Pali P Singh1, Chen Yu2, Rose Mathew2, Victor L Perez3, Daniel R Saban4. 1. Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, Duke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA. 3. Foster Center for Ocular Immunology, Department of Ophthalmology, Duke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. 4. Department of Ophthalmology, Duke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA; Foster Center for Ocular Immunology, Department of Ophthalmology, Duke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA; Department of Immunology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. Electronic address: Daniel.saban@duke.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The etiology of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is incompletely understood, despite being a common ophthalmic condition and an area of unmet medical need. It is characterized by an insufficiency in glandular provision of specialized lipids (meibum) to the tear film and is a major cause of dry eye. Work in the allergic eye disease (AED) mouse model has revealed an immunopathogenic role in MGD causation, now raising interest in the applicability of immunomodulatory therapies. As such, we herein ask whether inhibition of lymphocyte function associated antigen (LFA)-1/intracellular adhesion molecules (ICAM)-1 signaling via topical lifitegrast administration has a therapeutic effect on MGD in AED mice. METHODS: Mice were induced with AED by i.p. injection of ovalbumin (OVA) mixed with alum and pertussis toxin, followed 2 weeks later by once daily topical OVA challenges for 7 days. Mice were treated topically with 5% lifitegrast ophthalmic solution or vehicle (PBS) 30 min prior to challenge. We developed a clinical ranking method to assess MGD severity, and also scored clinical allergy. Conjunctivae and draining lymph nodes were collected for flow cytometry. RESULTS: Topical lifitegrast significantly inhibited clinical MGD severity, which was associated with diminished pathogenic TH17 cell and neutrophil numbers in the conjunctiva. No significant change in conjunctival TH2 cells or eosinophils, and only marginal differences in ocular allergy were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In AED mice, lifitegrast inhibited MGD severity marked by a reduction in select immune populations in the conjunctiva. Our findings warrant future examination of lifitegrast in the treatment of patients with forms of MGD.
PURPOSE: The etiology of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is incompletely understood, despite being a common ophthalmic condition and an area of unmet medical need. It is characterized by an insufficiency in glandular provision of specialized lipids (meibum) to the tear film and is a major cause of dry eye. Work in the allergic eye disease (AED) mouse model has revealed an immunopathogenic role in MGD causation, now raising interest in the applicability of immunomodulatory therapies. As such, we herein ask whether inhibition of lymphocyte function associated antigen (LFA)-1/intracellular adhesion molecules (ICAM)-1 signaling via topical lifitegrast administration has a therapeutic effect on MGD in AED mice. METHODS: Mice were induced with AED by i.p. injection of ovalbumin (OVA) mixed with alum and pertussis toxin, followed 2 weeks later by once daily topical OVA challenges for 7 days. Mice were treated topically with 5% lifitegrast ophthalmic solution or vehicle (PBS) 30 min prior to challenge. We developed a clinical ranking method to assess MGD severity, and also scored clinical allergy. Conjunctivae and draining lymph nodes were collected for flow cytometry. RESULTS: Topical lifitegrast significantly inhibited clinical MGD severity, which was associated with diminished pathogenic TH17 cell and neutrophil numbers in the conjunctiva. No significant change in conjunctival TH2 cells or eosinophils, and only marginal differences in ocular allergy were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In AED mice, lifitegrast inhibited MGD severity marked by a reduction in select immune populations in the conjunctiva. Our findings warrant future examination of lifitegrast in the treatment of patients with forms of MGD.
Authors: Min Zhong; Thomas R Gadek; Minna Bui; Wang Shen; John Burnier; Kenneth J Barr; Emily J Hanan; Johan D Oslob; Chul H Yu; Jiang Zhu; Michelle R Arkin; Marc J Evanchik; W Mike Flanagan; Ute Hoch; Jennifer Hyde; Saileta Prabhu; Jeffrey A Silverman; Jasmin Wright Journal: ACS Med Chem Lett Date: 2012-01-31 Impact factor: 4.345
Authors: Sharee A Basdeo; Deborah Cluxton; Jamal Sulaimani; Barry Moran; Mary Canavan; Carl Orr; Douglas J Veale; Ursula Fearon; Jean M Fletcher Journal: J Immunol Date: 2017-02-06 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Youjin Lee; Amit Awasthi; Nir Yosef; Francisco J Quintana; Sheng Xiao; Anneli Peters; Chuan Wu; Markus Kleinewietfeld; Sharon Kunder; David A Hafler; Raymond A Sobel; Aviv Regev; Vijay K Kuchroo Journal: Nat Immunol Date: 2012-09-09 Impact factor: 25.606
Authors: Payal Khandelwal; Tomas Blanco-Mezquita; Parisa Emami; Hyun Soo Lee; Nancy J Reyes; Rose Mathew; Randy Huang; Daniel R Saban Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-05-14 Impact factor: 3.240