Literature DB >> 33815603

Gadolinium-based contrast agents in neurofibromatosis type 1 (Review).

Florentina Năstase1, Diana Sabina Radaschin2,3, Elena Niculeț4,5, Bogdan Ioan Stefanescu3, Aurel Nechita6, Draganescu Miruna2,7, Liliana Baroiu2,7, Arbune Manuela2,7, Alin Laurenţiu Tatu2,3,8.   

Abstract

Gadolinium (symbol Gd) is the chemical element with atomic number 64 and is aductile rare-earth metal, and +3 is its most frequent oxidation state. Gadolinium has an ionic radius of 0.99 Å and is nearly identical to the one of Ca2+. Gd3+ and Ca2+ can become toxic to biological systems if complete. It slowly reacts with atmospheric oxygen to form a black coating and in nature it is usually found only in an oxidized form. Gadolinium usually has impurities similar to those of other rare-earth metals, when separated, because of their similar chemical properties. Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) or von Recklinghausen's disease is an autosomal dominant disorder of tissues of ectodermal origin, accounting for over 90% of neurofibromatosis cases. Diagnosis is primarily clinical and the central nervous system is commonly involved. The screening of the brain with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is utilised to evaluate the patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 and as an aid in the diagnosis of asymptomatic patients when clinical criteria are not met. Copyright: © Năstase et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; adverse reactions; contrast agent; gadolinium; neurofibromatosis type 1

Year:  2021        PMID: 33815603      PMCID: PMC8014979          DOI: 10.3892/etm.2021.9962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Ther Med        ISSN: 1792-0981            Impact factor:   2.447


1. Introduction

Gadolinium (Gd) has the atomic number 64. It is a heavy metal and belongs to the family of lanthanides. The oxidation state of gadolinium that is met often is +3. Gadolinium has an ionic radius of 0.99 Å and is almost identical to the one of Ca2+ (1). Gd3+ and Ca2+ can become toxic to biological systems if it compete. When administered to humans in chelated forms the presence of free gadolinium is avoided, thereby reducing its toxicity (2,3). Gd is capable of inducing a strong magnetic field that influences the degree of relaxivity of the protons of water molecules, resulting in a signal increase in MRI (4-6).

2. Development of gadolinium complexes

Runge first introduced the term of gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) in 1982 at the Radiologic Society of North America meeting in Chicago (7,8). GBCAs were thereafter produced commercially because this increases detection of the lesion. Fig. 1 shows the combined form of Gd-DTPA-Magnevist (also known as gadopentetate dimeglumine). In 1988, this complex was first authorized for use. Subsequently, gadolinium was used in the following complexes: Gd-DOTA-Dotarem (also known as gadoterate meglumine) (Fig. 2), Gd-HP-DO3A-ProHance (gadoteridol) (Fig. 3), and Gd-DTPABMA-Ominiscan (gadodiamide) (Fig. 4) (9). Following identification of the complexes, GBCAs were used for more than 30 years in more than 100,000,000 patients (1).
Figure 1

Chemical structure of gadopentetate dimeglumine.

Figure 2

Chemical structure of gadoterate meglumine.

Figure 3

Chemical structure of gadoteridol.

Figure 4

Chemical structure of gadodiamide.

3. Findings

The administration of gadolinium complexes rarely induces side effects and they can be divided into two groups: i) non-allergic reactions (fatigue, headache, arthralgia, gustatory perversion, flushed feeling, nausea, vomiting) and ii) idiosyncrasic allergy-like reactions (periorbital edema, rash, erythema, respiratory failure, chest pressure) (10,11). The frequency of side effects is similar to medical systemic or topical drugs used for various clinical conditions (12-21). Classified by the severity, the acute reactions to GBCA are: Mild, moderate and severe (10). The mild ones are auto-limited events, show no progress, are the most common and do not require medical treatment, except for skin reactions for which an antihistamine drug can be administered. Skin reactions occur in 0.07 and 2.4% of cases. Moderate reactions require medical treatment such as antihistamines, or transport to emergency room and occur in 0.004-0.7% of cases. The patient life is subjected to immediate risk by severe reaction; however, such reactions do not exceed 0.001-0.01% (10,11). If patients have a history of allergy, hypersensitivity to a gadolinium-based contrast agent or if they receive the contrast agent at a rapid rate, complications may occur (6). Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) or von Recklinghausen's disease is an autosomal dominant disorder involving tissues of ectodermal origin and represents over 90% of neurofibromatosis cases. Initially, the diagnosis is clinical (22). Symptoms manifest differently in each patient with a highly variable expression, even those within the same family (23,24). The diagnostic criteria take into account the cutaneous, neurological, ocular and skeletal manifestations to which is added the genetic component. These criteria were established in 1988 during the Neurofibromatosis - NIH Consensus Development Conference (22). If two or more criteria out of the seven are present, a clinical diagnosis can be made. The criteria are: i) prepubertal: Six or more than six 'café-au-lait' spots >5 mm and >15 mm, postpubertal; ii) two or more neurofibromas or one or more plexiform neurofibroma; iii) axillary or inguinal freckle (Crowe sign); iv) glioma of the optic nerve; v) two or more than two iris hamartomas; vi) sphenoid wing dysplasia, cortex of long bones thin(with/without pseudarthrosis); vii) a 1st degree relative with neurofibromatosis type 1 diagnosed using the above criteria (25). The central nervous system is commonly involved in NF1. The screening of the brain with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is utilised to evaluate the disease progression and as an aid in the diagnosis of asymptomatic patients when clinical criteria are not met (26-29). The most common intracranial abnormalities in NF1 patients are astrocytomas of the optic pathways, as indicated in the MRI of an 8-year-old female patient (Fig. 5). Surfaces with abnormal T-2 signal intensity are observed with high frequency and represent hamartomas or heterotopias as identified in an 8-year-old patient (Fig. 6).
Figure 5

