Literature DB >> 33807718

Effect of the Pellet and Mash Feed Forms on the Productive Performance, Egg Quality, Nutrient Metabolism, and Intestinal Morphology of Two Laying Hen Breeds.

Yi Wan1, Ruiyu Ma1, Anam Khalid2, Lilong Chai3, Renrong Qi1, Wei Liu1, Junying Li1, Yan Li1, Kai Zhan1.   

Abstract

One of the most important factors that determine feed utilization by chickens is the feed form. Although it is generally believed that pellet diets have a positive effect on chicken growth, there are some studies that have indicated no difference between pellet and mash on chickens performance. This study was conducted to assess the effects of feed form on production performance, egg quality, nutrient metabolism and intestinal morphology in two breed laying hens. Two hundred and sixteen 25-week-old Hy-Line brown (n = 108) and Hy-Line grey (n = 108) hens were selected. Each breed was randomly allocated into two treatments with 6 replications (9 birds in each replication), which were fed mash and pellet diets, respectively. Production performances were recorded daily and egg quality traits were measured every two weeks. At 42 weeks of age, one bird per replication from each experimental group was selected for metabolism determination and intestine morphology observation. Compared with mash diets, pellet diets improved laying rate (p < 0.05), ADFI (average daily feed intake, p < 0.05), egg weight, shell strength, yolk proportion and Haugh unit (p < 0.05) in both breeds and reduced the FCR (feed conversion ratio, p < 0.05) in Hy-Line grey. The apparent digestibility of DM% (dry matter) and CP% (crude protein) were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in both breed laying hens fed pellet than those fed mash. The apparent digestibility of P% (phosphorus) and Ca% (calcium) was higher in Hy-Line grey fed pellet and was higher in Hy-Line brown fed mash. Compared to mash diets, pellet diets increased the VH (villus height), CD (crypt depth) and VCR (ratio of villus height to crypt depth) of the small intestine of Hy-Line grey, and increased the VH and CD of duodenum and ileum of Hy-Line brown. Overall, pellet diets improved production performance and nutrition metabolism through positive changes in the laying rate, feed intake, egg albumen quality and apparent digestibility of laying hens. The current findings provided support for the advantages of feeding pellets during the peak egg laying period for the two popular laying hen strains, Hy-Line brown and Hy-Line grey.

Entities:  

Keywords:  feed form; intestinal morphology; laying hen; nutrient metabolism; production performance

Year:  2021        PMID: 33807718      PMCID: PMC7998960          DOI: 10.3390/ani11030701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animals (Basel)        ISSN: 2076-2615            Impact factor:   2.752


  12 in total

1.  Effect of feeding whole cereals on performance, starch digestibility and duodenal particle size distribution in broiler chickens.

Authors:  H Hetland; B Svihus; V Olaisen
Journal:  Br Poult Sci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.095

2.  Responses of male growing broilers to increasing levels of balanced protein offered as coarse mash or pellets of varying quality.

Authors:  A Lemme; P J A Wijtten; J van Wichen; A Petri; D J Langhout
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Influence of feed particle size and feed form on the performance, energy utilization, digestive tract development, and digesta parameters of broiler starters.

Authors:  A M Amerah; V Ravindran; R G Lentle; D G Thomas
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Productive performance of brown-egg laying pullets from hatching to 5 weeks of age as affected by fiber inclusion, feed form, and energy concentration of the diet.

Authors:  P Guzmán; B Saldaña; H A Mandalawi; A Pérez-Bonilla; R Lázaro; G G Mateos
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Influence of feed particle size and feed form on productive performance, egg quality, gastrointestinal tract traits, digestive enzymes, intestinal morphology, and nutrient digestibility of laying hens reared in enriched cages.

Authors:  G Ege; M Bozkurt; B Koçer; A E Tüzün; M Uygun; G Alkan
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Effects of feed form and particle size, and pellet binder on performance, digestive tract parameters, intestinal morphology, and cecal microflora populations in broilers.

Authors:  Mohammad Hossein Mohammadi Ghasem Abadi; Hossein Moravej; Mahmoud Shivazad; Mohammad Amir Karimi Torshizi; Woo Kyun Kim
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Supplementation of glutamine and vitamin E on the morphometry of the intestinal mucosa in broiler chickens.

Authors:  A E Murakami; M I Sakamoto; M R M Natali; L M G Souza; J R G Franco
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Influence of particle size of the main cereal of the diet on egg production, gastrointestinal tract traits, and body measurements of brown laying hens1.

Authors:  J Herrera; B Saldaña; P Guzmán; L Cámara; G G Mateos
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Effects of feed form and energy levels on growth performance, carcass yield and nutrient digestibility in broilers.

Authors:  A Massuquetto; J C Panisson; V G Schramm; D Surek; E L Krabbe; A Maiorka
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effects of main cereal type and feed form on production performance, egg quality and egg sanitary indices of laying hens.

Authors:  Y W Zheng; L H Zhao; Y M Wei; Q G Ma; C Ji; J Y Zhang
Journal:  Br Poult Sci       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 2.095

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effects of Dietary Rapeseed Meal on Growth Performance, Carcass Traits, Serum Parameters, and Intestinal Development of Geese.

Authors:  Zhenming Fu; Guoqiang Su; Haiming Yang; Qingyu Sun; Tao Zhong; Zhiyue Wang
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.752

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.