| Literature DB >> 33810189 |
Jingsi Chen1,2, Yi Chen3, Shaojie Liu2, Bo Chen2, Yingli Lu3, Ruihua Dong2.
Abstract
Thyroid nodules (TNs) are becoming increasingly prevalent. However, few studies have reported the effects of phthalates and lead (Pb) on TNs. In this study, we aimed to explore the associations of phthalates and Pb with the risks of TN. We sex-age-matched 220 TNs patients and 220 healthy controls from Zhejiang Shangyu, China. We measured 13 phthalate metabolites in spot urine samples. Blood lead levels (BLLs) were determined by atomic absorption spectrometry. The multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the associations between urinary phthalate metabolites and BLLs and the risks of TNs. We found BLLs were associated with increased risk of TNs in total population. Female-specific positive associations of mono-2-ethyl-5-carboxypentylphthalate (MECPP), mono-2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexylphthalate (MEHHP), mono-2-ethyl-5-oxohexylphthalate (MEOHP), mono-2-carboxymethyl-hexyl phthalate (MCMHP), and mono-isononyl phthalate (MiNP) with increased risk of TNs were also observed. Moreover, the positive association between phthalates and TNs was modified by BLLs. At the highest tertile of BLLs, monoethylphthalate (MEP), MECPP, MEHHP, MEOHP, and MiNP were significantly associated with increased risk of TNs. Our results indicated that certain phthalate metabolites and BLLs may contribute to increased risks of TNs.Entities:
Keywords: blood lead levels; case-control study; moderation effect; phthalates; thyroid nodules
Year: 2021 PMID: 33810189 PMCID: PMC8005157 DOI: 10.3390/toxics9030068
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxics ISSN: 2305-6304
Characteristics of thyroid nodule and corresponding health controls (n = 440).
| Characteristic | Cases ( | Controls ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex, n (%) | 1.000 | ||
| Male | 101 (45.9) | 101 (45.9) | |
| Female | 119 (54.1) | 119 (54.1) | |
| Age, median (IQR), years | 62 (54, 69) | 62 (53, 69) | 0.912 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 23.5 (21.5, 25.8) | 23.6 (21.0, 25.7) | 0.340 |
| Education, n (%) | |||
| ≤Primary school | 37 (16.8) | 39 (17.7) | 0.931 |
| High school or technical | 160 (72.7) | 172 (78.2) | |
| ≥College graduate | 23 (10.5) | 9 (4.1) | |
| Smoke, n (%) | 0.829 | ||
| Yes | 52 (23.6) | 50 (22.7) | |
| No | 142 (64.5) | 149 (67.7) | |
| Quit | 26 (11.8) | 21 (9.6) | |
| Alcohol consumpution, n (%) | 0.673 | ||
| Current drinker | 88 (40.0) | 92 (41.8) | |
| Non-drinker | 115 (52.3) | 112 (50.9) | |
| Former drinker | 17 (7.7) | 16 (7.3) | |
| Urinary iodine, median (IQR), μg/L | 141.3 (84.3, 205.2) | 148.8 (97.0, 199.8) | 0.462 |
IQR: interquartile range.
Urinary concentrations of phthalate metabolites (μg/g) and blood lead levels (μg/dL) in study population.
| Concentrations | Cases ( | Controls ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMP | 3.14 (1.38, 8.49) | 3.20 (1.64, 6.27) | 0.815 |
| MEP | 6.04 (2.4, 18.91) | 7.28 (2.76, 24.25) | 0.815 |
| MiBP | 9.58 (4.01, 23.94) | 10.21 (4.63, 23.53) | 0.815 |
| MnBP | 9.01 (2.3, 25.25) | 10.87 (1.66, 26.38) | 0.815 |
| MBzP | 0.40 (0.23, 0.89) | 0.44 (0.23, 0.69) | 0.815 |
| MEHP | 2.87 (0.98, 37.76) | 2.66 (1.00, 31.99) | 0.985 |
| MECPP | 7.3 (3.74, 15.33) | 6.39 (3.42, 11.22) | 0.815 |
| MEHHP | 7.59 (3.17, 19.85) | 6.56 (2.87, 13.48) | 0.495 |
| MEOHP | 3.76 (1.99, 9.25) | 3.46 (1.70, 6.32) | 0.787 |
| MCMHP | 0.67 (0.26, 3.7) | 0.65 (0.21, 1.93) | 0.787 |
| MCPP | 1.93 (1.18, 3.53) | 1.77 (1.12, 2.97) | 0.815 |
| MiNP | 8.13 (4.02, 18.8) | 7.49 (3.77, 13.87) | 0.815 |
| MCHP | 0.03 (0.02, 0.06) | 0.02 (0.01, 0.04) | 0.495 |
| BLLs | 4.00 (3.00, 5.30) | 3.60 (2.70, 4.88) | 0.322 |
p-adjusted values: p-values between control and thyroid nodule group, adjusted using false discovery rate.
