| Literature DB >> 33815530 |
H U Pan1,2, Jie Zhou1, Zhuoma Dawa2, Yanna Dai2, Yifan Zhang2, Hui Yang1, Chong Wang1, Huhu Liu1, Hui Zhou1, Xiangyang Lu1, Yun Tian1.
Abstract
The soil bacterial communities have been widely investigated. However, there has been little study of the bacteria in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, especially about the culturable bacteria in highland barley cultivation soil. Here, a total of 830 individual strains were obtained at 4°C and 25°C from a highland barley cultivation soil in Qamdo, Tibet Autonomous Region, using fifteen kinds of media. Seventy-seven species were obtained, which belonged to 42 genera and four phyla; the predominant phylum was Actinobacteria (68.82%), followed by Proteobacteria (15.59%), Firmicutes (14.29%), and Bacteroidetes (1.30%). The predominant genus was Streptomyces (22.08%, 17 species), followed by Bacillus (6.49%, five species), Micromonospora (5.19%, four species), Microbacterium (5.19%, four species), and Kribbella (3.90%, three species). The most diverse isolates belonged to a high G+C Gram-positive group; in particular, the Streptomyces genus is a dominant genus in the high G+C Gram-positive group. There were 62 species and 33 genera bacteria isolated at 25°C (80.52%), 23 species, and 18 genera bacteria isolated at 4°C (29.87%). Meanwhile, only eight species and six genera bacteria could be isolated at 25°C and 4°C. Of the 77 species, six isolates related to six genera might be novel taxa. The results showed abundant bacterial species diversity in the soil sample from the Qamdo, Tibet Autonomous Region.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA, novel taxa; Qinghai-Tibet Plateau; Streptomyces; high-altitude area
Year: 2021 PMID: 33815530 PMCID: PMC8008761 DOI: 10.33073/pjm-2021-008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pol J Microbiol ISSN: 1733-1331
Isolation media.
| Media | Composition |
|---|---|
| X1 | peptone 2.0 g, yeast extract 0.5 g, FePO4 · 4H2O 0.1 g, MgSO4 · 7H2O 0.5 g, CaCO3 0.2 g, NaCl 0.5 g, agar 18.0 g, ddwater 1,000 ml, pH 7.0 |
| R | peptone 10.0 g, yeast extract 5.0 g, maltose extract 5.0 g, casein amino acid 5.0 g, beef extract 2.0 g, glycerol 2.0 g, Tween-80 50.0 mg, MgSO4 · 7H2O 1.0 g, agar 18.0 g, ddwater 1,000 ml, pH 7.2-7.6 |
| L1 | NaCl 100.0 g, K2HPO4 5.0 g, MgSO4 · 7H2O 7.5 g, hydrolyzed casein 1.0 g, yeast extract 5.0 g, Na3C6H5O7 · 2H2O 3.0 g, FeSO4 · 7H2O 0.1 g, MnCl2 · 4H2O 0.1 g, ZnSO4 · 7H2O 0.1 g, agar 18.0 g, ddwater 1,000 ml, pH 7.0-8.0 |
