| Literature DB >> 33817260 |
Do Manh Hao1,2, Do Trung Sy3, Dao Thi Anh Tuyet1, Le Minh Hiep1, Nguyen Tien Dat1, Do Thi Thu Huong1, Do Cong Thung1, Dang Hoai Nhon1, Tran Dinh Lan1,2, Nguyen Van Quan1,2.
Abstract
Lutraria rhynchaena Jonas, 1844 is of great commercial interest, but its reserves have dramatically declined over recent decades. Therefore, there is an urgent need of scientific basis to propose effective fishery management measures and improve artificial aquaculture of the clam. In this study, we investigated the distribution and density of L. rhynchaena, sediment characteristics, and established the clam's reproductive cycle through monthly observations from August 2017 to July 2018. The study results showed that distribution and density of clams are related to sediment types, and the sediment type of medium sand is likely the best benthic substrate for the clams. The spawning of clams occurred throughout the year with three spawning peaks in January, April and September. For the sustainable management of the clam resource in Cat Ba-Ha Long Bay, the fishery authorities can issue a ban on harvest of the clam in spawning peak months in January, April and September.Entities:
Keywords: Cat Ba-Ha Long Bay; Lutraria rhynchaena; density; distribution; reproductive cycle
Year: 2020 PMID: 33817260 PMCID: PMC7747507 DOI: 10.1515/biol-2020-0072
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Life Sci ISSN: 2391-5412 Impact factor: 0.938
Figure 1Sampling sites of L. rhynchaena Jonas, 1844 in Cat Ba-Ha Long Bay, Vietnam.
Figure 2Monthly variations of surface water temperature and salinity at study sites.
t- and p-values between each pair of monthly temperature based on monitoring result in Cat Ba-Ha Long Bay during 2017–2018 using t-test (α = 0.01)
| Aug-17 | Sep-17 | Oct-17 | Nov-17 | Dec-17 | Jan-18 | Feb-18 | Mar-18 | Apr-18 | May-18 | Jun-18 | Jul-18 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug-17 | ||||||||||||
| Sep-17 | 14/5 × 10−10 | |||||||||||
| Oct-17 | 17/5 × 10−11 | 8/2 × 10−06 | ||||||||||
| Nov-17 | 41/8 × 10−17 | 33/2 × 10−15 | 38/3 × 10−16 | |||||||||
| Dec-17 | 120/9 × 10−24 | 81/3 × 10−21 | 85/1 × 10−21 | 26/6 × 10−14 | ||||||||
| Jan-18 | 82/3 × 10−21 | 74/1 × 10−20 | 71/2 × 10−20 | 33/2 × 10−15 | 5/2 × 10−04 | |||||||
| Feb-18 | 127/4 × 10−24 | 103/8 × 10−23 | 58/4 × 10−19 | 17/5 × 10−11 | −3/5 × 10−03 | −5/10 × 10−05 | ||||||
| Mar-18 | 46/1 × 10−17 | 43/4 × 10−17 | 31/4 × 10−15 | 7/3 × 10−06 | −10/3 × 10−08 | −14/5 × 10−10 | −10/4 × 10−08 | |||||
| Apr-18 | 47/1 × 10−17 | 40/1 × 10−16 | 32/4 × 10−15 | −6/5 × 10−05 | −43/4 × 10−17 | −60/3 × 10−19 | −31/6 × 10−15 | −24/2 × 10−13 | ||||
| May-18 | 10/6 × 10−08 | 2/4 × 10−02 | −2/4 × 10−02 | −20/2 × 10−12 | −43/4 × 10−17 | −37/4 × 10−16 | −52/3 × 10−18 | −25/1 × 10−13 | −19/6 × 10−12 | |||
| Jun-18 | −10/6 × 10−08 | −21/2 × 10−12 | −24/3 × 10−13 | −58/4 × 10−19 | −137/1 × 10−24 | −154/2 × 10−25 | −100/1 × 10−22 | −65/8 × 10−20 | −82/2 × 10−21 | −13/2 × 10−09 | ||
| Jul-18 | −22/8 × 10−13 | −27/3 × 10−14 | −66/8 × 10−20 | −72/2 × 10−20 | −125/5 × 10−24 | −99/2 × 10−22 | −76/8 × 10−21 | −46/2 × 10−17 | −54/2 × 10−18 | −19/5 × 10−12 | −9/1 × 10−07 |
t- and p-values between each pair of monthly salinity based on the monitoring result in Cat Ba-Ha Long Bay during 2017–2018 using t-test (α = 0.01)
| Aug-17 | Sep-17 | Oct-17 | Nov-17 | Dec-17 | Jan-18 | Feb-18 | Mar-18 | Apr-18 | May-18 | Jun-18 | Jul-18 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug-17 | ||||||||||||
| Sep-17 | −20/3 × 10−12 | |||||||||||
| Oct-17 | −21/1 × 10−12 | −11/1 × 10−08 | ||||||||||
| Nov-17 | −23/4 × 10−13 | −14/7 × 10−10 | −11/2 × 10−08 | |||||||||
| Dec-17 | −19/9 × 10−12 | −11/1 × 10−08 | −9/2 × 10−07 | −2/2 × 10−02 | ||||||||
| Jan-18 | −16/6 × 10−11 | −10/4 × 10−08 | −8/2 × 10−06 | −2/1 × 10−01 | 0/8 × 10−01 | |||||||
