| Literature DB >> 33810378 |
Chengbing Yuan1, Yan Zhang1, Jinshui Yao1, Qinze Liu1, Fan-Gong Kong1.
Abstract
Herein, a synthetic strategy for a rough microsphere Cr(VI)-adsorbent via the reaction of tannic acid (TA) and 1,6-hexanediamine (HA) and using polyethylene glycol (PEG) as surface modifier was presented. This adsorbent was characterized by a Fourier Transform Infrared spectrometer (FTIR), thermogravimetic analysis (TGA), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), etc. Certain factors, including contact time, PEG@poly(tannin-1,6-hexanediamine) (PEG@PTHA) dosage, initial concentration, and experimental temperature affecting the Cr(VI) adsorption performance of adsorbent were explored. PEG@PTHA can adsorb Cr and the Cr(VI) was reduced up to Cr(III) due to the existence of phenolic hydroxyl groups. Its adsorption capacity can reach up to 300 mg/g within 10 min and approximately 100% removal percentage below the initial concentration of 100 mg/L. Its behavior matched well with the Langmuir isotherm model and pseudo-second-order kinetic model. A PEG@PTHA adsorbent with maximum adsorption capacity (450 mg/g) has great prospects in Cr(VI)-sewage treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Cr(VI) removal; polyethylene glycol; tannin-amine composite
Year: 2021 PMID: 33810378 PMCID: PMC8037244 DOI: 10.3390/polym13071035
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Schematic diagram of preparation procedure and possible preparation mechanism of the PEG@PTHA composite adsorbent.
Figure 2(a) SEM image of PTHA, (b) SEM image PEG@PTHA, (c) partial enlarged SEM image of PEG@PTHA, (d) EDS image of used PEG@PTHA.
Figure 3(a) FTIR spectrogram of HA, TA PEG, and PEG@PTHA, (b) FT-IR spectrogram of Fresh PEG@PTHA and used PEG@PTHA, (c) TGA curve of PEG@PTHA, PTHA, and PEG.
Figure 4(a) effects of contact time (0–48 h, C0 = 200 mg/L, T = 303 K, dos = 25 mg, V = 100 mL, pH = 2), (b) the difference of removal rate between PTHA and PEG@PTHA (C0 = 60 mg/L, pH = 2, T = 303 K, dos = 25 mg, V = 100 mL), (c) effect of initial concentration (C0 = 60–160 mg/L, T = 303 K, dos = 25 mg, t = 24 h, V = 100 mL), (d) effect of different adsorbent dosage (10–50 mg, C0 = 200 mg/L, T = 303 K, V = 100 mL, pH = 2), (e) effect of PH value (C0 = 200 mg/L, T = 303 K, dos = 25 mg, V = 100 mL, t = 24 h), (f) effect of different environmental temperature (C0 = 200 mg/L, dos = 25 mg, V = 100 mL, t = 24 h).
The parameters of isotherm models for removal of Cr by PEG@PTHA.
| Langmuir Isotherm Model | Freundlich Isotherm Model | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cr(VI) | 1.08 | 362 | 0.99393 | 197 | 0.23169 | 0.90842 |
The parameters of the kinetic models for removal of Cr by PEG@PTHA.
| Pseudo-First-Order | Pseudo-Second-Order | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cr(VI) | 0.00279 | 229 | 0.97335 | 0.0000544 | 458 | 0.99293 |
Figure 5(a) Langmuir isotherm model and Freundlich isotherm model, (b) The intra-particle diffusion model, (c) Pseudo-second-order model, (d) Pseudo-first-order model.
Thermodynamic Parameters of Cr(VI) Adsorption on PEG@PTHA microsphere.
| Temperature (K) | Δ | Δ | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 293 | −1.36 | ||
| 303 | −2.56 | 35.5 | 1.68 |
| 313 | −4.17 |
Figure 6The effect of competing ions on the removal behavior towards Cr(VI).
Figure 7(a) the XPS analysis of fresh PEG@PTHA and used PEG@PTHA, (b) XPS Cr2p spectrogram on the used PEG@PTHA, (c) conjectural mechanism of adsorption.
Comparison of adsorption capacity with other adsorbents from previous studies.
| Adsorbent | Adsorption Capacity | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| lignin–graphene oxide composite nanospheres | 154 mg/g | [ |
| two-dimensional (2D) Ti3C2Tx MXene nanosheets | 104 mg/g | [ |
| functionalized tannin-chitosan bentonite composite | 197 mg/g | [ |
| Nitrogen-Doped Carboxylated Porous Carbon | 104 mg/g | [ |