| Literature DB >> 33808245 |
Nicola Rosano1, Luigi Gallo2, Giuseppe Mercogliano3, Pasquale Quassone2, Ornella Picascia2, Marco Catalano1, Antonella Pesce1, Valeria Fiorini1, Ida Pelella1, Giuliana Vespere4, Marina Romano5, Pasquale Tammaro5, Ester Marra6, Gabriella Oliva7, Marina Lugarà7, Mario Scuderi8, Stefania Tamburrini1, Ines Marano1.
Abstract
Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a common condition requiring urgent attention that may involve surgical treatment. Imaging is essential for the diagnosis and characterization of SBO because the clinical presentation and results of laboratory tests may be nonspecific. Ultrasound is an excellent initial imaging modality for assisting physicians in the rapid and accurate diagnosis of a variety of pathologies to expedite management. In the case of SBO diagnosis, ultrasound has an overall sensitivity of 92% (95% CI: 89-95%) and specificity of 93% (95% CI: 85-97%); the aim of this review is to examine the criteria for the diagnosis of SBO by ultrasound, which can be divided into diagnostic and staging criteria. The diagnostic criteria include the presence of dilated loops and abnormal peristalsis, while the staging criteria are represented by parietal and valvulae conniventes alterations and by the presence of free extraluminal fluid. Ultrasound has reasonably high accuracy compared to computed tomography (CT) scanning and may substantially decrease the time to diagnosis; moreover, ultrasound is also widely used in the monitoring and follow-up of patients undergoing conservative treatment, allowing the assessment of loop distension and the resumption of peristalsis.Entities:
Keywords: bowel ultrasound; emergency ultrasound; small bowel obstruction
Year: 2021 PMID: 33808245 PMCID: PMC8065936 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11040617
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) ISSN: 2075-4418
Ultrasound criteria for small bowel obstruction (SBO) diagnosis.
| Simple | Decompensated | Complicated | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Increased | Increased | Increased |
|
| Normal | Normal or Increased | Increased |
|
| Not Thickened | Not Thickened | Thickened |
|
| Present and/or Hyperkinetic | Decreased | Absent |
|
| Absent | Present | Present |
Figure 1(a,b). A simple SBO. Ultrasound images show fluid-filled, dilated small bowel loops (a,b) with hyper-kinesis and hyper-representation of valvulae conniventes (white arrow) (a); tail comet artifacts are visible due to air-fluid levels (dashed arrow) (b) and groups of bowel loops with severe differences in diameter (‘bowel jump diameter’) are evident more superficially (*) (b). No free fluid was detected in the abdominal cavity or between bowel loops.
Figure 2A dilated small bowel loop with a caliber of more than 3 cm (dotted line) with trapped feces defines a ‘small bowel feces sign’. Bowel walls appear thin, and the folds flatten.
Figure 3A decompensated SBO, presenting fluid-filled, dilated small bowel loops with increased parietal thickening (*) (a) and free fluid between bowel loops (a). ‘Caliber jump’: a difference in caliber between the swollen loops upstream (white arrows) (a,b) and the collapsed loops downstream of the obstruction (black arrows) (a,b).
Ultrasound signs of SBO.
|
| |
|---|---|
| Loop Dilation | >2.5 cm |
| Kinesis Alterations | Altered |
|
| |
| Free Fluid | |
| Parietal Alterations | Parietal and Valvulae Conniventes Thickening |
| Ancillary Signs (Increased Diagnostic Confidence) | ‘Caliber Jump’ |
Figure 4A complicated SBO in a 69-year-old male with gastric cancer and peritoneal carcinosis. Ultrasound images show long (a) and axial (b) evaluations of a fluid-filled, dilated small bowel loop with hyperechogenic floating material (shown with an asterisk) (b,d). Bowel peristalsis was absent. Mild parietal and valvulae conniventes thickening are present (c,d). Downstream loops present normal caliber (bowel jump diameter). Free fluid is interposed between bowel loops (black arrow) (b).
Figure 5A complicated SBO presenting fluid-filled bowel loops with thickened walls with a stratified echo pattern (a) and thickened valvulae conniventes (b). Free fluid in the abdominal cavity was detected (b). Tail comet artifacts for air-fluid levels are visible (a). At the time of surgery, the bowel loop was necrotic.