| Literature DB >> 33810294 |
Trinidad Montero-Vilchez1,2, Luis Salvador-Rodriguez1,2, Andrea Rodriguez-Tejero1,2, Manuel Sanchez-Diaz1,2, Salvador Arias-Santiago1,2,3, Alejandro Molina-Leyva1,2,3,4.
Abstract
There are scarce data available regarding the impact of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) on fertility, course and outcome of pregnancy and risk associated with treatments. The aims of this study are (1) to describe the clinical profile of HS women of childbearing age with and without accomplished reproductive desires and (2) to describe the prescribed treatments based on the fulfillment of reproductive intentions. We conducted a prospective observational study that included 104 HS women of childbearing age, 50.96% (53/104) with unfulfilled reproductive desires. These women were younger (29.08 vs. 42.06 years, p < 0.001), less frequently married and higher educated than women with fulfilled reproductive desires. Their age of disease onset was lower, but disease duration was shorter, in concordance with a lower International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) and lower number of draining tunnels. Combined oral contraceptives were more frequently prescribed in women with unfulfilled reproductive desires (30.19% vs. 9.80%, p = 0.013) while biologics were less used in this group (3.77% vs. 13.73%, p = 0.08). In conclusion, a higher educational level and an earlier disease onset, with potential implications in finding a partner, may make the fulfillment of reproductive desires difficult for patients with HS. This study could help clinicians to achieve a better understanding of the specific characteristics of HS during childbearing age and consider reproductive desires when making treatment decisions.Entities:
Keywords: acne inversa; hidradenitis suppurativa; pregnancy; reproductive behavior
Year: 2021 PMID: 33810294 PMCID: PMC8066603 DOI: 10.3390/life11040277
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Life (Basel) ISSN: 2075-1729
Figure 1Flowchart of the participants.
Demographic and clinical features of patients based on fulfillment of reproductive desires.
| Variables | Women with Fulfilled Reproductive Desires (N = 51) | Women with Unfulfilled |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 42.06 (SD 6.46) | 29.08 (SD 8.90) | <0.001 * |
|
| <0.001 * | ||
|
| 30 (58.82%) | 44 (83.02%) | 0.007 * |
|
| 26 (50.98%) | 19 (35.85%) | 0.120 |
|
| 32.64 (SD 7.61) | 28.56 (SD 5.29) | 0.002 * |
|
| 31 (60.78%) | 23 (43.40%) | 0.076 |
|
| 9 (17.65%) | 12 (22.64%) | 0.526 |
|
| 24.63 (SD 10.96) | 18.23 (SD 7.16) | 0.006 * |
|
| 17.43 (SD 9.29) | 10.85 (SD 6.36) | <0.001 * |
|
| 28 (54.90%) | 27 (50.94%) | 0.686 |
|
| 0.010 * | ||
|
| 1.86 (SD 2.07) | 2.68 (SD 3.24) | 0.130 |
|
| 1.14 (SD 1.58) | 0.49 (SD 0.80) | 0.009 * |
|
| 7.33 (SD 6.75) | 5.51 (SD 5.19) | 0.124 |
|
| 1.90 (SD 1.06) | 1.60 (SD 1.00) | 0.145 |
|
| 1.96 (SD 1.57) | 1.68 (SD 1.36) | 0.330 |
|
| 0.98 (SD 1.21) | 1.04 (SD 1.81) | 0.850 |
AN: total abscess and inflammatory nodule count; BMI: body mass index; IHS4: International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System. Data are expressed as relative (absolute) frequencies and means (standard deviation (SD). The Student’s t test for independent samples was used to compare continuous variables and the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate, were applied to compare categoric data. Two-tailed * p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant in all tests.
Treatments of the sample based on fulfillment of reproductive desires, pregnancy category, washing time recommendation to get pregnant, possible impact on pregnancy and fertility.
