Literature DB >> 33816932

Towards FAIR protocols and workflows: the OpenPREDICT use case.

Remzi Celebi1, Joao Rebelo Moreira2, Ahmed A Hassan3, Sandeep Ayyar4, Lars Ridder5, Tobias Kuhn2, Michel Dumontier1.   

Abstract

It is essential for the advancement of science that researchers share, reuse and reproduce each other's workflows and protocols. The FAIR principles are a set of guidelines that aim to maximize the value and usefulness of research data, and emphasize the importance of making digital objects findable and reusable by others. The question of how to apply these principles not just to data but also to the workflows and protocols that consume and produce them is still under debate and poses a number of challenges. In this paper we describe a two-fold approach of simultaneously applying the FAIR principles to scientific workflows as well as the involved data. We apply and evaluate our approach on the case of the PREDICT workflow, a highly cited drug repurposing workflow. This includes FAIRification of the involved datasets, as well as applying semantic technologies to represent and store data about the detailed versions of the general protocol, of the concrete workflow instructions, and of their execution traces. We propose a semantic model to address these specific requirements and was evaluated by answering competency questions. This semantic model consists of classes and relations from a number of existing ontologies, including Workflow4ever, PROV, EDAM, and BPMN. This allowed us then to formulate and answer new kinds of competency questions. Our evaluation shows the high degree to which our FAIRified OpenPREDICT workflow now adheres to the FAIR principles and the practicality and usefulness of being able to answer our new competency questions. ©2020 Celebi et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drug repurposing; FAIR data principles; FAIR workflows; Ontology-driven healthcare; Reproducibility; Research Object; Scientific workflows and protocols; Semantic web

Year:  2020        PMID: 33816932      PMCID: PMC7924452          DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PeerJ Comput Sci        ISSN: 2376-5992


  30 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosing the decline in pharmaceutical R&D efficiency.

Authors:  Jack W Scannell; Alex Blanckley; Helen Boldon; Brian Warrington
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research.

Authors:  C Glenn Begley; Lee M Ellis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-07-13       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Gene expression omnibus: microarray data storage, submission, retrieval, and analysis.

Authors:  Tanya Barrett; Ron Edgar
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.600

5.  1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility.

Authors:  Monya Baker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Using semantics for representing experimental protocols.

Authors:  Olga Giraldo; Alexander García; Federico López; Oscar Corcho
Journal:  J Biomed Semantics       Date:  2017-11-13

7.  Ontology-Based Querying with Bio2RDF's Linked Open Data.

Authors:  Alison Callahan; José Cruz-Toledo; Michel Dumontier
Journal:  J Biomed Semantics       Date:  2013-04-15

8.  On the reproducibility of science: unique identification of research resources in the biomedical literature.

Authors:  Nicole A Vasilevsky; Matthew H Brush; Holly Paddock; Laura Ponting; Shreejoy J Tripathy; Gregory M Larocca; Melissa A Haendel
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  A phenome-guided drug repositioning through a latent variable model.

Authors:  Halil Bisgin; Zhichao Liu; Hong Fang; Reagan Kelly; Xiaowei Xu; Weida Tong
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship.

Authors:  Mark D Wilkinson; Michel Dumontier; I Jsbrand Jan Aalbersberg; Gabrielle Appleton; Myles Axton; Arie Baak; Niklas Blomberg; Jan-Willem Boiten; Luiz Bonino da Silva Santos; Philip E Bourne; Jildau Bouwman; Anthony J Brookes; Tim Clark; Mercè Crosas; Ingrid Dillo; Olivier Dumon; Scott Edmunds; Chris T Evelo; Richard Finkers; Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran; Alasdair J G Gray; Paul Groth; Carole Goble; Jeffrey S Grethe; Jaap Heringa; Peter A C 't Hoen; Rob Hooft; Tobias Kuhn; Ruben Kok; Joost Kok; Scott J Lusher; Maryann E Martone; Albert Mons; Abel L Packer; Bengt Persson; Philippe Rocca-Serra; Marco Roos; Rene van Schaik; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Erik Schultes; Thierry Sengstag; Ted Slater; George Strawn; Morris A Swertz; Mark Thompson; Johan van der Lei; Erik van Mulligen; Jan Velterop; Andra Waagmeester; Peter Wittenburg; Katherine Wolstencroft; Jun Zhao; Barend Mons
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 6.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.