Literature DB >> 33814794

Mullerian Malformations and Reconstructive Surgery: Clinicians' Approach.

Hiralal Konar1,2.   

Abstract

Mullerian malformations are not uncommon. Overall incidence ranges widely between 1 in 200 women and 4 in 100 women (Chan et al. in Hum Reprod Update 17:761-771, 2011; Grimbizis et al. in Hum Reprod 28:2032-2044, 2013). Other way, these observations suggest presently an increased number of Mullerian abnormalities are diagnosed with more details, following the use of newer diagnostic modalities. Most classifications that are available have limitations. Diagnosis was based on imaging studies that had low diagnostic accuracy. It was focused mainly on the anomalies of the uterus. Less is known about the anomalies of the cervix or the vagina in isolation or in combination with the utero-cervical and vaginal malformations. Improved diagnostic modalities and incorporation of assisted reproductive technology have improved the outcome further. Therefore, a more expanded classification needs to be introduced with wider criteria for the clinicians. This will make clinicians' approach for the management more simple. © Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical presentations; Diagnosis; Menstrual; Mullerian malformations; Reconstructive surgery; Sexual and reproductive functions

Year:  2021        PMID: 33814794      PMCID: PMC7960856          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-020-01400-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  17 in total

Review 1.  Genetics of the female reproductive ducts.

Authors:  J L Simpson
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1999-12-29

Review 2.  Embryological observations on the female genital tract.

Authors:  P Acién
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Term delivery rate after hysteroscopic metroplasty in patients with recurrent spontaneous abortion and T-shaped, arcuate and septate uterus.

Authors:  Evaldo Giacomucci; Emanuela Bellavia; Fabrizio Sandri; Antonio Farina; Giorgio Scagliarini
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2010-12-11       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Hysteroscopic metroplasty for the septate uterus: review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rafael F Valle; Geraldine E Ekpo
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.137

5.  The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  The pattern of pregnancy loss in women with congenital uterine anomalies and recurrent miscarriage.

Authors:  Sotirios H Saravelos; Karen A Cocksedge; Tin-Chiu Li
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 3.828

7.  Sexuality after sigmoid colpopoiesis in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser Syndrome.

Authors:  Pierre-Henri Communal; Marie Chevret-Measson; Francois Golfier; Daniel Raudrant
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 8.  The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies.

Authors:  Grigoris F Grimbizis; Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo; Sotirios H Saravelos; Stephan Gordts; Caterina Exacoustos; Dominique Van Schoubroeck; Carmina Bermejo; Nazar N Amso; Geeta Nargund; Dirk Timmerman; Apostolos Athanasiadis; Sara Brucker; Carlo De Angelis; Marco Gergolet; Tin Chiu Li; Vasilios Tanos; Basil Tarlatzis; Roy Farquharson; Luca Gianaroli; Rudi Campo
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 9.  The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review.

Authors:  Y Y Chan; K Jayaprakasan; J Zamora; J G Thornton; N Raine-Fenning; A Coomarasamy
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 15.610

10.  The ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies.

Authors:  Grigoris F Grimbizis; Stephan Gordts; Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo; Sara Brucker; Carlo De Angelis; Marco Gergolet; Tin-Chiu Li; Vasilios Tanos; Hans Brölmann; Luca Gianaroli; Rudi Campo
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2013-06-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.