| Treatment | Total | Women with Fulfilled Reproductive Desires (N = 51) | Women with Unfulfilled Reproductive Desires (N = 53) |
| Pregnancy Category ABCDX | Does It Make Pregnancy Impossible? | Recommended Washing Time to Get Pregnant (Weeks) | Fertility Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 59 (56.73%) | 28 (54.90%) | 31 (58.49%) | 0.136 | C | No. Safe in pregnancy | Safe in pregnancy | Not reported in women | |
| 36 (34.62%) | 16 (31.3%) | 20 (37.7%) | 0.49 | D | Yes. Teratogenic, risk of dental staining, poor bone growth. | 1 # | Unknown. Possible risk of contraceptive failure | |
| 33 (31.73%) | 13 (25.49) | 20 (37.74%) | 0.10 | B | No. Little or no increased risk of birth defects in women who inadvertently use during early pregnancy | 2 # | Reversible loss of fertility | |
| 21 (20.19%) | 5 (9.80%) | 16 (30.19%) | 0.013 * | |||||
| 12 (11.54%) | 8 (15.69%) | 4 (7.55%) | 0.231 | |||||
| 15 (14.42%) | 10 (19.61%) | 5 (9.43%) | 0.140 | B | No. Not contraindicated during pregnancy, no evidence | Safe in pregnancy | No effects on fertility or mating ability reported. | |
| 8 (7.69%) | 4 (7.84%) | 4 (7.55%) | 1.00 | D | No. Insufficient safety data | One day # | May not affect the reproductive performance and fertility | |
| 8 (7.69%) | 6 (11.76%) | 2 (3.77%) | 0.156 | B | No. Safety unclear | 24 | No fertility rate reported to date | |
| 6 (5.77%) | 4 (7.84%) | 2 (3.77%) | 0.432 | D | Yes. Ectopic pregnancy, pregnancy loss, septic abortion | 1 # | Reversible loss of fertility | |
| 5 (4.81%) | 2 (3.92%) | 3 (5.66%) | 0.679 | B | No. | One day | No effect | |
| 4 (3.85%) | 3 (5.88%) | 1 (1.89%) | 0.358 | D | No. May affect sex differentiation for the male during embryogenesis due to anti-androgenic properties | 1 # | May impair mating, fertility, and fecundity | |
| 4 (3.85%) | 3 (5.88%) | 1 (1.89%) | 0.358 | X | Yes. Embryotoxic and/or teratogenic | 144 | Reversible mild to moderate spermatogenic/Not fertility impairment reported in women | |
| 4 (3.85%) | 3 (5.88%) | 1 (1.89%) | 0.358 | C | No. Risk of teratogenicity is discussed. | One day # | Not established | |
| 3 (2.88%) | 2 (3.92%) | 1 (1.89%) | 0.614 | C | No. Insufficient data. May increase the risk for maternal postpartum hemorrhage and bleeding in the exposed infant when administered during the last few weeks of pregnancy | 1 # | Fertility not affected. Possible risk of contraceptive failure concomitant with combined oral contraceptives | |
| 2 (1.92%) | 0 (0.00%) | 2 (3.77%) | 0.495 | B | No | Safe in pregnancy | No effect | |
| 2 (1.92%) | 1 (1.96%) | 1 (1.89%) | 1.00 | D | No. Fetal harm can occur with first trimester use. Small risk of oral cleft | One day # | Not formally evaluated Menstrual irregularities. | |
| 1 (0.96%) | 1 (1.96%) | 0 (0.00%) | 0.49 | B | No. Safety unclear | 24 | Unknown |
# If no specified information was found, safety was considered after six half-lives, when 98% of a drug is eliminated from the body. Data are expressed as relative (absolute) frequencies. The chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate, were applied to compare categoric data. Two-tailed * p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant in all tests.
Demographic and clinical features of patients receiving first-line biologic treatment based on fulfillment of reproductive desires.
| Variable | Women with Fulfilled Reproductive Desires | Women with Unfulfilled Reproductive Desires |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 46.50 (SD 4.28) | 30.13 (SD 11.06) | 0.005 * |
|
| 0.084 | ||
|
| 1 | ||
|
| 34.39 (SD 5.72) | 33.11 (SD 6.68) | 0.71 |
|
| 3 (50.0%) | 3 (37.50%) | 0.64 |
|
| 1 (16.7%) | 3 (37.50%) | 0.804 |
|
| 4 (66.67%) | 4 (50.00%) | 0.627 |
|
| 26.83 (SD 9.41) | 15.50 (SD 5.73) | 0.016 * |
|
| 19.67 (SD 9.58) | 14.63 (SD 5.49) | 0.38 |
|
| 0.332 | ||
|
| 1.83 (SD 1.72) | 4.13 (SD 5.49) | 0.347 |
|
| 2.60 (1.75) | 2.00 (SD 1.77) | 0.497 |
|
| 13.83 (SD 6.88) | 14.38 (SD 11.51) | 0.921 |
|
| 3.33 (SD 1.86) | 3.13 (SD 1.13) | 0.799 |
|
| 4.50 (SD 2.74) | 4.25 (SD 1.28) | 0.822 |
|
| 1.00 (SD 0.89) | 2.75 (SD 2.25) | 0.099 |
AN: total abscess and inflammatory nodule count; BMI: body mass index; IHS4: International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System. Data are expressed as relative (absolute) frequencies and means (standard deviation (SD). The Student’s t test for independent samples was used to compare continuous variables, and the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate, were applied to compare categoric data. Two-tailed * p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant in all tests.