| Literature DB >> 33810571 |
Bodhi R Manu1, Anju Gupta1, Ahalapitiya H Jayatissa1.
Abstract
This paper aims to provide a theoretical and experimental understanding of the importance of novel 2D materials in solid-film lubrication, along with modulating strategies adopted so far to improve their performance for spacecraft and industrial applications. The mechanisms and the underlying physics of 2D materials are reviewed with experimental results. This paper covers some of the widely investigated solid lubricants such as MoS2, graphene, and boron compounds, namely h-BN and boric acid. Solid lubricants such as black phosphorus that have gained research prominence are also discussed regarding their application as additives in polymeric materials. The effects of process conditions, film deposition parameters, and dopants concentration on friction and wear rate are discussed with a qualitative and quantitative emphasis that are supported with adequate examples and application areas and summarized in the form of graphs and tables for easy readability. The use of advanced manufacturing methods such as powder metallurgy and sintering to produce solid lubricants of superior tribological performance and the subsequent economic gain from their development as a substitute for liquid lubricant are also evaluated.Entities:
Keywords: 2D materials; solid lubricants; thin films; tribology
Year: 2021 PMID: 33810571 PMCID: PMC8036793 DOI: 10.3390/ma14071630
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Schematic of different 2D materials covered in this review [19,20,21].
Figure 2The pie chart shows the research conducted on different solid lubricants from 2000 to 2020; source: Web of Science database, 2000 to 2020. Keywords used in the search: Title = (“solid lubricant” OR “solid-lubricant composite” OR “self-lubricating solid lubricant” OR “polymer, ceramic, and metal matrix composites” and “tribological properties” OR “friction” OR “wear” OR “antifriction”) AND Topic = (“powder metallurgy” OR “compression molding” OR “sintering” OR “UV curing”). The total number of publications analyzed equals 334.
Figure 3Different microscale mechanisms of frictional energy dissipation: (a) Wear mechanism; (b) Molecular deformation; (c) Thermal Effect; (d) Bonding; and (e) Environmental effect [28].
Figure 4The worn surface morphology of ZrO2-toughened Al2O3 particles reinforced high-chromium cast iron (HCCI) matrix composite at different loads: (a) 300 N-low magnification; (b) 300 N-high magnification; (c) 900 N-low magnification; and (d) 300 N-high magnification [32].
Figure 5Atomistic simulation result of frictional force( Ff ) versus contact force (Fc) for suspended graphene interlayer adhesion: (a) tip sample empirical interlayer adhesion, and (b) when tip sample interaction Vander Waal’s force increased by 4 times that of (a). Inserts show analytical estimates of Ff verses Fc different spherical tip diameters. (Here, susp indicates suspended graphene whereas 3-D indicates isotropic graphite [34].
Figure 6Atomistic simulation result of frictional force versus full range sweep of contact force for suspended graphene interlayer adhesion: (a) for empirical interlayer adhesion at a constant Van der Waal’s force and (b) for empirical interlayer adhesion when Van der Waal’s forces are increased by 4 times that of (a). (Here, susp. indicates suspended graphene whereas 3-D indicates isotropic graphite [34].
Figure 7Typical potential energy curve showing the shape of the well with increase in melting point [39].
Figure 8Schematic showing the energy interaction during endothermic and exothermic reactions: (a) Endothermic reaction- energy of products is higher than energy of reactants and (b) Exothermic reaction- energy of products is less than energy of reactants [42].
Binding energy and melting temperature of different bond types [39].
| Bonding Type | Substance | Binding Energy (Kcal/mol) | Melting |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ionic | NaCl | 153 | 801 |
| MgO | 239 | 1000 | |
| Si | 108 | 1410 | |
| Covalent | C | 170 | >3550 |
| Hg | 16 | −39 | |
| Al | 77 | 660 | |
| Metallic | Fe | 97 | 1538 |
| W | 203 | 3410 | |
| Van der Waals | Ar | 1.8 | −189 |
| Cl2 | 7.4 | −101 |
Effect of environmental factors on the lubricating properties of some known solid lubricants.
