Literature DB >> 33816852

Predicting the results of evaluation procedures of academics.

Francesco Poggi1, Paolo Ciancarini1,2, Aldo Gangemi3, Andrea Giovanni Nuzzolese4, Silvio Peroni3, Valentina Presutti4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 2010 reform of the Italian university system introduced the National Scientific Habilitation (ASN) as a requirement for applying to permanent professor positions. Since the CVs of the 59,149 candidates and the results of their assessments have been made publicly available, the ASN constitutes an opportunity to perform analyses about a nation-wide evaluation process.
OBJECTIVE: The main goals of this paper are: (i) predicting the ASN results using the information contained in the candidates' CVs; (ii) identifying a small set of quantitative indicators that can be used to perform accurate predictions. APPROACH: Semantic technologies are used to extract, systematize and enrich the information contained in the applicants' CVs, and machine learning methods are used to predict the ASN results and to identify a subset of relevant predictors.
RESULTS: For predicting the success in the role of associate professor, our best models using all and the top 15 predictors make accurate predictions (F-measure values higher than 0.6) in 88% and 88.6% of the cases, respectively. Similar results have been achieved for the role of full professor. EVALUATION: The proposed approach outperforms the other models developed to predict the results of researchers' evaluation procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: Such results allow the development of an automated system for supporting both candidates and committees in the future ASN sessions and other scholars' evaluation procedures. ©2019 Poggi et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ASN; Academic assessment; Data Processing; Informetrics; Machine Learning; National Scientific Habilitation; Predictive Models; Research Evaluation; Science of Science; Scientometrics

Year:  2019        PMID: 33816852      PMCID: PMC7924640          DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PeerJ Comput Sci        ISSN: 2376-5992


  3 in total

1.  Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime data.

Authors:  Lutz Bornmann; Robin Haunschild
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Predicting academic career outcomes by predoctoral publication record.

Authors:  Jason R Tregellas; Jason Smucny; Donald C Rojas; Kristina T Legget
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Does the committee peer review select the best applicants for funding? An investigation of the selection process for two European molecular biology organization programmes.

Authors:  Lutz Bornmann; Gerlind Wallon; Anna Ledin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Using altmetrics for detecting impactful research in quasi-zero-day time-windows: the case of COVID-19.

Authors:  Erik Boetto; Maria Pia Fantini; Aldo Gangemi; Davide Golinelli; Manfredi Greco; Andrea Giovanni Nuzzolese; Valentina Presutti; Flavia Rallo
Journal:  Scientometrics       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.238

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.