Literature DB >> 33816966

Immersive virtual environments and embodied agents for e-learning applications.

Isabel S Fitton1, Daniel J Finnegan2, Michael J Proulx3.   

Abstract

Massive Open Online Courses are a dominant force in remote-learning yet suffer from persisting problems stemming from lack of commitment and low completion rates. In this initial study we investigate how the use of immersive virtual environments for Power-Point based informational learning may benefit learners and mimic traditional lectures successfully. We examine the role of embodied agent tutors which are frequently implemented within virtual learning environments. We find similar performance on a bespoke knowledge test and metrics for motivation, satisfaction, and engagement by learners in both real and virtual environments, regardless of embodied agent tutor presence. Our results raise questions regarding the viability of using virtual environments for remote-learning paradigms, and we emphasise the need for further investigation to inform the design of effective remote-learning applications.
© 2020 Fitton et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Classroom; Distance learning; E-learning; Education; Immersive virtual environments; MOOC; Virtual reality

Year:  2020        PMID: 33816966      PMCID: PMC7924662          DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PeerJ Comput Sci        ISSN: 2376-5992


  8 in total

1.  G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Albert-Georg Lang; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-05

Review 2.  Promoting motivation with virtual agents and avatars: role of visual presence and appearance.

Authors:  Amy L Baylor
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Feature integration is unaffected by saccade landing point, even when saccades land outside of the range of regular oculomotor variance.

Authors:  Martijn J Schut; Nathan Van der Stoep; Jasper H Fabius; Stefan Van der Stigchel
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 4.  Bayesian Versus Orthodox Statistics: Which Side Are You On?

Authors:  Zoltan Dienes
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-05

5.  Development and impact of a massive open online course (MOOC) for antimicrobial stewardship.

Authors:  Jacqueline Sneddon; Gavin Barlow; Sally Bradley; Adrian Brink; Sujith J Chandy; Dilip Nathwani
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP.

Authors:  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Jonathon Love; Maarten Marsman; Tahira Jamil; Alexander Ly; Josine Verhagen; Ravi Selker; Quentin F Gronau; Damian Dropmann; Bruno Boutin; Frans Meerhoff; Patrick Knight; Akash Raj; Erik-Jan van Kesteren; Johnny van Doorn; Martin Šmíra; Sacha Epskamp; Alexander Etz; Dora Matzke; Tim de Jong; Don van den Bergh; Alexandra Sarafoglou; Helen Steingroever; Koen Derks; Jeffrey N Rouder; Richard D Morey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

7.  Facing reality: the growth of virtual reality and health sciences libraries.

Authors:  Susan Lessick; Michelle Kraft
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2017-10-01

8.  Ready student one: Exploring the predictors of student learning in virtual reality.

Authors:  J Madden; S Pandita; J P Schuldt; B Kim; A S Won; N G Holmes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.