Hee Jin Park1, Sung Hae Chang2, Jeong Won Lee3, Sang Mi Lee4. 1. Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, International St. Mary's Hospital, 25, Simgok-ro 100-gil, Seo-gu, Incheon, Korea. 2. Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, 31 Suncheonhyang 6-gil, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea. 3. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, International St. Mary's Hospital, 25, Simgok-ro 100-gil, Seo-gu, Incheon, Korea. 4. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, 31 Suncheonhyang 6-gil, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to investigate the clinical implication of F-18 sodium fluoride (NaF) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for assessing the disease activity of rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Seventeen patients with rheumatoid arthritis according to the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria were prospectively enrolled. All enrolled patients underwent F-18 NaF PET/CT along with physical examination, blood test, and ultrasonography. On PET/CT images, two quantitative parameters, F-18 NaF uptake of the joint (joint SUV) and joint-to-bone uptake ratio, were measured for each of the 28 joints included in calculating the disease activity score in 28 joints using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR). The relationship between PET/CT parameters and clinical factors and the predictive values of PET/CT parameters for joints with synovitis and high disease activity were evaluated. RESULTS: Tender joints (joint SUV, 13.6±8.4; joint-to-bone uptake ratio, 1.70±1.02) and both tender and swollen joints (joint SUV, 13.9±5.4; joint-to-normal bone uptake ratio, 1.81±0.76) had significantly higher joint SUV and joint-to-bone uptake ratio than joints without synovitis (joint SUV, 6.0±2.4; joint-to-bone uptake ratio, 0.74±0.31; P<0.001). On correlation analysis, summed joint SUV (P=0.002, correlation coefficient=0.705) and summed joint-to-bone uptake ratio (P<0.001, correlation coefficient=0.861) of 28 joints showed strong positive correlation with DAS28-ESR after adjustment for age and body mass index. Summed joint SUV showed significant positive correlations with ultrasonography findings (grey scale ultrasonography: P=0.047, correlation coefficient =0.468; power Doppler ultrasonography: P=0.045, correlation coefficient =0.507). On the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the sensitivity and specificity for predicting synovitis were 83.2% and 92.7%, respectively, for joint SUV and 81.5% and 90.7%, respectively, for joint-to-bone uptake ratio. Moreover, the summation of both PET/CT parameters of 28 joints showed a diagnostic accuracy of 100.0% for predicting high disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis. CONCLUSIONS: Summed joint uptake on F-18 NaF PET/CT had a strong positive correlation with DAS28-ESR and accurately predicted high disease activity. F-18 NaF PET/CT parameters might be used as an imaging biomarker for disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at the Clinical Research Information Service of the Korea (CRIS, http://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/en; registry number, KCT0002597; registered November 2017). 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to investigate the clinical implication of F-18 sodium fluoride (NaF) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for assessing the disease activity of rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Seventeen patients with rheumatoid arthritis according to the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria were prospectively enrolled. All enrolled patients underwent F-18 NaF PET/CT along with physical examination, blood test, and ultrasonography. On PET/CT images, two quantitative parameters, F-18 NaF uptake of the joint (joint SUV) and joint-to-bone uptake ratio, were measured for each of the 28 joints included in calculating the disease activity score in 28 joints using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR). The relationship between PET/CT parameters and clinical factors and the predictive values of PET/CT parameters for joints with synovitis and high disease activity were evaluated. RESULTS: Tender joints (joint SUV, 13.6±8.4; joint-to-bone uptake ratio, 1.70±1.02) and both tender and swollen joints (joint SUV, 13.9±5.4; joint-to-normal bone uptake ratio, 1.81±0.76) had significantly higher joint SUV and joint-to-bone uptake ratio than joints without synovitis (joint SUV, 6.0±2.4; joint-to-bone uptake ratio, 0.74±0.31; P<0.001). On correlation analysis, summed joint SUV (P=0.002, correlation coefficient=0.705) and summed joint-to-bone uptake ratio (P<0.001, correlation coefficient=0.861) of 28 joints showed strong positive correlation with DAS28-ESR after adjustment for age and body mass index. Summed joint SUV showed significant positive correlations with ultrasonography findings (grey scale ultrasonography: P=0.047, correlation coefficient =0.468; power Doppler ultrasonography: P=0.045, correlation coefficient =0.507). On the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the sensitivity and specificity for predicting synovitis were 83.2% and 92.7%, respectively, for joint SUV and 81.5% and 90.7%, respectively, for joint-to-bone uptake ratio. Moreover, the summation of both PET/CT parameters of 28 joints showed a diagnostic accuracy of 100.0% for predicting high disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis. CONCLUSIONS: Summed joint uptake on F-18 NaF PET/CT had a strong positive correlation with DAS28-ESR and accurately predicted high disease activity. F-18 NaF PET/CT parameters might be used as an imaging biomarker for disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at the Clinical Research Information Service of the Korea (CRIS, http://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/en; registry number, KCT0002597; registered November 2017). 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
Authors: George Segall; Dominique Delbeke; Michael G Stabin; Einat Even-Sapir; Joanna Fair; Rebecca Sajdak; Gary T Smith Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Klaus Strobel; Dorothee R Fischer; Giorgio Tamborrini; Diego Kyburz; Katrin D M Stumpe; Rolf G X Hesselmann; A Johayem; Gustav K von Schulthess; Beat A Michel; Adrian Ciurea Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2010-05-27 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Babak Saboury; Molly A Parsons; Mateen Moghbel; Domenico Rubello; Alex Brothers; Drew A Torigian; Thomas J Werner; Sina Houshmand; Sandip Basu; Marnix G E H Lam; Abass Alavi Journal: Nucl Med Commun Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 1.690
Authors: Ai Lyn Tan; Steven F Tanner; Michael L Waller; Elizabeth M A Hensor; Alison Burns; Alan P Jeavons; Robert F Bury; Paul Emery; Dennis McGonagle Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2013-01-09 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: Ji Young Kim; Soo-Kyung Cho; Minkyung Han; Yun Young Choi; Sang-Cheol Bae; Yoon-Kyoung Sung Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2014-01-28 Impact factor: 2.153