Literature DB >> 33816815

Performance, workload, and usability in a multiscreen, multi-device, information-rich environment.

Jason J Saleem1,2, Dustin T Weiler1,3.   

Abstract

Potential benefits of multiscreen and multiple device environments were assessed using three different computing environments. A single factor, within-subject study was conducted with 18 engineering students in a laboratory experiment. Three levels for the computing environment factor included one with a desktop computer with a single monitor (control, condition A); one with a desktop with dual monitors, as well as a single tablet computer (condition B); and one with a desktop with a single monitor, as well as two tablet computers (condition C). There was no statistically significant difference in efficiency or workload when completing scenarios for the three computing environments. However, a dual monitor desktop with a single tablet computer (B) was the ideal computing environment for the information-rich engineering problem given to participants, supported by significantly fewer errors compared to condition C and significantly higher usability ratings compared to conditions A and C. A single desktop monitor with two tablet computers (C) did not provide any advantage compared to a single desktop monitor (A). ©2018 Saleem and Weiler.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dual monitors; Human-computer interaction; Multiscreen; Tablet computers

Year:  2018        PMID: 33816815      PMCID: PMC7924668          DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PeerJ Comput Sci        ISSN: 2376-5992


  4 in total

1.  Dual vs. single computer monitor in a Canadian hospital Archiving Department: a study of efficiency and satisfaction.

Authors:  Thomas G Poder; Sylvie T Godbout; Christian Bellemare
Journal:  Health Inf Manag       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.185

2.  User-preferred position of computer displays: effects of display size.

Authors:  Gwanseob Shin; Sudeep Hegde
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.888

3.  Platform for efficient switching between multiple devices in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  F De Backere; T Vanhove; E Dejonghe; M Feys; T Herinckx; J Vankelecom; J Decruyenaere; F De Turck
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 2.176

4.  Exploring the persistence of paper with the electronic health record.

Authors:  Jason J Saleem; Alissa L Russ; Connie F Justice; Heather Hagg; Patricia R Ebright; Peter A Woodbridge; Bradley N Doebbeling
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 4.046

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.