Literature DB >> 33813949

Addressing prioritization in healthcare amidst a global pandemic.

Craig Mitton1,2, Cam Donaldson3, Francois Dionne2, Stuart Peacock4,5,6.   

Abstract

Trade-offs abound in healthcare yet depending on where one stands relative to the stages of a pandemic, choice making may be more or less constrained. During the early stages of COVID-19 when there was much uncertainty, healthcare systems faced greater constraints and focused on the singular criterion of "flattening the curve." As COVID-19 progressed and the first wave diminished (relatively speaking depending on the jurisdiction), more opportunities presented for making explicit choices between COVID and non-COVID patients. Then, as the second wave surged, again decision makers were more constrained even as more information and greater understanding developed. Moving out of the pandemic to recovery, choice making becomes paramount as there are no set rules to lean back into historical patterns of resource allocation. In fact, the opportunity at hand, when using explicit tools for priority setting based on economic and ethical principles, is significant.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33813949     DOI: 10.1177/08404704211002539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthc Manage Forum        ISSN: 0840-4704


  2 in total

1.  Priority setting and equity in COVID-19 pandemic plans: a comparative analysis of 18 African countries.

Authors:  Lydia Kapiriri; Suzanne Kiwanuka; Godfrey Biemba; Claudia Velez; S Donya Razavi; Julia Abelson; Beverley M Essue; Marion Danis; Susan Goold; Mariam Noorulhuda; Elysee Nouvet; Lars Sandman; Iestyn Williams
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.344

2.  Vaccine nationalism will persist: global public goods need effective engagement of global citizens.

Authors:  Stuart J Peacock
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 4.185

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.