Literature DB >> 33816937

A methodology for psycho-biological assessment of stress in software engineering.

Jan-Peter Ostberg1, Daniel Graziotin1, Stefan Wagner1, Birgit Derntl2.   

Abstract

Stress pervades our everyday life to the point of being considered the scourge of the modern industrial world. The effects of stress on knowledge workers causes, in short term, performance fluctuations, decline of concentration, bad sensorimotor coordination, and an increased error rate, while long term exposure to stress leads to issues such as dissatisfaction, resignation, depression and general psychosomatic ailment and disease. Software developers are known to be stressed workers. Stress has been suggested to have detrimental effects on team morale and motivation, communication and cooperation-dependent work, software quality, maintainability, and requirements management. There is a need to effectively assess, monitor, and reduce stress for software developers. While there is substantial psycho-social and medical research on stress and its measurement, we notice that the transfer of these methods and practices to software engineering has not been fully made. For this reason, we engage in an interdisciplinary endeavor between researchers in software engineering and medical and social sciences towards a better understanding of stress effects while developing software. This article offers two main contributions. First, we provide an overview of supported theories of stress and the many ways to assess stress in individuals. Second, we propose a robust methodology to detect and measure stress in controlled experiments that is tailored to software engineering research. We also evaluate the methodology by implementing it on an experiment, which we first pilot and then replicate in its enhanced form, and report on the results with lessons learned. With this work, we hope to stimulate research on stress in software engineering and inspire future research that is backed up by supported theories and employs psychometrically validated measures.
© 2020 Ostberg et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biological markers; Effects of stress; Methodology; Psychological assessment; Software development; Stress

Year:  2020        PMID: 33816937      PMCID: PMC7924460          DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PeerJ Comput Sci        ISSN: 2376-5992


  34 in total

1.  Correspondence of emotional self-rating with facial expression.

Authors:  U Weiss; J B Salloum; F Schneider
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  1999-05-31       Impact factor: 3.222

Review 2.  Does positive affect influence health?

Authors:  Sarah D Pressman; Sheldon Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 3.  The case for positive emotions in the stress process.

Authors:  Susan Folkman
Journal:  Anxiety Stress Coping       Date:  2008-01

4.  The relationship between salivary biomarkers and state-trait anxiety inventory score under mental arithmetic stress: a pilot study.

Authors:  Yuka Noto; Tetsumi Sato; Mihoko Kudo; Kiyoshi Kurata; Kazuyoshi Hirota
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales.

Authors:  D Watson; L A Clark; A Tellegen
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1988-06

6.  Health factors involved in working under conditions of heat stress. Report of a WHO Scientific Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser       Date:  1969

Review 7.  Clinical assessment of sympathetic responses to stress.

Authors:  D S Goldstein
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1995-12-29       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  A global measure of perceived stress.

Authors:  S Cohen; T Kamarck; R Mermelstein
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1983-12

9.  Aftereffects of stress on human performance and social behavior: a review of research and theory.

Authors:  S Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Impact of self-esteem and sex on stress reactions.

Authors:  Lydia Kogler; Eva-Maria Seidel; Hannah Metzler; Hanna Thaler; Roland N Boubela; Jens C Pruessner; Ilse Kryspin-Exner; Ruben C Gur; Christian Windischberger; Ewald Moser; Ute Habel; Birgit Derntl
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.