| Literature DB >> 33816004 |
Rocco Dabecco1, Michael J Gigliotti2, Gordon Mao1, Sarah Browning3, Steven Hertz4, Sungyub Lew5.
Abstract
Background Cerebral vasospasm has been monitored by conventional angiography or transcranial Doppler (TCD). While angiography is the most accurate and reliable method for detection, TCDs are a noninvasive alternative to monitor onset and resolution of vasospasm. We aim to determine whether alternative TCD parameters rather than Lindegaard ratio lead to an improved method to diagnose and potentially prevent cerebral vasospasm. Methods A total of 103 consecutive patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) were retrospectively reviewed and TCD studies were performed during the first 14 days post-bleed or longer if indicated. Multivariate logistic regression models were developed using significant univariate characteristics. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves evaluated the mean middle cerebral artery (MCA), peak systolic MCA (PSV MCA), and end diastolic MCA (EDV MCA) velocities as well as ratios when compared to the ipsilateral extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA). The area under the curve was calculated to compare accuracy for symptomatic vasospasm. Results Thirteen patients (12.6%) were observed to develop cerebral vasospasm. Aneurysm location (p = 0.51), Hunt and Hess grade (p = 0.44), Fischer grade (p = 0.87), comorbidities, age (p = 0.67), or gender (p = 0.41) did not appear to have any effect in predicting the presence of vasospasm. ROC curves demonstrated that MCA EDV appeared to be slightly better compared to MCA velocity in predicting symptomatic vasospasm. PSV MCA/extracranial ICA and the EDV MCA/extracranial ICA ratios appeared to be an improvement to the Lindegaard ratio in the prediction of symptomatic vasospasm. Conclusion The utility of peak systolic and end diastolic velocities, instead of the classically referenced mean velocities and Lindegaard ratio, may improve diagnostic sensitivity of cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage.Entities:
Keywords: aneurysm; subarachnoid hemorrhage; transcranial doppler; vasospasm
Year: 2021 PMID: 33816004 PMCID: PMC8011464 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.13605
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Patient demographics presenting with subarachnoid hemorrhage (with or without cerebral vasospasm).
EDV: End diastolic velocity; ACOMM: Anterior communicating artery; ICA: Internal carotid artery; MCA: Middle cerebral artery.
| Overall | No vasospasm | Vasospasm | p-value | |
| Age | 57 (14.1%) | 57 (14.4%) | 56 (12.3%) | 0.669 |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 27 (0.2%) | 25 (0.3%) | 2 (0.2%) | 0.405 |
| Female | 76 (0.7%) | 65 (0.7%) | 11 (0.8%) | |
| Comorbidity | ||||
| Hypertension | 61 (0.6%) | 54 (0.6%) | 7 (0.5%) | 0.981 |
| Diabetes | 20 (0.2%) | 17 (0.2%) | 3 (0.2%) | 0.863 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 32 (0.3%) | 28 (0.3%) | 4 (0.3%) | 0.969 |
| Drug Use | 5 (0%) | 4 (0%) | 1 (0.1%) | 0.827 |
| Smoker | 42 (0.4%) | 37 (0.4%) | 5 (0.4%) | 0.982 |
| Family History | 2 (0%) | 2 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0.861 |
| EDV | 61 (0.6%) | 50 (0.5%) | 11 (0.8%) | 0.082 |
| Mortality | 20 (0.2%) | 18 (0.2%) | 2 (0.2%) | 0.651 |
| Hunt & Hess grade | 0.442 | |||
| 1 | 22 (0.2%) | 21 (0.2%) | 1 (0.1%) | |
| 2 | 28 (0.3%) | 24 (0.3%) | 4 (0.3%) | |
| 3 | 26 (0.3%) | 21 (0.2%) | 5 (0.4%) | |
| 4 | 10 (0.1%) | 8 (0.1%) | 2 (0.2%) | |
| 5 | 18 (0.2%) | 17 (0.2%) | 1 (0.1%) | |
| Fischer grade | 0.873 | |||
| 1 | 4 (0%) | 4 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
| 2 | 17 (0.2%) | 15 (0.2%) | 2 (0.2%) | |
| 3 | 25 (0.2%) | 22 (0.2%) | 3 (0.2%) | |
| 4 | 57 (0.6%) | 49 (0.5%) | 8 (0.6%) | |
| Location | 0.514 | |||
| ACOMM | 22 (0.2%) | 3 (0.2%) | 25 (0.2%) | |
| ICA | 8 (0.1%) | 2 (0.2%) | 10 (0.1%) | |
| MCA | 12 (0.1%) | 3 (0.2%) | 15 (0.1%) | |
| Posterior circulation | 18 (0.2%) | 3 (0.2%) | 21 (0.2%) | |
| Other | 36 (0.4%) | 2 (0.2%) | 38 (0.3%) | |
Figure 1Distribution of patients developing symptomatic vasospasm according to day number post-subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Figure 2Distribution of patients developing vasospasm according to Hunt and Hess Grade.
Figure 3Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve demonstrating slight MCA EDV improvement (0.686, 95% CI: 0.562 – 0.811) to MCA mean velocity (0.684; 95% CI: 0.562 – 0.806) to predict symptomatic velocity.
MCA: Middle cerebral artery; EDV: End diastolic velocity.
Figure 4Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve demonstrating PSV MCA/extracranial ICA (0.654; 95% CI: 0.526 – 0.783) and the EDV MCA/extracranial ICA (0.644; 95% CI: 0.514 – 0.773) ratios appear to be better at predicting symptomatic vasospasm compared to the classically utilized Mean MCA/extracranial ICA ratio (0.621; 95% CI: 0.490 – 0.752).
MCA: Middle cerebral artery; ICA: Internal carotid artery; PSV: Peak systolic velocity.