Adjusted ORs for urinary phthalate metabolites, blood lead levels, and thyroid nodule.
| Metabolites | Total Population | |
|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) a | ||
| MMP | 0.96 (0.80, 1.15) | 0.663 |
| MEP | 0.95 (0.85, 1.06) | 0.324 |
| MiBP | 0.96 (0.87, 1.05) | 0.370 |
| MnBP | 0.98 (0.92, 1.03) | 0.412 |
| MBzP | 0.90 (0.72, 1.13) | 0.347 |
| MEHP | 0.97 (0.89, 1.04) | 0.387 |
| MECPP | 1.11 (0.92, 1.34) | 0.290 |
| MEHHP | 1.07 (0.95, 1.21) | 0.277 |
| MEOHP | 1.01 (0.88, 1.17) | 0.851 |
| MCMHP | 1.08 (0.96, 1.22) | 0.219 |
| MCPP | 0.96 (0.73, 1.26) | 0.766 |
| MiNP | 1.09 (0.92, 1.29) | 0.305 |
| MCHP | 1.16 (0.90, 1.50) | 0.251 |
| BLLs | 1.10 (1.01, 1.19) |
|
a The model was constructed with adjusting age, sex, BMI, smoking status, drink status, education level, and urinary iodine. Bold italic *: p < 0.05; ORs: odds ratios.
Adjusted ORs for urinary phthalate metabolites, blood lead levels, and thyroid nodule stratified by gender.
| Metabolites | Female | Male | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) a | OR (95% CI) | |||
| MMP | 1.17 (0.91, 1.50) | 0.235 | 0.77 (0.59, 1.01) | 0.061 |
| MEP | 1.10 (0.95, 1.27) | 0.218 | 0.79 (0.66, 0.93) |
|
| MiBP | 1.03 (0.90, 1.17) | 0.662 | 0.86 (0.74, 1.01) | 0.070 |
| MnBP | 1.03 (0.95, 1.11) | 0.497 | 0.93 (0.82, 1.04) | 0.083 |
| MBzP | 1.26 (0.89, 1.78) | 0.190 | 0.68 (0.50, 0.94) |
|
| MEHP | 0.96 (0.86, 1.07) | 0.470 | 0.97 (0.87, 1.09) | 0.623 |
| MECPP | 1.36 (1.02, 1.81) |
| 0.92 (0.70, 1.20) | 0.532 |
| MEHHP | 1.22 (1.02, 1.47) |
| 0.93 (0.77, 1.12) | 0.433 |
| MEOHP | 1.38 (1.07, 1.78) |
| 0.85 (0.71, 1.03) | 0.103 |
| MCMHP | 1.21 (1.02, 1.45) |
| 0.97 (0.81, 1.15) | 0.691 |
| MCPP | 1.01 (0.68, 1.49) | 0.957 | 0.92 (0.63, 1.33) | 0.647 |
| MiNP | 1.39 (1.04, 1.86) |
| 0.92 (0.73, 1.15) | 0.472 |
| MCHP | 1.34 (0.92, 1.96) | 0.126 | 1.03 (0.72, 1.45) | 0.888 |
| BLLs | 1.01 (1.00, 1.02) | 0.056 | 1.01 (1.00, 1.03) | 0.055 |
a The model was constructed with adjusting age, sex, BMI, smoking status, drink status, education level, and urinary iodine. Bold italic *: p < 0.05; ORs: odds ratios.
ORs for the association between urinary phthalate metabolites and thyroid nodule according to blood lead levels in female.
| Metabolites | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) a | OR (95% CI) | |||||
| MMP | 1 | 1.32 (0.97, 1.80) | 0.075 | 1.30 (0.86, 1.98) | 0.215 | 0.090 |
| MEP | 1 | 1.21 (0.95, 1.56) | 0.120 | 1.38 (1.08, 1.75) |
|
|
| MiBP | 1 | 1.12 (0.94, 1.33) | 0.216 | 1.16 (0.93, 1.44) | 0.184 | 0.224 |
| MnBP | 1 | 1.11 (0.98, 1.25) | 0.119 | 0.97 (0.84, 1.11) | 0.608 | 0.611 |
| MBzP | 1 | 0.89 (0.56, 1.41) | 0.617 | 0.82 (0.49, 1.37) | 0.444 | 0.950 |
| MEHP | 1 | 0.97 (0.82, 1.16) | 0.752 | 1.04 (0.87, 1.25) | 0.653 | 0.865 |
| MECPP | 1 | 1.38 (1.05, 1.81) |
| 1.44 (1.04, 2.00) |
|
|
| MEHHP | 1 | 1.33 (1.04, 1.70) |
| 1.21 (0.93, 1.56) | 0.152 |
|
| MEOHP | 1 | 1.36 (1.03, 1.80) |
| 1.46 (1.07, 2.00) |
|
|
| MCMHP | 1 | 1.18 (0.89, 1.57) | 0.255 | 1.18 (0.83, 1.66) | 0.357 | 0.065 |
| MCPP | 1 | 1.39 (0.79, 2.47) | 0.258 | 1.09 (0.57, 2.10) | 0.786 | 0.652 |
| MiNP | 1 | 1.33 (1.02, 1.73) |
| 1.51 (1.11, 2.06) |
|
|
| MCHP | 1 | 0.86 (0.71, 1.05) | 0.137 | 0.84 (0.67, 1.02) | 0.074 | 0.180 |
a The model was constructed with adjusting age, sex, BMI, smoking status, drink status, education level, and urinary iodine. Bold italic *: p < 0.05.