Anterior view of a MRI image in T-2 transversal section and the right optic nerve thick and sinuous of a patient, aged 8 years presenting to the Clinical Hospital for Children, Galati, Romania. A, anterior view.

Figure 6

Anterior view of MRI showing FLAIR transversal section-midbrain hamartomas identified in an 8-year-old patient, obtained at the Clinical Hospital for Children, Galati, Romania. A, anterior view.

4. Discussion

Progression of these lesions in the second decade of life dictates the need for strict monitoring to exclude neoplasia. In adults the safety of contrast material has been well established, and according to preliminary data that it is also safe for use in children. Contrast administration is recommended when pre-contrast studies show abnormalities, when tumor is suspected, when improved lesion delineation is necessary, and when postoperative evaluation is required to ascertain tumor recurrence (30). Approximately 15% of all patients with NF1 have brain anomaly on MRI (27). The lesions are often multiple (29,30), in characteristic locations: The pons, cerebellar white matter, midbrain, splenium of the corpus callosum and internal capsule. Cerebellar tumors can compress the brain and the fourth ventricle (appearing hydrocephalus) and treatment may require surgical resection. On suspicion of a tumor, administrating contrast material can be helpful to fully delineate and help characterize it, with other investigations being performed for genetic or congenital disorders (30-34). Rehabilitation of patients can be applied at any stage of disease; consequently, the objectives change as the disease advances. The use of preventive rehabilitation ensures the maintenance of maximum functional independence. A decline in functional skills due to tumor progression leads to rehabilitation playing a supportive role via accommodating patients with anatomic and physiologic limitations. Palliative rehabilitation is recommended for the terminal stages of illness and isused to improve and maintain comfort and quality of life.

5. Conclusions

Contrast administration may be used to maximize tumor detection in basic MR and to determine the stability of neoplasms in follow-up exams. However, if there no new symptoms develop the contrast may not be necessary in patients with, for example, myelin vacuolization. Nevertheless, GBCA is safe and the patients tolerate it well.
  24 in total

Review 1.  The developmental history of the gadolinium chelates as intravenous contrast media for magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Val M Runge; Tao Ai; Dapeng Hao; Xuemei Hu
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 2.  MR contrast agents, the old and the new.

Authors:  Marie-France Bellin
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Neurofibromatosis: chronological history and current issues.

Authors:  João Roberto Antônio; Eny Maria Goloni-Bertollo; Lívia Arroyo Trídico
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.896

4.  Steatocystoma multiplex generalisata partially suppurativa--case report.

Authors:  Gyula László Fekete; Júlia Edit Fekete
Journal:  Acta Dermatovenerol Croat       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.256

Review 5.  MRI contrast agents: basic chemistry and safety.

Authors:  Dapeng Hao; Tao Ai; Frank Goerner; Xuemei Hu; Val M Runge; Michael Tweedle
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Response to - chronic exposure to tetracyclines and subsequent diagnosis for non-melanoma skin cancer in a large Mid-Western US population.

Authors:  L C Nwabudike; A L Tatu
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 7.  Primer on gadolinium chemistry.

Authors:  A Dean Sherry; Peter Caravan; Robert E Lenkinski
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Work in progress: potential oral and intravenous paramagnetic NMR contrast agents.

Authors:  V M Runge; R G Stewart; J A Clanton; M M Jones; C M Lukehart; C L Partain; A E James
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Brain gadolinium deposition after administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents.

Authors:  Tomonori Kanda; Hiroshi Oba; Keiko Toyoda; Kazuhiro Kitajima; Shigeru Furui
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.374

10.  Optic gliomas in children with neurofibromatosis type 1.

Authors:  A M Lund; F Skovby
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.