Literature DB >> 33816945

Development of a valid and reliable software customization model for SaaS quality through iterative method: perspectives from academia.

Abdulrazzaq Qasem Ali1, Abu Bakar Md Sultan1, Abdul Azim Abd Ghani1, Hazura Zulzalil1.   

Abstract

Despite the benefits of standardization, the customization of Software as a Service (SaaS) application is also essential because of the many unique requirements of customers. This study, therefore, focuses on the development of a valid and reliable software customization model for SaaS quality that consists of (1) generic software customization types and a list of common practices for each customization type in the SaaS multi-tenant context, and (2) key quality attributes of SaaS applications associated with customization. The study was divided into three phases: the conceptualization of the model, analysis of its validity using SaaS academic-derived expertise, and evaluation of its reliability by submitting it to an internal consistency reliability test conducted by software-engineer researchers. The model was initially devised based on six customization approaches, 46 customization practices, and 13 quality attributes in the SaaS multi-tenant context. Subsequently, its content was validated over two rounds of testing after which one approach and 14 practices were removed and 20 practices were reformulated. The internal consistency reliability study was thereafter conducted by 34 software engineer researchers. All constructs of the content-validated model were found to be reliable in this study. The final version of the model consists of 6 constructs and 44 items. These six constructs and their associated items are as follows: (1) Configuration (eight items), (2) Composition (four items), (3) Extension (six items), 4) Integration (eight items), (5) Modification (five items), and (6) SaaS quality (13 items). The results of the study may contribute to enhancing the capability of empirically analyzing the impact of software customization on SaaS quality by benefiting from all resultant constructs and items. ©2020 Ali et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Content validity; Customization approaches; Iterative method; Model development; Reliability study; SaaS quality; Software as a service

Year:  2020        PMID: 33816945      PMCID: PMC7924678          DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PeerJ Comput Sci        ISSN: 2376-5992


  15 in total

Review 1.  A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing.

Authors:  S Keeney; F Hasson; H P McKenna
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.837

2.  Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity.

Authors:  Christine A Wynd; Bruce Schmidt; Michelle Atkins Schaefer
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  Validating the personal health records adoption model using a modified e-Delphi.

Authors:  Melanie D Logue; Judith A Effken
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2012-06-10       Impact factor: 3.187

4.  Expert validation of a teamwork assessment rubric: A modified Delphi study.

Authors:  Jenny A Parratt; Kathleen M Fahy; Marie Hutchinson; Gui Lohmann; Carolyn R Hastie; Marilyn Chaseling; Kylie O'Brien
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.442

5.  Content validity of a process evaluation checklist to measure intervention implementation fidelity of the EPIC intervention.

Authors:  Janet Yamada; Bonnie Stevens; Souraya Sidani; Judy Watt-Watson; Nicole de Silva
Journal:  Worldviews Evid Based Nurs       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  Improving the content validity of the mixed methods appraisal tool: a modified e-Delphi study.

Authors:  Quan Nha Hong; Pierre Pluye; Sergi Fàbregues; Gillian Bartlett; Felicity Boardman; Margaret Cargo; Pierre Dagenais; Marie-Pierre Gagnon; Frances Griffiths; Belinda Nicolau; Alicia O'Cathain; Marie-Claude Rousseau; Isabelle Vedel
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Developing an instrument to measure emotional behaviour abilities of meaningful learning through the Delphi technique.

Authors:  Lucia Cadorin; Annamaria Bagnasco; Angela Tolotti; Nicola Pagnucci; Loredana Sasso
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.187

8.  Design and Implementation Content Validity Study: Development of an instrument for measuring Patient-Centered Communication.

Authors:  Vahid Zamanzadeh; Akram Ghahramanian; Maryam Rassouli; Abbas Abbaszadeh; Hamid Alavi-Majd; Ali-Reza Nikanfar
Journal:  J Caring Sci       Date:  2015-06-01

9.  Identification of pain indicators for infants at risk for neurological impairment: a Delphi consensus study.

Authors:  Bonnie Stevens; Patrick McGrath; Janet Yamada; Sharyn Gibbins; Joseph Beyene; Lynn Breau; Carol Camfield; Allen Finley; Linda Franck; Alexandra Howlett; Celeste Johnston; Patricia McKeever; Karel O'Brien; Arne Ohlsson
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 2.125

10.  Consensus among healthcare stakeholders on a collaborative medication therapy management model for chronic diseases in Malaysia; A Delphi study.

Authors:  Naeem Mubarak; Ernieda Hatah; Mohd Aznan Md Aris; Asrul Akmal Shafie; Che Suraya Zin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  A new SLA-aware method for discovering the cloud services using an improved nature-inspired optimization algorithm.

Authors:  Arash Heidari; Nima Jafari Navimipour
Journal:  PeerJ Comput Sci       Date:  2021-05-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.