 81.48 ± 7.62b | 14.81 ± 6.97ab | 3.70 ± 3.70b |
| 6 | 16 | 68.75 ± 11.97c | 25.0 ± 11.18ab | 6.25 ± 3.39b |
| 9 | 6 | 50.0 ± 22.36c | 33.33 ± 21.08a | 16.67 ± 5.94a |
| 12 | 2 | 100a | 0c | 0c |
Mean values followed by the same letter in the same column are not significantly different from each other at the P ≤ 0.05 level, according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Effect of different colchicine concentration in vitro treatments on polyploidy induction in drumstick tree
| Colchicine (mg/L) | No. of plants examined | % individuals by ploidy level | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diploid | Chimeras | Tetraploid | ||
| 0 | 10 | 100a | 0c | 0c |
| 100 | 27 | 81.48 ± 7.62b | 14.81 ± 6.97b | 3.70 ± 3.70c |
| 250 | 22 | 63.64 ± 10.50b | 27.27 ± 9.72a | 9.09 ± 6.27b |
| 500 | 19 | 52.63 ± 11.77c | 26.32 ± 10.38a | 21.05 ± 9.61a |
| 1,000 | 3 | 66.67 ± 33.33b | 33.33 ± 33.33a | 0c |
Mean values followed by the same letter in the same column are not significantly different from each other at the P ≤ 0.05 level, according to Duncan’s multiple range test.