Literature DB >> 33816872

The importance of behavioral data to identify online fake reviews for tourism businesses: a systematic review.

Ana Reyes-Menendez1, Jose Ramon Saura1, Ferrão Filipe2.   

Abstract

In the last several decades, electronic word of mouth (eWOM) has been widely used by consumers on different digital platforms to gather feedback about products and services from previous customer behavior. However, this useful information is getting blurred by fake reviews-i.e., reviews that were created artificially and are thus not representative of real customer opinions. The present study aims to thoroughly investigate the phenomenon of fake online reviews in the tourism sector on social networking and online reviews sites. To this end, we conducted a systematic review of the literature on fake reviews for tourism businesses. Our focus was on previous studies that addressed the following two main topics: (i) tourism (ii) fake reviews. Scientific databases were used to collect relevant literature. The search terms "tourism" and "fake reviews" were applied. The database of Web of Science produced a total of 124 articles and, after the application of different filters following the PRISMA 2009 Flow diagram, the process resulted in the selection of 17 studies. Our results demonstrate that (i) the analysis of fake reviews is interdisciplinary, ranging from Computer Science to Business and Management, (ii) the methods are based on algorithms and sentiment analysis, while other methodologies are rarely used; and (iii) the current and future state of fraudulent detection is based on emotional approaches, semantic analysis and new technologies such as Blockchain. This study also provides helpful strategies to counteract the ubiquity of fake reviews for tourism businesses. ©2019 Reyes-Menendez et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Algorithms; Consumer behavior; Fake reviews; Online reviews; Tourism

Year:  2019        PMID: 33816872      PMCID: PMC7924504          DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PeerJ Comput Sci        ISSN: 2376-5992


  6 in total

1.  AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Beverley J Shea; Candyce Hamel; George A Wells; Lex M Bouter; Elizabeth Kristjansson; Jeremy Grimshaw; David A Henry; Maarten Boers
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Comparing yoga, exercise, and a self-care book for chronic low back pain: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Karen J Sherman; Daniel C Cherkin; Janet Erro; Diana L Miglioretti; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  A Literature Review of Word of Mouth and Electronic Word of Mouth: Implications for Consumer Behavior.

Authors:  Nuria Huete-Alcocer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-25

5.  Understanding #WorldEnvironmentDay User Opinions in Twitter: A Topic-Based Sentiment Analysis Approach.

Authors:  Ana Reyes-Menendez; José Ramón Saura; Cesar Alvarez-Alonso
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  What Is Citizen Science?--A Scientometric Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Christopher Kullenberg; Dick Kasperowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Spammer group detection and diversification of customers' reviews.

Authors:  Naveed Hussain; Hamid Turab Mirza; Abid Ali; Faiza Iqbal; Ibrar Hussain; Mohammad Kaleem
Journal:  PeerJ Comput Sci       Date:  2021-04-09

2.  Automatic emotion recognition in healthcare data using supervised machine learning.

Authors:  Nazish Azam; Tauqir Ahmad; Nazeef Ul Haq
Journal:  PeerJ Comput Sci       Date:  2021-12-15

3.  Engagement of Government Social Media on Facebook during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Macao.

Authors:  Patrick Cheong-Iao Pang; Qixin Cai; Wenjing Jiang; Kin Sun Chan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-28       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.