Sofia Bastoni1, Christian Wrede1, Achraf Ammar2,3, Annemarie Braakman-Jansen1, Robbert Sanderman1,4, Andrea Gaggioli5,6, Khaled Trabelsi7,8, Liwa Masmoudi7, Omar Boukhris7, Jordan M Glenn9, Bassem Bouaziz10, Hamdi Chtourou7,11, Lisette van Gemert-Pijnen1. 1. Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands. 2. Institute of Sport Science, Otto-von-Guericke University, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany. 3. Interdisciplinary Laboratory in Neurosciences, Physiology and Psychology: Physical Activity, Health and Learning (LINP2), UFR STAPS, UPL, Paris Nanterre University, 92000 Nanterre, France. 4. Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, 9712 Groningen, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Psychology, Universitá Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 20123 Milan, Italy. 6. Applied Technology for Neuro-Psychology Lab, I.r.c.c.s. Istituto Auxologico Italiano, 20149 Milan, Italy. 7. High Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Sfax, University of Sfax, 3000 Sfax, Tunisia. 8. Research Laboratory: Education, Motricité, Sport et Santé, EM2S, LR19JS01, High Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Sfax, University of Sfax, 3000 Sfax, Tunisia. 9. Exercise Science Research Center, Department of Health, Human Performance and Recreation, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, NC AR72701, USA. 10. Multimedia Information Systems and Advanced Computing Laboratory (MIRACL), University of Sfax, 3021 Sfax, Tunisia. 11. Activité Physique, Sport et Santé, UR18JS01, Observatoire National du Sport, 1003 Tunis, Tunisia.
Abstract
(1) Background: The COVID-19 pandemic forced people from all around the globe to strongly modify their daily routines, putting a significant strain on the social aspects of daily lives. While the first wave of the pandemic was a very challenging time in all countries, it is still uncertain whether various lockdown intensities and infection rates differed regarding their psychosocial impact. This work therefore aimed to investigate (i) the psychosocial effects of home confinement in two European countries that underwent different lockdown intensities: Italy and the Netherlands and (ii) the role of communication technology in relation to feelings of loneliness. (2) Methods: A cross-sectional online survey inquiring about different psychosocial variables and the use of and satisfaction towards communication technology was circulated among the general public during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. In total, 629 participants (66% female, 68% from the Netherlands) answered each question twice, referring to "before" and "during" the pandemic. (3) Results: We found significant negative effects of COVID-19 home confinement on depressive feelings (p < 0.001, %∆ = +54%), loneliness (p < 0.001, %∆ = +37.3%), life satisfaction (p < 0.001, %∆ = -19.8%) and mental wellbeing (p < 0.001, %∆ = -10.6%) which were accompanied with a significantly increased need for psychosocial support (p < 0.001, %∆ = +17.3%). However, the magnitude of psychosocial impact did not significantly differ between residents undergoing a more intense (Italy) versus a less intense (Netherlands) lockdown, although the decrease in social participation was found to be significantly different for both countries (z = -7.714, p < 0.001). Furthermore, our findings demonstrate that the increase in loneliness was associated with the adoption of new digital communication tools (r = 0.21, p < 0.001), and significantly higher for individuals who started to adopt at least one new digital communication tool during confinement than for those who did not (z = -4.252, p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: This study highlights that, although COVID-19 home confinement significantly impacted psychosocial wellbeing during the first wave of the pandemic, this impact did not differ based on lockdown intensity. Recognizing the increasing adoption of digital communication technology in an attempt to reduce lockdown loneliness, future studies should investigate what is needed from the technology to achieve this effect.
