Literature DB >> 33815806

The Role of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles, Escherichia coli, and Lactobacillus rhamnosus on Small Intestinal Enzyme Activity.

Alba García-Rodríguez1,2,3,4, Fabiola Moreno-Olivas1,2, Ricard Marcos4, Elad Tako5, Cláudia N H Marques2,3, Gretchen J Mahler1,2.   

Abstract

Engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) have become common in the food industry, which motivates the need to evaluate ENM effects on human health. Gastrointestinal (GI) in vitro models (e.g. Caco-2, Caco-2/HT29-MTX) have been used in nanotoxicology research. However, the human gut environment is composed of both human cells and the gut microbiota. The goal of this study is to increase the complexity of the Caco-2/HT29-MTX in vitro model by co-culturing human cells with the Gram-positive, commensal Lactobacillus rhamnosus or the Gram-negative, opportunistic Escherichia coli; with the hypothesis that the presence of bacteria would ameliorate the effects of exposure to metal oxide nanoparticles (NPs) such as iron oxide (Fe2O3), silicone dioxide (SiO2), titanium dioxide (TiO2), or zinc oxide (ZnO). To understand this relationship, Caco-2/HT29-MTX cell barriers were acutely co-exposed (4 hours) to bacteria and/or NPs (pristine or in vitro digested). The activity of the brush border membrane (BBM) enzymes intestinal alkaline phosphatase (IAP), aminopeptidase-N (APN), sucrase isomaltase (SI) and the basolateral membrane enzyme (BLM) Na+/K+ ATPase were assessed. Findings show that (i) the human digestion process alters the physicochemical properties of NPs, (ii) large agglomerates of NPs remain entrapped on the apical side of the intestinal barrier, which (iii) affects the activity of BBM enzymes. Interestingly, some NPs effects were attenuated in the presence of either bacterial strains. Confocal microscopy detected bacteria-NPs interactions, which may impede the NP-intestinal cell contact. These results highlight the importance of improving in vitro models to closely mimic the complexities of the human body.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33815806      PMCID: PMC8011031          DOI: 10.1039/d0en01001d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Nano


  125 in total

Review 1.  Applications and implications of nanotechnologies for the food sector.

Authors:  Qasim Chaudhry; Michael Scotter; James Blackburn; Bryony Ross; Alistair Boxall; Laurence Castle; Robert Aitken; Richard Watkins
Journal:  Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess       Date:  2008-03

2.  Commensal and Pathogenic Escherichia coli Metabolism in the Gut.

Authors:  Tyrrell Conway; Paul S Cohen
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2015-06

3.  Structure-function analysis of human sucrase-isomaltase identifies key residues required for catalytic activity.

Authors:  Birthe Gericke; Natalie Schecker; Mahdi Amiri; Hassan Y Naim
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Selenium redox biochemistry of zinc-sulfur coordination sites in proteins and enzymes.

Authors:  C Jacob; W Maret; B L Vallee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  ATR-FTIR spectroscopy reveals bond formation during bacterial adhesion to iron oxide.

Authors:  Sanjai J Parikh; Jon Chorover
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 3.882

Review 6.  A Review on Nano-Antimicrobials: Metal Nanoparticles, Methods and Mechanisms.

Authors:  Edris Hoseinzadeh; Pouran Makhdoumi; Parisa Taha; Hooshyar Hossini; John Stelling; Mohammad Amjad Kamal; Ghulam Md Ashraf
Journal:  Curr Drug Metab       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 3.731

7.  Alterations in the Gut ( Gallus gallus) Microbiota Following the Consumption of Zinc Biofortified Wheat ( Triticum aestivum)-Based Diet.

Authors:  Spenser Reed; Marija Knez; Atara Uzan; James C R Stangoulis; Raymond P Glahn; Omry Koren; Elad Tako
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 5.279

Review 8.  Is nano safe in foods? Establishing the factors impacting the gastrointestinal fate and toxicity of organic and inorganic food-grade nanoparticles.

Authors:  David Julian McClements; Hang Xiao
Journal:  NPJ Sci Food       Date:  2017-11-20

9.  An integrated methodology for assessing the impact of food matrix and gastrointestinal effects on the biokinetics and cellular toxicity of ingested engineered nanomaterials.

Authors:  Glen M DeLoid; Yanli Wang; Klara Kapronezai; Laura Rubio Lorente; Roujie Zhang; Georgios Pyrgiotakis; Nagarjun V Konduru; Maria Ericsson; Jason C White; Roberto De La Torre-Roche; Hang Xiao; David Julian McClements; Philip Demokritou
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 9.400

Review 10.  Review on nanoparticles and nanostructured materials: history, sources, toxicity and regulations.

Authors:  Jaison Jeevanandam; Ahmed Barhoum; Yen S Chan; Alain Dufresne; Michael K Danquah
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.649

View more
  2 in total

1.  Intestinal Microecology of Mice Exposed to TiO2 Nanoparticles and Bisphenol A.

Authors:  Chen Yang; Youlan Tan; Fengzhu Li; Hongbin Wang; Ying Lin; Fuping Lu; Huabing Zhao
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-06-09

2.  Impact of in vitro digested zinc oxide nanoparticles on intestinal model systems.

Authors:  Anna Mittag; Alina Singer; Christian Hoera; Martin Westermann; Alexander Kämpfe; Michael Glei
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 9.112

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.