| Humidity |
MoS2 and diamond like carbon (DLC) friction increases with humidity Graphene, h-BN, and ultra-nanocrystalline diamond (UNCD) friction decrease with humidity due to saturation of dangling bonds [ In dry condition (0% relative humidity, RH) hydrogenated DLC shows super lubricity (COF < 0.01) due to shear-induced structural changes [ |
| Nitrogen |
h-BN loses lubricating property hydrogenated DLC show super lubricity with trace water content (120 ppm) [ |
| Oxygen |
h-BN loses lubricating property due to oxidation MoS2 is also susceptible to atomic oxygen and decreases the lubricating effect |
| Hydrogen |
Improves the tribological performance of amorphous nonhydrogenated DLC by hydrogen termination For hydrogenated DLC, the presence of small amount of water (120 ppm) increases friction [ |
| Temperature |
For MoS2 COF decreases with the increase in temperature due to desorption of water up to 300 °C. At 400 °C, oxidation of MoS2 causes deterioration of tribological properties WS2 and WSe2 can resist oxidation up to 700 °C |
| Vacuum |
h-BN loses lubricating property DLC and diamond shows high friction due to desorption of hydrogen [ water desorption deteriorates the lubricating property of graphite and graphene |
Figure 9(a) Schematic of commensurate and incommensurate sliding of one graphene layer over another [71]; (b) variation of nanoscale friction with respect to the change in relative angle of rotation [69]; and (c) interaction energy as a function of rotation angle. Negative interaction energy signifies attractive forces and increase in friction increases [71].
Figure 10Incommensurate heterostructure interface sliding of multilayer graphene-coated microsphere (GMS) on graphene substrate using tipless mode of atomic force microscope (AFM) (a) isometric view and (b) schematic of atomic force microscopy of GMS sliding on graphene layers (After [72]).
Figure 11(a) Sliding friction curve and (b) mean coefficient of friction as a function of Ti content for sputter-deposited Ti/MoS2 films [120].
Figure 12Friction coefficient and wear rate on sputter deposited MoS2/Cr composite film as a function of Cr content at different humidity levels: (a) variation friction coefficient with relative humidity and (b) variation of wear rate with relative humidity [122].
Figure 13(a) MoS2 layer and (b) substitution of the sulfur atom by selenide leads to a curved structure (after [128]). This increases interlayer distance and reduces friction.
Figure 14Some publications on co-deposited and multilayer MoS2 and WS2 films. [115,119,120,122,123,124,126,134,135].
Figure 15The range of friction coefficient and wear rate for carbon-based films and sputter-deposited transition metal sulfides and di-selenides films: (a) Friction coefficient range for carbon-based films; (b) Wear rate range for carbon-based film; (c) Friction coefficient range for sputter-deposited transition metal sulfides and di-selenides films; and (d) Wear rate range for sputter-deposited transition metal sulfides and di-selenides films [102,140,141,142,143,144].
Figure 16Structure of h-BN and boric acid: (a) hexagonal boron nitride and (b) boric acid [165].
Thermal stability and temperature range of application of some solid lubricants’ [165,168,171].
| Material | Temperature Range (°C) | Temperature of Thermal Stability (°C) | Friction Coefficient |
|---|---|---|---|
| MoS2 | −184–400 | 350 | 0.05–0.25 |
| WS2 | −184–454 | 425 | 0.05–0.25 |
| Graphite | −184–650 | 500 | 0.1–0.3 |
| h-BN | −184–538 | 700 | 0.1–0.2 |
Figure 17Relationship between film coverage and friction coefficient as a function of solid-lubricant content for MoS2 films [21].
