| Literature DB >> 33808768 |
Anna Masek1, Stefan Cichosz1, Małgorzata Piotrowska2.
Abstract
The study aimed to prepare sustainable and degradable elastic blends of epoxidized natural rubber (ENR) with poly(lactic acid) (PLA) that were reinforced with flax fiber (FF) and montmorillonite (MMT), simultaneously filling the gap in the literature regarding the PLA-containing polymer blends filled with natural additives. The performed study reveals that FF incorporation into ENR/PLA blend may cause a significant improvement in tensile strength from (10 ± 1) MPa for the reference material to (19 ± 2) MPa for the fibers-filled blend. Additionally, it was found that MMT employment in the role of the filler might contribute to ENR/PLA plasticization and considerably promote the blend elongation up to 600%. This proves the successful creation of the unique and eco-friendly PLA-containing polymer blend exhibiting high elasticity. Moreover, thanks to the performed accelerated thermo-oxidative and ultraviolet (UV) aging, it was established that MMT incorporation may delay the degradation of ENR/PLA blends under the abovementioned conditions. Additionally, mold tests revealed that plant-derived fiber addition might highly enhance the ENR/PLA blend's biodeterioration potential enabling faster and more efficient growth of microorganisms. Therefore, materials presented in this research may become competitive and eco-friendly alternatives to commonly utilized petro-based polymeric products.Entities:
Keywords: biodegradation; cellulose; poly(lactic acid), epoxidized natural rubber; polymer blend
Year: 2021 PMID: 33808768 PMCID: PMC8003495 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22063150
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Examples of possible interaction in epoxidized natural rubber/poly(lactic acid) (ENR/PLA) blends between the hydroxyl group of cellulose and oxirane ring of ENR or ester group of PLA.
Figure 2ENR/PLA blend properties before the accelerated aging processes: (a) analysis of the swelling experiment, (b) tensile strength of analyzed specimens, (c) elongation at break of investigated samples, (d) surface free energy, and its components analysis.
Tensile tension at an elongation of 100%, 200%, 300% for the unfilled and filled epoxidized natural rubber/poly(lactic acid) (ENR/PLA) blend samples.
| Sample | Tensile Tension [MPa] at Elongation of: | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 100% | 200% | 300% | |
| ENR/PLA | 4.5 ± 0.2 | 6.7 ± 0.3 | 8.8 ± 0.2 |
| ENR/PLA + CF | 5.9 ± 0.2 | 6.6 ± 0.4 | 7.7 ± 0.5 |
| ENR/PLA + FF | 16.2 ± 0.4 | ----- | ----- |
| ENR/PLA + FF + MMT | 5.0 ± 0.5 | 6.1 ± 0.2 | 6.6 ± 0.3 |
Water and diiodomethane contact angles for the unfilled and filled ENR/PLA blend samples.
| Sample | Contact Angle [°] | |
|---|---|---|
| Water | Diiodomethane | |
| ENR/PLA | 70 ± 3 | 57 ± 2 |
| ENR/PLA + CF | 71 ± 3 | 56 ± 2 |
| ENR/PLA + FF | 69 ± 1 | 55 ± 3 |
| ENR/PLA + FF + MMT | 97 ± 2 | 71 ± 2 |
Figure 3Investigation of the ENR/PLA blends’ properties before and after the accelerated aging processes: (a) mass loss during thermo-oxidative and UV aging, (b) color change during thermo-oxidative and UV aging, (c) tensile strength changes and (d) elongation at break variations during thermo-oxidative aging, (e) tensile strength changes and (f) elongation at break variations during the UV aging. * sample too brittle to be examined with the selected method; the measurement was impossible.
Additional parameters contributing to the color change in ENR/PLA blends and their variations during the thermo-oxidative and UV accelerated aging processes: whiteness index, chroma, hue angle. * sample too brittle to be examined with the selected method; the measurement was impossible.