| Feb-18 | −16/8 × 10−11 | −10/4 × 10−08 | −8/1 × 10−06 | −4/3 × 10−03 | −4/2 × 10−03 | −4/7 × 10−04 | ||||||
| Mar-18 | −20/4 × 10−12 | −12/5 × 10−09 | −10/8 × 10−08 | 4/2 × 10−02 | 1/6 × 10−01 | 0/9 × 10−01 | 4/1 × 10−03 | |||||
| Apr-18 | −26/8 × 10−14 | −14/6 × 10−10 | −7/8 × 10−06 | −7/2 × 10−03 | 4/5 × 10−04 | 3/4 × 10−03 | 5/1 × 10−04 | 5/3 × 10−04 | ||||
| May-18 | −31/4 × 10−15 | −11/1 × 10−08 | 2/3 × 10−02 | 9/2 × 10−07 | 8/9 × 10−07 | 7/5 × 10−06 | 8/1 × 10−06 | 9/4 × 10−07 | 11/2 × 10−08 | |||
| Jun-18 | −5/1 × 10−04 | 4/2 × 10−03 | 27/5 × 10−14 | 33/2 × 10−15 | 24/3 × 10−13 | 21/1 × 10−12 | 18/1 × 10−11 | 27/5 × 10−14 | 19/5 × 10−12 | 10/5 × 10−08 | ||
| Jul-18 | 5/3 × 10−04 | 19/6 × 10−12 | 26/8 × 10−14 | 25/1 × 10−13 | 20/2 × 10−12 | 18/2 × 10−11 | 17/4 × 10−11 | 21/1 × 10−12 | 26/9 × 10−14 | 25/1 × 10−13 | 8/2 × 10−06 |
Characteristics of sediment distribution and density of L. rhynchaena in Cat Ba-Ha Long Bay
| Sites |
|
|
| Sediment types | Sorting | Skewness | Density (Ind./100 m2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 708.10 | 2.98 | −0.15 | Coarse sand | Poorly sorted | Fine skewed | 6.9 |
| 2 | 581.50 | 3.92 | −0.24 | Coarse sand | Poorly sorted | Fine skewed | 26.3 |
| 3 | 6.30 | 6.03 | 0.14 | Fine silt | Very poorly sorted | Coarse skewed | 0.0 |
| 4 | 1560.80 | 2.67 | −0.03 | Very coarse sand + coral reef | Poorly sorted | Symmetrical | 22.2 |
| 5 | 399.40 | 3.77 | 0.36 | Medium sand | Poorly sorted | Very coarse skewed | 30.8 |
| 6 | 1560.90 | 2.67 | −0.04 | Very coarse sand + coral reef | Poorly sorted | Symmetrical | 24.7 |
| 7 | 6.40 | 6.01 | 0.14 | Fine silt | Very poorly sorted | Coarse skewed | 0.0 |
| 8 | 757.80 | 2.84 | −0.16 | Coarse sand | Poorly sorted | Fine skewed | 58.9 |
| 9 | 6.30 | 6.02 | 0.14 | Fine silt | Very poorly sorted | Coarse skewed | 0.0 |
| 10 | 665.60 | 3.41 | −0.07 | Coarse sand + coral reef | Poorly sorted | Symmetrical | 10.7 |
| 11 | 21.40 | 6.13 | −0.70 | Coarse silt | Very poorly sorted | Very fine skewed | 0.0 |
| 12 | 491.50 | 6.00 | −0.25 | Medium sand | Very poorly sorted | Fine skewed | 94.7 |
| 13 | 21.40 | 6.14 | −0.70 | Coarse silt | Very poorly sorted | Very fine skewed | 0.0 |
| 14 | 1176.70 | 4.77 | −0.33 | Very coarse sand | Very poorly sorted | Very fine skewed | 33.2 |
| 15 | 1154.50 | 4.95 | −0.37 | Very coarse sand + coral reef | Very poorly sorted | Very fine skewed | 28.0 |
| 16 | 5.20 | 5.11 | 0.16 | Fine silt | Very poorly sorted | Symmetrical | 0.0 |
t- and p-values between each pair of density groups of L. rhynchaena based on sampling locations using t-test (α = 0.01)
|
| First group | Second group | Third group | Fourth group | Fifth group | Sixth group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First group | ||||||
| Second group | 5.3/1.2 × 10−06 | |||||
| Third group | 12.7/4.2 × 10−15 | 7.2/1.2 × 10−08 | ||||
| Fourth group | 16.1/9.5 × 10−18 | 11.3/2.3 × 10−13 | 18.8/1.9 × 10−49 | |||
| Fifth group | 16.6/5.7 × 10−19 | 11.9/1.6 × 10−14 | 16.0/5.5 × 10−28 | 3.5/1.0 × 10−03 | ||
| Sixth group | 18.2/2.0 × 10−19 | 13.8/9.6 × 10−16 | 34.1/1.1 × 10−88 | 27.3/3.4 × 10−25 | 6.9/5.6 × 10−08 |
t- and p-values between each pair of density groups of L. rhynchaena based on sediment types using t-test (α = 0.01)
|
| First group | Second group | Third group | Fourth group | Fifth group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First group | |||||
| Second group | 6.2/1.3 × 10−08 | ||||
| Third group | 7.9/1.4 × 10−11 | 2.7/7.0 × 10−03 | |||
| Fourth group | 11.2/2.1 × 10−17 | 10.2/7.1 × 10−19 | 11.0/3.0 × 10−20 | ||
| Fifth group | 13.5/2.6 × 10−21 | 15.7/6.2 × 10−33 | 20.2/2.0 × 10−38 | 27.3/3.0 × 10−25 |
Figure 3Density of L. rhynchaena as a function of sediment type in the surveys (2017–2018). Error bars present standard deviation.
Figure 4Sex ratio of L. rhynchaena at Cat Ba-Ha Long Bay over the study period.