| Literature DB >> 33814423 |
Unnur D Teitsdottir1, Skarphedinn Halldorsson2, Ottar Rolfsson2, Sigrun H Lund3, Maria K Jonsdottir4,5, Jon Snaedal6, Petur H Petersen1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Understanding how dysregulation in lipid metabolism relates to the severity of Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology might be critical in developing effective treatments.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; biomarkers; cerebrospinal fluid; inflammation; lipidomics
Year: 2021 PMID: 33814423 PMCID: PMC8203241 DOI: 10.3233/JAD-200964
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Alzheimers Dis ISSN: 1387-2877 Impact factor: 4.472
Fig. 1Flow diagram of sample selection and lipid profiling techniques applied to the analysis of CSF samples.
Subject demographics, CSF protein levels and cognitive scores by CSF profile
| CSF profile | All | |||
| Non-AD | AD | |||
| T-tau/ Aβ42≤0.52 | T-tau/ Aβ42 > 0.52 | |||
| Gender (M/F) | 16/10 | 16/18 | 0.27 | 32/28 |
| Age, y | 68 (46–85) | 70 (51–84) | 0.19 | 70 (46–85) |
| Education, y | 14 (9–20) | 13 (6–20) | 0.82 | 13 (6–20) |
| SCI/MCI/AD/LBD/PD | 10/13/0/2/1 | 3/10/20/1/0 | N/Ad | 13/23/20/3/1 |
| Aβ42 (pg/ml) | 770 (374–2332) | 470 (140–977) | N/Ae | 555 (140–2332) |
| T-tau (pg/ml) | 182 (100–722) | 429 (132–1086) | N/Ae | 290 (100–1086) |
| P-tau (pg/ml) | 45 (24–77) | 84 (30–144) | N/Ae | 58 (24–144) |
| NFL (ng/ml) | 2.0 (0.9–6.5) | 2.5 (1.2–5.3) | 0.052 | 2.2 (0.9–6.5) |
| YKL-40 (ng/ml) | 165 (83–399) | 189 (124–367) | 0.35 | 183 (83–399) |
| S100B (pg/ml) | 215 (132–335) | 240 (129–509) | 0.06 | 228 (129–509) |
| GFAP (ng/ml) | 1.1 (0.1–7.1) | 1.3 (0.5–21.3) | 0.11 | 1.3 (0.1–21.3) |
| MMSE, score | 28 (24–30) | 28 (24–30) | 0.87 | 28 (24–30) |
| RAVLT immediate recall, scorec | 34.5 (23–66) | 27 (13–58) | 0.009 | 30 (13–66) |
| RAVLT delayed recall, scorec | 4.5 (0–15) | 1 (0–12) | < 0.001 | 3 (0–15) |
| Story –immediate recall, score | 13.5 (5–17) | 8 (1–21) | 0.003 | 10 (1–21) |
| Story –delayed recall, score | 11.5 (1–19) | 6 (0–19) | 0.002 | 7 (0–19) |
AD, Alzheimer’s disease; CSF, Cerebrospinal fluid; LBD, Lewy body dementia; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; N/A, Not applicable; PD, Parkinson‘s disease; RAVLT, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test; SCI, subjective cognitive impairment. Values are shown as median (range) or as numbers per group. aMann-Whitney U non-parametric test used for continuous variables and Chi-Square test for the categorical variable (gender). bRaw values (neither log2-transformed nor autoscaled). cAnalysis based on 59 subjects, one missing value. dp-values not applicable for clinical diagnosis due to CSF profiles being part of the diagnostic criteria for AD. ep-values not applicable for Aβ42 and tau due to their values used for defining CSF profiles.
Fig. 2Frequencies of m/z features significantly distinguishing between CSF profiles (AD and non-AD) in both discovery and validation sets (p < 0.05) after 1000 bootstrap replications. A total of eight features with frequencies higher than 200 (20%) were selected for more detailed identification.