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| ENR/PLA | 40 ± 4 | 37 ± 1 | * | * | * |
| ENR/PLA + CF | 41 ± 3 | 38 ± 5 | 39 ± 2 | 38 ± 3 | 38 ± 2 |
| ENR/PLA + FF | 41 ± 2 | 37 ± 3 | 36 ± 2 | 35 ± 4 | 39 ± 2 |
| ENR/PLA + FF + MMT | 46 ± 2 | 48 ± 2 | 41 ± 4 | 40 ± 1 | 40 ± 3 |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| ENR/PLA | 40 ± 4 | 42 ± 2 | * | * | * |
| ENR/PLA + CF | 41 ± 3 | 40 ± 3 | 42 ± 1 | 41 ± 2 | 48 ± 4 |
| ENR/PLA + FF | 41 ± 2 | 41 ± 2 | 42 ± 2 | 40 ± 2 | 42 ± 2 |
| ENR/PLA + FF + MMT | 46 ± 2 | 42 ± 3 | 41 ± 2 | 40 ± 3 | 45 ± 2 |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| ENR/PLA | 45 ± 2 | 50 ± 4 | * | * | * |
| ENR/PLA + CF | 44 ± 2 | 46 ± 2 | 44 ± 1 | 47 ± 2 | 48 ± 4 |
| ENR/PLA + FF | 47 ± 3 | 45 ± 3 | 45 ± 3 | 47 ± 2 | 46 ± 3 |
| ENR/PLA + FF + MMT | 43 ± 2 | 44 ± 1 | 47 ± 3 | 42 ± 2 | 46 ± 2 |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| ENR/PLA | 45 ± 2 | 46 ± 2 | * | * | * |
| ENR/PLA + CF | 44 ± 2 | 39 ± 3 | 43 ± 2 | 36 ± 2 | 36 ± 2 |
| ENR/PLA + FF | 47 ± 3 | 42 ± 2 | 43 ± 3 | 40 ± 1 | 41 ± 2 |
| ENR/PLA + FF + MMT | 43 ± 2 | 43 ± 3 | 43 ± 2 | 40 ± 3 | 40 ± 1 |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| ENR/PLA | 83 ± 4 | 76 ± 2 | * | * | * |
| ENR/PLA + CF | 75 ± 3 | 73 ± 4 | 73 ± 3 | 74 ± 4 | 73 ± 3 |
| ENR/PLA + FF | 81 ± 3 | 76 ± 3 | 75 ± 2 | 74 ± 2 | 77 ± 2 |
| ENR/PLA + FF + MMT | 82 ± 2 | 81 ± 2 | 77 ± 3 | 73 ± 3 | 74 ± 2 |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| ENR/PLA | 83 ± 4 | 78 ± 3 | * | * | * |
| ENR/PLA + CF | 75 ± 3 | 74 ± 3 | 75 ± 2 | 74 ± 3 | 71 ± 2 |
| ENR/PLA + FF | 81 ± 3 | 78 ± 3 | 79 ± 2 | 79 ± 1 | 79 ± 2 |
| ENR/PLA + FF + MMT | 82 ± 2 | 77 ± 2 | 75 ± 2 | 74 ± 3 | 77 ± 2 |
Aging coefficients attributed to the filled and unfilled ENR/PLA specimens at a certain aging time. * sample too brittle to be examined with the selected method; the measurement was impossible.
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
| |
| ENR/PLA | 0.14 ± 0.06 | * | * | * |
| ENR/PLA + CF | * | * | * | * |
| ENR/PLA + FF | 0.004 ± 0.002 | 0.002 ± 0.001 | 0.002 ± 0.001 | * |
| ENR/PLA + FF + MMT | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 0.20 ± 0,08 | 0.20 ± 0,07 |
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
| |
| ENR/PLA | 0.13 ± 0.05 | * | * | * |
| ENR/PLA + CF | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.03 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | * |
| ENR/PLA + FF | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.02 | 0.06 ± 0.02 | 0.01 ± 0.01 |
| ENR/PLA + FF + MMT | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.18 ± 0.07 | 0.15 ± 0.05 | 0.21 ± 0.08 |
The effect of molds on the unaged ENR/PLA blends; MGE—microorganism’s growth evaluation.
| Sample | Resistance to Moulds | Fungistatic Effect | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Method A | Method B | Method B’ | |||||
| MGE [-] | Picture | MGE [-] | Picture | MGE [-] | Picture | ||
| ENR/PLA | 2 |
| 4 |
| 3 |
| |
| ENR/PLA + CF | 3 |
| 5 |
| 5 |
| |
| ENR/PLA + FF | 5 |
| 4 |
| 3 |
| |
| ENR/PLA + FF + MMT | 5 |
| 4 |
| 3 |
| |
Composition of the polymer blend mixtures prepared for analysis in this research. Abbreviations: ENR—epoxidized natural rubber, PLA—poly(lactic acid), LA—lauric acid, DMI—1,2-dimethylimidazole, EH—elastin hydrolysate, CF—cellulose fibers, FF—flax fibers, MMT—montmorillonite, phr—per hundred rubber (it means: for one hundred parts by weight of rubber there are x parts by weight of the substance).
| Sample | Polymer Mixture Composition [phr] | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENR | PLA | LA | DMI | EH | CF | FF | MMT | |
| ENR/PLA | 100 | 75 | 3 | 0.6 | 0.6 | ---- | ---- | ---- |
| ENR/PLA + CF | 100 | 75 | 3 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 25 | ---- | ---- |
| ENR/PLA + FF | 100 | 75 | 3 | 0.6 | 0.6 | ---- | 25 | ---- |
| ENR/PLA + FF + MMT | 100 | 75 | 3 | 0.6 | 0.6 | ---- | 12.5 | 12.5 |