(1) Background: The COVID-19 pandemic forced people from all around the globe to strongly modify their daily routines, putting a significant strain on the social aspects of daily lives. While the first wave of the pandemic was a very challenging time in all countries, it is still uncertain whether various lockdown intensities and infection rates differed regarding their psychosocial impact. This work therefore aimed to investigate (i) the psychosocial effects of home confinement in two European countries that underwent different lockdown intensities: Italy and the Netherlands and (ii) the role of communication technology in relation to feelings of loneliness. (2) Methods: A cross-sectional online survey inquiring about different psychosocial variables and the use of and satisfaction towards communication technology was circulated among the general public during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. In total, 629 participants (66% female, 68% from the Netherlands) answered each question twice, referring to "before" and "during" the pandemic. (3) Results: We found significant negative effects of COVID-19 home confinement on depressive feelings (p < 0.001, %∆ = +54%), loneliness (p < 0.001, %∆ = +37.3%), life satisfaction (p < 0.001, %∆ = -19.8%) and mental wellbeing (p < 0.001, %∆ = -10.6%) which were accompanied with a significantly increased need for psychosocial support (p < 0.001, %∆ = +17.3%). However, the magnitude of psychosocial impact did not significantly differ between residents undergoing a more intense (Italy) versus a less intense (Netherlands) lockdown, although the decrease in social participation was found to be significantly different for both countries (z = -7.714, p < 0.001). Furthermore, our findings demonstrate that the increase in loneliness was associated with the adoption of new digital communication tools (r = 0.21, p < 0.001), and significantly higher for individuals who started to adopt at least one new digital communication tool during confinement than for those who did not (z = -4.252, p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: This study highlights that, although COVID-19 home confinement significantly impacted psychosocial wellbeing during the first wave of the pandemic, this impact did not differ based on lockdown intensity. Recognizing the increasing adoption of digital communication technology in an attempt to reduce lockdown loneliness, future studies should investigate what is needed from the technology to achieve this effect.
Entities:
Keywords:
COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; communication technology; home confinement; loneliness; mental wellbeing; public health
Authors: Georgina Parker; David Lie; Dan J Siskind; Melinda Martin-Khan; Beverly Raphael; David Crompton; Steve Kisely Journal: Int Psychogeriatr Date: 2015-07-27 Impact factor: 3.878
Authors: Linda Ng Fat; Shaun Scholes; Sadie Boniface; Jennifer Mindell; Sarah Stewart-Brown Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2016-11-16 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Jonathan Henssler; Friederike Stock; Joris van Bohemen; Henrik Walter; Andreas Heinz; Lasse Brandt Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2020-10-06 Impact factor: 5.270
Authors: Achraf Ammar; Hamdi Chtourou; Omar Boukhris; Khaled Trabelsi; Liwa Masmoudi; Michael Brach; Bassem Bouaziz; Ellen Bentlage; Daniella How; Mona Ahmed; Patrick Mueller; Notger Mueller; Hsen Hsouna; Asma Aloui; Omar Hammouda; Laisa Liane Paineiras-Domingos; Annemarie Braakman-Jansen; Christian Wrede; Sophia Bastoni; Carlos Soares Pernambuco; Leonardo Mataruna; Morteza Taheri; Khadijeh Irandoust; Aïmen Khacharem; Nicola L Bragazzi; Jana Strahler; Jad Adrian Washif; Albina Andreeva; Samira C Khoshnami; Evangelia Samara; Vasiliki Zisi; Parasanth Sankar; Waseem N Ahmed; Mohamed Romdhani; Jan Delhey; Stephen J Bailey; Nicholas T Bott; Faiez Gargouri; Lotfi Chaari; Hadj Batatia; Gamal Mohamed Ali; Osama Abdelkarim; Mohamed Jarraya; Kais El Abed; Nizar Souissi; Lisette Van Gemert-Pijnen; Bryan L Riemann; Laurel Riemann; Wassim Moalla; Jonathan Gómez-Raja; Monique Epstein; Robbert Sanderman; Sebastian Schulz; Achim Jerg; Ramzi Al-Horani; Taiysir Mansi; Mohamed Jmail; Fernando Barbosa; Fernando Ferreira-Santos; Boštjan Šimunič; Rado Pišot; Saša Pišot; Andrea Gaggioli; Piotr Zmijewski; Christian Apfelbacher; Jürgen Steinacker; Helmi Ben Saad; Jordan M Glenn; Karim Chamari; Tarak Driss; Anita Hoekelmann Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-08-27 Impact factor: 3.390