Literature DB >> 338129

Recombination values and their errors.

L Butler.   

Abstract

Two four-point testcrosses comprising 87,000 tomato plants were grown and the data collected from 28 subgroups. Each subgroup consisted of 2,000 or 5,000 plants and should give a valid estimate of the three recombination values. The 28 values for each interval give more outlyers (23% are outside the 95% limits set by the standard deviation calculated by the binomial formula square root of p q/n) than would be expected by chance. If each subgroup was regarded as the control and the other groups tested against this, then 42% of the time the two subgroups would be significantly different. It is suggested that there are many cases in the literature where this comparison has been made and the significant difference wrongly ascribed to treatment. While the causes of these changes in recombination value are unknown and therefore uncontrollable, they must be anticipated in all such studies. Control and treatment must be replicated enough that chance extreme values will not be attributed to treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 338129     DOI: 10.1139/g77-055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Genet Cytol        ISSN: 0008-4093


  3 in total

1.  Recombination rates of soybean varieties from different periods of introduction and release.

Authors:  T W Pfeiffer
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Variability of recombination frequencies in the Iowa Stiff Stalk Synthetic (Zea mays L.).

Authors:  A Fatmi; C G Poneleit; T W Pfeiffer
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Repeatability and heritability of divergent recombination frequencies in the Iowa Stiff Stalk Synthetic (Zea mays L.).

Authors:  R G Hadad; T W Pfeiffer; C G Poneleit
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.699

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.