BACKGROUND: The role of the lipidome as a biomarker for Parkinson's disease (PD) is a relatively new field that currently only focuses on PD diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: To identify a relevant lipidome signature for PD severity markers. METHODS: Disease severity of 149 PD patients was assessed by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The lipid composition of whole blood samples was analyzed, consisting of 517 lipid species from 37 classes; these included all major classes of glycerophospholipids, sphingolipids, glycerolipids, and sterols. To handle the high number of lipids, the selection of lipid species and classes was consolidated via analysis of interrelations between lipidomics and disease severity prediction using the random forest machine-learning algorithm aided by conventional statistical methods. RESULTS: Specific lipid classes dihydrosphingomyelin (dhSM), plasmalogen phosphatidylethanolamine (PEp), glucosylceramide (GlcCer), dihydro globotriaosylceramide (dhGB3), and to a lesser degree dihydro GM3 ganglioside (dhGM3), as well as species dhSM(20:0), PEp(38:6), PEp(42:7), GlcCer(16:0), GlcCer(24:1), dhGM3(22:0), dhGM3(16:0), and dhGB3(16:0) contribute to PD severity prediction of UPDRS III score. These, together with age, age at onset, and disease duration, also contribute to prediction of UPDRS total score. We demonstrate that certain lipid classes and species interrelate differently with the degree of severity of motor symptoms between men and women, and that predicting intermediate disease stages is more accurate than predicting less or more severe stages. CONCLUSION: Using machine-learning algorithms and methodologies, we identified lipid signatures that enable prediction of motor severity in PD. Future studies should focus on identifying the biological mechanisms linking GlcCer, dhGB3, dhSM, and PEp with PD severity.
BACKGROUND: The role of the lipidome as a biomarker for Parkinson's disease (PD) is a relatively new field that currently only focuses on PD diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: To identify a relevant lipidome signature for PD severity markers. METHODS: Disease severity of 149 PD patients was assessed by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The lipid composition of whole blood samples was analyzed, consisting of 517 lipid species from 37 classes; these included all major classes of glycerophospholipids, sphingolipids, glycerolipids, and sterols. To handle the high number of lipids, the selection of lipid species and classes was consolidated via analysis of interrelations between lipidomics and disease severity prediction using the random forest machine-learning algorithm aided by conventional statistical methods. RESULTS: Specific lipid classes dihydrosphingomyelin (dhSM), plasmalogen phosphatidylethanolamine (PEp), glucosylceramide (GlcCer), dihydro globotriaosylceramide (dhGB3), and to a lesser degree dihydro GM3 ganglioside (dhGM3), as well as species dhSM(20:0), PEp(38:6), PEp(42:7), GlcCer(16:0), GlcCer(24:1), dhGM3(22:0), dhGM3(16:0), and dhGB3(16:0) contribute to PD severity prediction of UPDRS III score. These, together with age, age at onset, and disease duration, also contribute to prediction of UPDRS total score. We demonstrate that certain lipid classes and species interrelate differently with the degree of severity of motor symptoms between men and women, and that predicting intermediate disease stages is more accurate than predicting less or more severe stages. CONCLUSION: Using machine-learning algorithms and methodologies, we identified lipid signatures that enable prediction of motor severity in PD. Future studies should focus on identifying the biological mechanisms linking GlcCer, dhGB3, dhSM, and PEp with PD severity.
Authors: Noemí Fabelo; Virginia Martín; Gabriel Santpere; Raquel Marín; Laia Torrent; Isidre Ferrer; Mario Díaz Journal: Mol Med Date: 2011-06-22 Impact factor: 6.354
Authors: Athanasios Tsanas; Max A Little; Patrick E McSharry; Jennifer Spielman; Lorraine O Ramig Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2012-01-09 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Samar M Hammad; Jason S Pierce; Farzan Soodavar; Kent J Smith; Mohammed M Al Gadban; Barbara Rembiesa; Richard L Klein; Yusuf A Hannun; Jacek Bielawski; Alicja Bielawska Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2010-07-21 Impact factor: 5.922
Authors: Michelle M Mielke; Walter Maetzler; Norman J Haughey; Veera V R Bandaru; Rodolfo Savica; Christian Deuschle; Thomas Gasser; Ann-Kathrin Hauser; Susanne Gräber-Sultan; Erwin Schleicher; Daniela Berg; Inga Liepelt-Scarfone Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-09-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Marie Grey; Christopher J Dunning; Ricardo Gaspar; Carl Grey; Patrik Brundin; Emma Sparr; Sara Linse Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2014-11-25 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Holly N Cukier; Hyunjin Kim; Anthony J Griswold; Simona G Codreanu; Lisa M Prince; Stacy D Sherrod; John A McLean; Derek M Dykxhoorn; Kevin C Ess; Peter Hedera; Aaron B Bowman; M Diana Neely Journal: NPJ Parkinsons Dis Date: 2022-06-29