Literature DB >> 33817056

A systematic metadata harvesting workflow for analysing scientific networks.

Bilal H Butt1, Muhammad Rafi2, Muhammad Sabih3.   

Abstract

One of the disciplines behind the science of science is the study of scientific networks. This work focuses on scientific networks as a social network having different nodes and connections. Nodes can be represented by authors, articles or journals while connections by citation, co-citation or co-authorship. One of the challenges in creating scientific networks is the lack of publicly available comprehensive data set. It limits the variety of analyses on the same set of nodes of different scientific networks. To supplement such analyses we have worked on publicly available citation metadata from Crossref and OpenCitatons. Using this data a workflow is developed to create scientific networks. Analysis of these networks gives insights into academic research and scholarship. Different techniques of social network analysis have been applied in the literature to study these networks. It includes centrality analysis, community detection, and clustering coefficient. We have used metadata of Scientometrics journal, as a case study, to present our workflow. We did a sample run of the proposed workflow to identify prominent authors using centrality analysis. This work is not a bibliometric study of any field rather it presents replicable Python scripts to perform network analysis. With an increase in the popularity of open access and open metadata, we hypothesise that this workflow shall provide an avenue for understanding scientific scholarship in multiple dimensions.
© 2021 Butt et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Centrality measures; Citation network; Collaboration network; Crossref; Digital libraries; Ego network; Influence; Network analysis; OpenCitations; Python

Year:  2021        PMID: 33817056      PMCID: PMC7959659          DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PeerJ Comput Sci        ISSN: 2376-5992


  6 in total

1.  NETWORKS OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS.

Authors:  D J PRICE
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-07-30       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  SNAP: A General Purpose Network Analysis and Graph Mining Library.

Authors:  Jure Leskovec; Rok Sosič
Journal:  ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations' COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations.

Authors:  Alberto Martín-Martín; Mike Thelwall; Enrique Orduna-Malea; Emilio Delgado López-Cózar
Journal:  Scientometrics       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 3.238

4.  Betweenness and diversity in journal citation networks as measures of interdisciplinarity-A tribute to Eugene Garfield.

Authors:  Loet Leydesdorff; Caroline S Wagner; Lutz Bornmann
Journal:  Scientometrics       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.238

5.  Measuring researcher independence using bibliometric data: A proposal for a new performance indicator.

Authors:  Peter van den Besselaar; Ulf Sandström
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Early coauthorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers.

Authors:  Weihua Li; Tomaso Aste; Fabio Caccioli; Giacomo Livan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 14.919

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.