| ISP2 | NaCl 100.0 g, dextrose 4.0 g, yeast extract 4.0 g, maltose extract 10.0 g, MgSO4 · 7H2O 0.5 g, CaCO3 2.0 g, FeSO4 10 mg, agar 18.0 g, ddwater 1,000 ml, pH 7.0-8.0 |
| GW1 | NaCl 100.0 g, casein 0.3 g, mannitol 1.0 g, NaHCO3 2.0 g, CaCO3 0.2 g, (NH4)2SO4 2.0 g, KNO3 2.0 g, K2HPO41.0 g, MgSO4 · 7H2O 2.0 g, FeSO4 10.0 mg, Trace-salt 10.0 mg/l, Agar 18.0 g, ddwater 1,000 ml, pH natural |
| DSM372 | NaCl 100.0 g, hydrolyzed casein 5.0 g, yeast extract 5.0 g, Na3C6H5O7 · 2H2O 3.0 g, Na2CO3 · 10H2O 8.0 g, NaC5H8NO4 1.0 g, KCl 2.0 g, MgSO4 · 7H2O 2.0 g, agar 18.0 g, ddwater 1,000 ml, pH natural |
| F1 | glycerol 5.0 g, alanine 3.0 g, arginine 1.0 g, (NH4)2SO4 2.64 g, KH2PO4 2.38 g, K2HPO4 5.65 g, MgSO4 · 7H2O 1.0 g, CuSO4 · 5H20 0.0064 g, FeSO4 · 7H2O 0.0011 g, MnCl2 · 4H2O 0.0079 g, ZnSO4 · 7H2O 0.0015 g, agar 18.0 g, ddwater 1,000 ml, pH 7.2-7.4 (add 25 μg/ml nalidixic acid and 100 μg/ml nystatin) |
| F2 | MgSO4 · 7H2O 0.5 g, CaCO3 0.2 g, FeSO4 10.0 mg, NaCl 0.5 g, MnCl2 · 4H2O 1.4 g, Na2MoO4 · 2H2O 0.39 g, Co(NO3)2 · 6H2O 0.025 g, ZnSO3 · 7H2O 0.222 g, NaHCO3 2.0 g, NaH2PO4 · 2H2O 0.05 g, agar 18.0 g, ddwater 1,000 ml, pH natural (add 25 μg/ml nalidixic acid and 100 μg/ml nystatin) |
| M1 | soluble starch 10.0 g, casein 0.3 g, KNO3 2.0 g, K2HPO4 2.0 g, MgSO4 · 7H2O 0.05 g, FeSO4 · 7H2O 0.01 g, agar 18.0 g, ddwater 1,000 ml, pH 7.2-7.4 (add 25 μg/ml nalidixic acid and 100 μg/ml nystatin) |
| M5 | yeast extract 4.0 g, soluble starch 15.0 g, K2HPO4 1.0g, FeSO4 · 7H2O 0.01 g, agar 18.0 g, ddwater 1,000 ml, pH 7.2-7.6 (add 25 μg/ml nalidixic acid and 100 μg/ml nystatin) |
| M6 | raffinose 10.0 g, L-histidine 1.0 g, MgSO4 · 7H2O 0.5 g, FeSO4 · 7H2O 0.01 g, agar 18.0 g, ddwater 1,000 ml, pH 7.2-7.4 (add 25 μg/ml nalidixic acid and 100 μg/ml nystatin) |
| M7 | L-aspartic acid 0.1 g, peptone 2.0 g, sodium propionate 4.0 g, FeSO4 · 7H2O 0.01 g, agar 18.0 g, ddwater 1,000 ml, pH 7.2-7.4 (add 25 μg/ml nalidixic acid and 100 μg/ml nystatin) |
| M8 | glycerine 6.0 ml, arginine 1.0 g, MgSO4 · 7H2O 0.5 g, agar 18.0 g, ddwater 1,000 ml, pH 7.2-7.4 (add 25 μg/ml nalidixic acid and 100 μg/ml nystatin) |
| HV | humic acid 1.0g, Na2HPO4 0.5 g, KCl 1.7 g, MgSO4 0.5 g, FeSO4 0.01 g, CaCO3 0.02 g, agar 18.0 g, ddwater 1,000 ml, pH 7.2-7.4 (add 25 μg/ml nalidixic acid and 100 μg/ml nystatin) |
| GS | soluble starch 20.0 g, NaCl 0.5 g, KNO3 1.0 g, K2HPO4 · 3H2O 0.5 g, MgSO4 · 7H2O 0.5 g, FeSO4 · 7H2O 0.01 g, agar 18.0 g, ddwater 1,000 ml, pH 7.4-7.6 (add 25 μg/ml nalidixic acid and 100 μg/ml nystatin) |
Fig. 1.The number and diversity of bacteria.
