| Literature DB >> 33816234 |
Zixin Guo1,2, Xin Yan2,3, Congkuan Song1,4, Qingwen Wang1,4, Yujin Wang1,4, Xiao-Ping Liu3, Jingyu Huang1,4, Sheng Li2,5, Weidong Hu1,4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the mutated genes in esophageal cancer (ESCA), and evaluate its relationship with tumor mutation burden (TMB) and prognosis of ESCA, and analyze the advantages of FAT3 as a potential prognostic marker in ESCA.Entities:
Keywords: FAT3; bioinformatics; esophageal cancer; prognostic marker; tumor mutation burden
Year: 2021 PMID: 33816234 PMCID: PMC8018597 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.603660
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Figure 1Landscapes of frequently mutated genes in esophageal cancer. (A) Oncoplot displaying the landscapes of frequently mutated genes in ESCA from the TCGA database. Genes are ordered according to their mutation frequency (left panel), and different mutation types were presented as indicated by the annotation bar (bottom). (B) Waterfall plot displaying the landscapes of frequently mutated genes in ESCA from the ICGC database. Genes are ordered according to their mutation frequency (left panel), and different mutation types were presented as indicated by the annotation bar (right panel). (C) Venn diagram displaying the common frequently mutated genes that were both of the top 30 high-frequency mutated genes in the TCAG database and ICGC database.
Figure 2Gene mutations are associated with TMB. Compared with the wild type of genes, the mutation type of CSMD1, SPTA1, TTH, FAT3, SYNE1, LRP1B, RYR2, PCLO, MUC16, CSMD3, and USH2A had significantly higher TMB in patients with ESCA. **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p<0.0001. WT, wild type; MT, mutant type.
Figure 3Gene mutations are associated with clinical prognosis. (A) The high-TMB group was related to a negative prognosis in ESCA. (B–D) The association of gene mutations with survival prognosis was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method. A total of 144 samples containing complete clinical information were included. P-values<0.05 were considered significant. WT, wild type; MT, mutant type.
Univariate and multivariate Cox analysis of esophageal cancer patients by the IBM SPSS Statistics (version 20).
| Factors | Univariate | Multivariate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95%CI) | P-value | HR (95%CI) | P-value | |
| Age (year)(<60,≥60) | 1.326(0.712–2.471) | 0.374 | ||
| Gender (male, female) | 0.831(0.325–2.125) | 0.7 | ||
| Stage (stage I and II, stage III and IV) | 3.743(1.929–7.261) | <0.001 | 3.992(2.043–7.800) | <0.001 |
| TMB (low, high) | 1.971(1.031–3.767) | 0.04 | – | 0.257 |
| LRP1B (wide, mutant) | 2.073(1.063–4.044) | 0.032 | – | 0.409 |
| FAT3 (wide, mutant) | 2.353(1.102–5.026) | 0.027 | 2.734(1.262–5.922) | 0.011 |
| CSMD1 (wide, mutant) | 2.169(1.019–4.614) | 0.044 | – | 0.551 |
Figure 4Significantly enriched pathways associated with FAT3 mutation. GSEA was performed with TCGA to explore the function role of FTA3 mutation. The GSEA analysis showed that samples with FAT3 mutation enriched in (A) ERBB2 Breast Preneoplastic UP, (B) Kras Oncogenic Signature, (C) “Malignant Skin Tumor DN, (D) MCV6 LCP With H3K27ME3 pathway, and (E) MET Signaling pathway. NES, normalized enrichment score.
Figure 5Association of FAT3 Mutation with Tumor-infiltrating Immune. (A) Stacked bar chart shows the proportion of 22 immune cells in each samples of ESCA. (B) Violin plot displays the differentially infiltrated immune cells between FAT3-mutant groups and FAT3-wild group. Blue color: FAT3-wild group; Red color: FAT3-mutant group. (C) Correlation matrix of immune cell proportions. Red color: positive correlation; Blue color: negative correlation.