LipidBlast annotations of the eight selected m/z features. Levels for each feature compared between CSF AD and non-AD profile groups
| Feature /peak (m/z) | Average RT (min) | Ionization mode | Annotated lipid species | Proposed structure | CSF profilea | ||
| Non-AD | AD | ||||||
| 607.472 | 7.74 | (-) | FAHFA 40:7 | FAHFA (18:5/22:2) | –0.50 | 0.25 | < 0.001 |
| 607.375 | 6.00 | (-) | MGDG 20:0 | MGDG (10:0/10:0) | –0.54 | –0.05 | < 0.001 |
| 579.441 | 7.24 | (-) | FAHFA 38:7 | FAHFA (18:4/20:3) | –0.42 | 0.27 | < 0.001 |
| 663.441 | 6.15 | (-) | MGDG 24:0 | MGDG (10:0/14:0) | –0.28 | 0.38 | < 0.001 |
| 564.537 | 7.50 | (-) | Cer 36:1 | C18 Cer (d18:1/18:0) | –0.48 | 0.31 | 0.002 |
| 783.496 | 6.65 | (-) | PMeOH 42:9 | PMeOH (20:3/22:6) | –0.36 | 0.29 | 0.003 |
| 664.386 | 6.21 | (-) | PE 32:6e | PE (16:23/16:4) | –0.10 | 0.36 | 0.003 |
| 635.503 | 8.07 | (-) | FAHFA 42:7 | FAHFA (20:3/22:4) | –0.56 | –0.11 | 0.005 |
m/z, mass-to-charge ratio; RT, retention time; Cer, ceramide; FAHFA, fatty acid ester of hydroxyl fatty acid; MGDG, monogalactosyldiacyl-glycerol; PE, phosphatidylethanolamines; PMeOH, phosphatidyl methanol. aBased on normalized peak area arbitrary units (A.U.), log2-transformed and autoscaled before analysis. bMann-Whitney U non-parametric test used.
Fig. 3Comparison in levels of CSF C18 ceramide by CSF profile (non-AD and AD). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 significance according to Mann-Whitney U non-parametric test. Based on normalized peak area arbitrary units (A.U.), log2-transformed and autoscaled before analysis. The lower and upper horizontal lines of the boxplot correspond to the 25th and the 75th centiles and the middle line to the median. Levels of CSF C18 ceramide were significantly higher (p = 0.002) among participants with a CSF AD profile compared to those without.
Linear regression estimates (unadjusted and adjusted) for the association between various measures and levels of CSF C18 ceramide
| CSF C18 ceramide (A.U.)a | ||||||
| Unadjusted model | Adjusted model* | |||||
| St. β | St. β | |||||
| Age, y | –0.02 | 0.902 | –0.05 | 0.765 | ||
| Education, y | –0.05 | 0.688 | –0.07 | 0.596 | ||
| Aβ42 (pg/ml) | –0.35 | 0.006 | –0.36 | 0.007 | ||
| T-tau (pg/ml) | 0.30 | 0.018 | 0.41 | 0.005 | ||
| P-tau (pg/ml) | 0.17 | 0.188 | 0.21 | 0.129 | ||
| T-tau/Aβ42 | 0.44 | < 0.001 | 0.52 | < 0.001 | ||
| NFL (ng/ml) | 0.03 | 0.835 | 0.05 | 0.782 | ||
| YKL-40 (ng/ml) | 0.11 | 0.411 | 0.25 | 0.194 | ||
| S100B (pg/ml) | 0.37 | 0.004 | 0.51 | 0.001 | ||
| GFAP (ng/ml) | 0.22 | 0.087 | 0.26 | 0.087 | ||
| RAVLT immediate recall, scoreb | –0.02 | 0.893 | –0.01 | 0.928 | ||
| RAVLT delayed recall, scoreb | –0.18 | 0.339 | –0.29 | 0.095 | ||
| Story immediate recall, score | –0.13 | 0.356 | –0.14 | 0.345 | ||
| Story delayed recall, score | –0.13 | 0.305 | –0.15 | 0.335 | ||
A.U., arbitrary units; RAVLT, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test. Numbers present standardized beta coefficients (st.β). *Adjusted for age, gender, and years of education. aValues log2-transformed and autoscaled before analysis. bAnalysis based on 59 subjects, with one missing.
Fig. 4Pearson’s correlations between CSF levels of a) Aβ42, b) T-tau, c) T-tau/ Aβ42, d) S100B and CSF C18 ceramide. Normalized peak area arbitrary units (A.U.). All CSF measures were log2-transformed and autoscaled before analysis. C18 ceramide levels significantly correlated with levels of the core AD markers Aβ42, T-tau, and inflammatory marker S100B.
Pearson‘s correlations between selected CSF markers and levels of CSF C18 ceramide within CSF profiles
| CSF C18 ceramide (A.U.)a | ||||
| CSF non-AD profile | CSF AD profile | |||
| r | r | |||
| Aβ42 (pg/ml) | –0.04 | 0.86 | –0.25 | 0.15 |
| T-tau (pg/ml) | 0.23 | 0.25 | –0.20 | 0.25 |
| P-tau (pg/ml) | –0.20 | 0.34 | –0.13 | 0.47 |
| T-tau/Aβ42 | 0.32 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.67 |
| NFL (ng/ml) | –0.09 | 0.68 | –0.07 | 0.70 |
| YKL-40 (ng/ml) | 0.08 | 0.70 | 0.02 | 0.90 |
| S100B (pg/ml) | 0.39 | 0.052 | 0.21 | 0.24 |
| GFAP (ng/ml) | 0.16 | 0.43 | 0.17 | 0.34 |
A.U., arbitrary units. aValues log2-transformed and autoscaled before analysis.