Literature DB >> 33807934

Assessing Commensality in Research.

Henrik Scander1, Agneta Yngve2,3, Maria Lennernäs Wiklund4.   

Abstract

This scoping review focuses on the assessment of commensality in research and attempts to identify used methods for performing research on commensality. It reflects a multidisciplinary research field and draws on findings from Web of Science Core Collection, up to April 2019. The empirical material consisted of 61 studies, whereof most were qualitative research, and some were of quantitative character, including very few dietary surveys. The findings show nine papers categorized as using quantitative approaches, 52 papers were categorized as qualitative. The results show a wide variety of different ways to try to find and understand how commensality can be understood and identified. There seems to be a shift in the very concept of commensality as well as some variations around the concept. This paper argues the need to further investigate the importance of commensality for health and wellbeing, as well as the need to gather data on health and health-related behaviors, living conditions and sociodemographic data in parallel. The review shows the broad-ranging areas where commensality is researched, from cultural and historical areas to ethnographic or anthropological areas over to dietary assessment. To complement large dietary surveys with methods of assessing who you are eating with in what environment should be a simple way to further our knowledge on the circumstances of meal intake and the importance of commensality. To add 24-h dietary recall to any study of commensality is another way of identifying the importance of commensality for dietary quality. The use of mixed methods research was encouraged by several authors as a good way forward in the assessment of commensality and its importance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conviviality; dining; eating practice; eating together; food studies; gastronomy; meal; multidisciplinary

Year:  2021        PMID: 33807934      PMCID: PMC7967394          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18052632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  36 in total

1.  How French subjects describe well-being from food and eating habits? Development, item reduction and scoring definition of the Well-Being related to Food Questionnaire (Well-BFQ©).

Authors:  I Guillemin; A Marrel; B Arnould; L Capuron; A Dupuy; E Ginon; S Layé; J-M Lecerf; M Prost; M Rogeaux; I Urdapilleta; F-A Allaert
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.868

2.  Impossible meals? The food and meal situation of flight attendants in Scandinavia - A qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Maria Nyberg; Maria Lennernäs Wiklund
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 3.868

3.  Eating together and eating alone: meal arrangements in British households.

Authors:  Luke Yates; Alan Warde
Journal:  Br J Sociol       Date:  2016-11-18

4.  The changing meaning of eating out in three English cities 1995-2015.

Authors:  Jessica Paddock; Alan Warde; Jennifer Whillans
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.868

5.  Toward new forms of meal sharing? Collective habits and personal diets.

Authors:  Estelle Masson; Sandrine Bubendorff; Christèle Fraïssé
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.868

6.  Food, eating and taste: parents' perspectives on the making of the middle class teenager.

Authors:  Kathryn C Backett-Milburn; Wendy J Wills; Mei-Li Roberts; Julia Lawton
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  The frequency of family meals and nutritional health in children: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Dallacker; R Hertwig; J Mata
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 9.213

8.  Broad Themes of Difference between French and Americans in Attitudes to Food and Other Life Domains: Personal Versus Communal Values, Quantity Versus Quality, and Comforts Versus Joys.

Authors:  Paul Rozin; Abigail K Remick; Claude Fischler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-07-26

9.  Perceptions and practices of commensality and solo-eating among Korean and Japanese university students: A cross-cultural analysis.

Authors:  Wookyoun Cho; Wakako Takeda; Yujin Oh; Naomi Aiba; Youngmee Lee
Journal:  Nutr Res Pract       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 1.926

10.  Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.

Authors:  Zachary Munn; Micah D J Peters; Cindy Stern; Catalin Tufanaru; Alexa McArthur; Edoardo Aromataris
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  3 in total

1.  Children's experiences of meals after obesity treatment: a qualitative follow-up four years after a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Nicklas Neuman; Anna Jörnvi; Anna Ek; Karin Nordin; Karin Eli; Paulina Nowicka
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.567

Review 2.  What Is Commensality? A Critical Discussion of an Expanding Research Field.

Authors:  Håkan Jönsson; Maxime Michaud; Nicklas Neuman
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on the perception of home meals and meal-related variables: A large-scale study within the Italian population during the acute phase of the pandemic.

Authors:  Maria Piochi; Federica Buonocore; Francesco Spampani; Luisa Torri
Journal:  Food Qual Prefer       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 5.565

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.