Some publications on using matrix composites for solid lubrication from 2000 to 2020.
| Publication | Matrix | Lubricant | Parameters | Important Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper |
Graphite from 10 wt.% to 0 wt.% h-BN from 0 wt.% to 10 wt.% |
Block-on-ring wear tester Counter surface: AISI52100 bearing steel |
The lubrication effects of graphite are superior to those of h-BN. Added graphite with low contents of h-BN can stabilize friction and wear properties COF increased from 0.35 to 0.55 with an increase in load from 50 to 125 N | |
| Copper | NbSe2 nanofiber |
Ball-on-disk, 50–70% RH Counter surface: 440-C stainless steel |
15 wt.% NbSe2 nanofibers showed a very low coefficient of friction of 0.1487 | |
| Copper | Ni/NbSe2 |
Ball-on-disk Counter surface: GCr15 |
15 wt.% Ni/NbSe2 showed the lowest friction coefficient (0.16) and wear rate (4.1 × 10 −5 mm3 N−1 m−1) | |
| Cu-X SiC wt.% (X = 0, 5, 10, and 15 wt.%) | Gr at 5 and 10 wt.% |
Pin-on-disc |
10 wt.% gr and 15 wt.% SiC best result | |
| Cu-20 vol.% silica | 10 vol.% of MoS2
|
Disc-on-pad dynamometer, 70% RH Counter surface: gray cast iron disc |
MoS2 is the most effective lubricant with COF = 0.18−0.3 for sliding speed for 3–9 m/s followed by, graphite, and h-BN | |
| Nickel | Ag = 12.5 wt.% |
Ball-on-disk, RT to 800 °C Counter surface: Si3N4 ceramic ball |
0.5 wt.% graphite exhibited the lowest COF at different testing temperatures except at 800 °C. The composite with 2.0 wt.% graphite showed the lowest at 800 °C | |
| Nickel | h-BN=1.25 wt.% |
Experiments conducted from 25 °C -500 °C |
The encapsulation of h-BN with nano-Cu increased the h-BN content in the coating COF reduced from 0.48 to 0.35 from 25 °C to 500 °C | |
| Ni Cr 80–20 wt.% | MoS2
|
Pin-on-disk Counter surface: steel disk (Cr12MoV) |
10% MoS2 + Ni + Cr (80–20 wt.%) showed best result with COF=0.02 | |
| WC-Ni-Cr88 wt.% WC, 11 wt.% Ni and 1 wt.% Cr | WS2= 5 wt.% |
Ball-on-disk Counter surfaces: WC-Ni balls |
Composite sintered at 950 °C under 250 MPa showed best COF = 0.13 | |
| Ni | CaF2 20% |
Pin-on-disc Counter surface: Inconel 625-alloy |
COF =0.75 to 0.45 from room to 600 °C | |
| Fe-0.3C-2Ni based composites | WS2 (3, 5, 7 and 9 wt.%) |
The composite with the highest amount of WS2 (9 wt.%) showed the lowest coefficient of friction (0.47) | ||
| PEEK | micro and nano MoS2, WS2 |
Pin-on-disc Counter surface: stainless steel pin (100Cr6). |
Friction reduced from 0.6 to 0.4 with the addition of micro and nano MoS2, WS2 | |
| Al2O3 – 15 wt.% ZrO2 (AZ) | 3 wt.% of CaF2, BaF2, MoS2, WS2, h-BN, or graphite |
Scratch testing at 27N |
AZ COF=0.068 CaF2 COF=0.043 BaF2 COF=0.082 MoS2 COF=0.086 WS2 COF=0.093 h-BN COF=0.086 Graphite COF=0.121 | |
| M50 steel | TiO2 10 wt.% |
Pin-on-disk Counter surfaces: Si3N4 balls |
The tribological performance of TiO2/G was the best It decreased from 0.43 to 0.2 from 25–450 °C Pure M50 had a COF of 0.8 | |
| Tin-bronze | Graphite, MoS2 or PTFE |
Contact pressure = 5 MPa Sliding velocity = 0.16 m/s Testing time = 8 h |
PTFE 20 wt.% and graphite 40 wt.%. showed the best result with COF=0.13 Wear rate also reduced by three orders of magnitude for the above sample | |
| Fe–Cu 5 wt.%–Sn3 wt.% | MoS2 (0-3 wt.%) |
Ball-on-disc Counter surface EN-8 steel |
Increasing MoS2 content from 0 to 3 wt.% the coefficient of friction decreased from 0.85 to 0.25. |