| Literature DB >> 33816740 |
Yang Hu1, Ahmed N Al-Niaimi2,3, Alain Cagaanan4, Elizabeth A Sadowski3,5, David M Kushner2,3, Paul S Weisman3,4, Stephanie M McGregor3,4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Progestin-based therapy is common for patients with endometrial neoplasia who desire fertility preservation, but some patients ultimately require surgery. Intraoperative assessment, which can use gross lesion size, may impact the extent of surgery performed. We sought to characterize the extent to which grossly identified lesions in the setting of progestin therapy correspond to microscopic findings.Entities:
Keywords: Atypical hyperplasia; Endometrial cancer; Lymphadenectomy; Progestin; Treatment effect
Year: 2021 PMID: 33816740 PMCID: PMC8008181 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2021.100747
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gynecol Oncol Rep ISSN: 2352-5789
Detailed clinical information for patient cohort.
| Age | BMI | Initial Dx | Pre-Tx MRI | Post-Tx MRI | Tx Days | Progestin Type(s) | Indication for surgery/Pre-surgical biopsy | Gross Tumor (cm) | Worst Disease at Hyst | DS | MMR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-menopausal | 1 | 28 | 37 | FIGO 1 | 2.8 cm tumor | 1.4 cm thick with 8 mm focus | 757 | Megace, IUD | Personal decision to forgo fertility preservation/Benign | 4.5 | FIGO 1 | 90% | Intact |
| 2 | 32 | 29 | CH | 4.2 cm tumor | 5.1 cm tumor | 268 | Megace, IUD | FIGO 1 | 6.2 | FIGO 1 | 90% | Intact | |
| 3 | 34 | 66 | CAH | NA | NA | 273 | Megace, Provera, Norplant | CAH | 2.2 | CAH | 70% | Not tested | |
| 4 | 34 | 67 | CH | NA | 15 mm thick | 62 | Megace, IUD | CAH | NA | FIGO 1 | 25% | Not tested | |
| 5 | 36 | 42 | FIGO 1 | NA | 2.8 cm tumor | 68 | Provera | FIGO 1 | 7 | Focal H | 90% | Intact | |
| 6 | 37 | 31 | FIGO 1 | NA | NA | 24 | Megace | FIGO 1 | 4.2 | FIGO 1 | 70% | Not tested | |
| 7 | 41 | 33 | FIGO 1 | NA | NA | 332 | Megace, Provera, IUD | FIGO 1 | 3.5 | FIGO 1 | 60% | Intact | |
| 8 | 42 | 35 | CAH | NA | NA | 17 | Provera | CAH | NA | FIGO 1 | 10% | Not tested | |
| Post-menopausal | 9 | 51 | 39 | FIGO 1 | NA | NA | 68 | Megace | FIGO 1 | 7 | FIGO 1 | 30% | Intact |
| 10 | 58 | 49 | CAH | 6.8 cm tumor | NA | 272 | Megace | FIGO 1 | 8.2 | FIGO 1 | 10% | Intact | |
| 11 | 58 | 62 | FIGO 1 | NA | NA | 72 | Provera | FIGO 1 | 1 | FIGO 1 | 10% | Intact | |
| 12 | 58 | 54 | CAH | NA | NA | 88 | Megace | CAH | 6 | FIGO 1 | 40% | Intact | |
| 13 | 59 | 44 | CAH | NA | NA | 59 | Provera, IUD | CAH | 2.5 | FIGO 1 | 25% | Intact |
Fig. 1Mass size of neoplastic lesion plotted against stromal decidualization for premenopausal women under age 50.
Fig. 2Stromal decidualization plotted against age for all women.
Fig. 3(A) Pelvic MRI of mass in (C) before progestin treatment. Largest dimension is 41.9 mm. (B) Pelvic MRI of mass in (C) after treatment. Largest dimension is 50.7 mm. (C) Gross photograph of bivalved uterus showing a 6.2 cm mass lesion.
Fig. 4(A) Scanning magnification (x20) of premenopausal patient with 6.2 cm mass. Decidualized stroma comprises the vast majority of the grossly evident mass. (B) Higher magnification (x200) of decidualized stroma and diminutive gland. (C) Higher magnification of focal endometrial carcinoma demonstrates crowded glands without intervening decidualized stroma. The focus of carcinoma comprises approximately 5% of the endometrial volume in this figure.