Literature DB >> 33808134

Comparative Toxicity of Fly Ash: An In Vitro Study.

Elvira Rozhina1, Ilnur Ishmukhametov1, Läysän Nigamatzyanova1, Farida Akhatova1, Svetlana Batasheva1, Sergey Taskaev2, Carlos Montes3, Yuri Lvov3, Rawil Fakhrullin1.   

Abstract

Fly ash produced during coal combustion is one of the major sources of air and water pollution, but the data on the impact of micrometer-size fly ash particles on human cells is still incomplete. Fly ash samples were collected from several electric power stations in the United States (Rockdale, TX; Dolet Hill, Mansfield, LA; Rockport, IN; Muskogee, OK) and from a metallurgic plant located in the Russian Federation (Chelyabinsk Electro-Metallurgical Works OJSC). The particles were characterized using dynamic light scattering, atomic force, and hyperspectral microscopy. According to chemical composition, the fly ash studied was ferro-alumino-silicate mineral containing substantial quantities of Ca, Mg, and a negligible concentration of K, Na, Mn, and Sr. The toxicity of the fly ash microparticles was assessed in vitro using HeLa cells (human cervical cancer cells) and Jurkat cells (immortalized human T lymphocytes). Incubation of cells with different concentrations of fly ash resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in cell viability for all fly ash variants. The most prominent cytotoxic effect in HeLa cells was produced by the ash particles from Rockdale, while the least was produced by the fly ash from Chelyabinsk. In Jurkat cells, the lowest toxicity was observed for fly ash collected from Rockport, Dolet Hill and Muscogee plants. The fly ash from Rockdale and Chelyabinsk induced DNA damage in HeLa cells, as revealed by the single cell electrophoresis, and disrupted the normal nuclear morphology. The interaction of fly ash microparticles of different origins with cells was visualized using dark-field microscopy and hyperspectral imaging. The size of ash particles appeared to be an important determinant of their toxicity, and the smallest fly ash particles from Chelyabinsk turned out to be the most cytotoxic to Jukart cells and the most genotoxic to HeLa cells.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA comet assay; airborne microparticles; cell viability; fly ash toxicity; hyperspectral microscopy

Year:  2021        PMID: 33808134      PMCID: PMC8038091          DOI: 10.3390/molecules26071926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Molecules        ISSN: 1420-3049            Impact factor:   4.411


  38 in total

1.  Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity induced by coal and coal fly ash particles samples in V79 cells.

Authors:  Grethel León-Mejía; Luis F O Silva; Matheus S Civeira; Marcos L S Oliveira; Miriana Machado; Izabel Vianna Villela; Andreas Hartmann; Suziane Premoli; Dione Silva Corrêa; Juliana Da Silva; João Antônio Pêgas Henriques
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  A novel approach to evaluate the lung cancer risk of airborne particles emitted in a city.

Authors:  L Stabile; A Massimo; V Rizza; M D'Apuzzo; A Evangelisti; M Scungio; A Frattolillo; G Cortellessa; G Buonanno
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 3.  Combustion aerosols: factors governing their size and composition and implications to human health.

Authors:  J S Lighty; J M Veranth; A F Sarofim
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.235

4.  Cytotoxicity of size-density fractionated coal fly ash in rat alveolar macrophages cultured in vitro.

Authors:  T Kondo; S Takahashi; H Sato; M Yamada; T Kikuchi; K Furuya
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  Anti-oxidative and inflammatory responses induced by fly ash particles and carbon black in lung epithelial cells.

Authors:  Silvia Diabaté; Britta Bergfeldt; Diana Plaumann; Caroline Ubel; Carsten Weiss
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 4.142

6.  Mutagenicity and genotoxicity of coal fly ash water leachate.

Authors:  Rajarshi Chakraborty; Anita Mukherjee
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 6.291

7.  Characterization of coal fly ash nanoparticles and induced oxidative DNA damage in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

Authors:  Sourabh Dwivedi; Quaiser Saquib; Abdulaziz A Al-Khedhairy; Al-Yousef Sulaiman Ali; Javed Musarrat
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Differential pulmonary inflammation and in vitro cytotoxicity of size-fractionated fly ash particles from pulverized coal combustion.

Authors:  M Ian Gilmour; Silvia O'Connor; Colin A J Dick; C Andrew Miller; William P Linak
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.235

9.  Ultrafine particulate pollutants induce oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage.

Authors:  Ning Li; Constantinos Sioutas; Arthur Cho; Debra Schmitz; Chandan Misra; Joan Sempf; Meiying Wang; Terry Oberley; John Froines; Andre Nel
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Facile Fabrication of Natural Polyelectrolyte-Nanoclay Composites: Halloysite Nanotubes, Nucleotides and DNA Study.

Authors:  Svetlana Batasheva; Marina Kryuchkova; Ramil Fakhrullin; Giuseppe Cavallaro; Giuseppe Lazzara; Farida Akhatova; Läysän Nigamatzyanova; Vladimir Evtugyn; Elvira Rozhina; Rawil Fakhrullin
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 4.411

View more
  3 in total

1.  Influence of Wood Fly Ash on Concrete Properties through Filling Effect Mechanism.

Authors:  Ivan Gabrijel; Marija Jelčić Rukavina; Nina Štirmer
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.623

2.  Novel Foaming-Agent Free Insulating Geopolymer Based on Industrial Fly Ash and Rice Husk.

Authors:  Samar Beaino; Peter El Hage; Rodolphe Sonnier; Sylvain Seif; Roland El Hage
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 4.411

3.  Oxidative damage and DNA repair in desiccated recalcitrant embryonic axes of Acer pseudoplatanus L.

Authors:  Beata P Plitta-Michalak; Alice A Ramos; Piotr Pupel; Marcin Michalak
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.215

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.