A) The numbers of bacteria isolated from different media at 4° and 25°. B) Diversity of bacteria isolated from different culture media. C) Diversity of bacteria isolated from different temperature. D) The numbers of dominant species isolated from 4° and 25°.
Genera distributed in each of the four phyla.
| Actinobacteria | Proteobacteria | Firmicutes | Bacteroidetes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Fig. 2.Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences of soil isolates and related species.
BLAST results based on 16S rRNA gene sequences of 77 bacterial species.
| Strain number | Name of strain having the highest 16S rRNA gene similarity | The highest similarity (%) |
|---|---|---|
| T74[ | 98.82 | |
| T203 | 99.82 | |
| T96[ | 98.62 | |
| T229[ | 98.74 | |
| T805 | 99.85 | |
| T763 | 100 | |
| T65 | 100 | |
| T94 | 100 | |
| T228[ | 99.34 | |
| T59 | 100 | |
| T115 | 99.6 | |
| T822 | 99.86 | |
| T230 | 100 | |
| T183[ | G | 98.9 |
| T64 | 100 | |
| T830[ | 98.60 | |
| T769[ | 99.72 | |
| T144 | 99.43 | |
| T145 | 100 | |
| T214[ | 99.6 | |
| T422 | 99.87 | |
| T823 | 99.73 | |
| T781 | 99.73 | |
| T146 | 99.88 | |
| T181[ | 98.9 | |
| T156 | 99.86 | |
| T489 | 99.55 | |
| T773 | 99.87 | |
| T804 | 99.73 | |
| T133 | 98.93 | |
| T226 | 99.63 | |
| T47 | 99.87 | |
| T206 | 99.87 | |
| T197[ | 98.74 | |
| T92 | 100 | |
| T786[ | 98.70 | |
| T62 | 99.47 | |
| T105[ | 98.01 | |
| T218 | 99.63 | |
| T608 | 99.07 | |
| T236 | 100 | |
| T808[ | 98.79 | |
| T209 | 100 | |
| T811 | 100 | |
| T274[ | 98.57 | |
| T63 | 100 | |
| T193[ | 99.34 | |
| T755 | 99.73 | |
| T776 | 100 | |
| T174[ | 99.34 | |
| T127[ | 99.32 | |
| T788 | 100 | |
| T185[ | 98.86 | |
| T93 | 99.87 | |
| T45 | 100 | |
| T61 | 100 | |
| T666 | 100 | |
| T313 | 100 | |
| T234 | 99.87 | |
| T130 | 99.87 | |
| T235 | 99.73 | |
| T690 | 99.47 | |
| T532 | 99.85 | |
| T674[ | 98.8 | |
| T296 | 99.46 | |
| T219 | 99.46 | |
| T426 | 99.6 | |
| T569 | 99.2 | |
| T348 | 99.46 | |
| T84 | 99.6 | |
| T581 | 100 | |
| T110[ | 98.97 | |
| T100 | 99.71 | |
| T111[ | 99.19 | |
| T160 | 99.18 | |
| T812 | 99.47 | |
| T134[ | 98.73 | |
– shown that the full length 16S rRNA gene of this bacterium was sequenced
The sequence analyses based on almost full-length of the 16S rRNA gene of six potential new species.
| Strain number | Name of strain having the highest 16S rRNA gene similarity | Separation medium | The highest similarity (%) | Separation temperature (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T96 | 98.62 | M5 | 25 | |
| T105 | 98.01 | M5 | 25 | |
| T274 | 98.57 | M8 | 25 | |
| T786 | 98.70 | R | 4 | |
| T808 | 98.79 | M5 | 4 | |
| T830 | 98.60 | F1 | 4 |
Fig. 3.Phylogenetic tree based on the16S rRNA gene sequences of new candidates and related species.
Fig. 4.The Clustal X analysis of strain T808.