| Literature DB >> 33807648 |
Silvia Catanese1, Giacomo Aringhieri2,3, Caterina Vivaldi1,2, Francesca Salani1, Saverio Vitali3, Irene Pecora4, Valentina Massa1, Monica Lencioni1, Enrico Vasile1, Rachele Tintori2, Francesco Balducci2, Alfredo Falcone1,2, Carla Cappelli3, Lorenzo Fornaro1.
Abstract
Sarcopenia is recognised as a predictor of toxicity and survival in localised and locally advanced gastric cancer (GC). Its prognostication power in advanced unresectable or metastatic GC (aGC) is debated. The survival impact of visceral and subcutaneous fat distribution (visceral fat area (VFA)/subcutaneous fat area (SFA)) is ambiguous. Our aim was to determine the influence of body composition parameters (BCp) on toxicity and survival in aGC patients undergoing palliative treatment. BCp were retrospectively assessed by baseline computed tomography for 78 aGC patients who received first-line chemotherapy from March 2010 to January 2017. Correlations between BCp and toxicity and survival were calculated by χ2-test and by log-rank-test and Cox-model, respectively. Sarcopenia fails to show association with progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.44) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.88). However, sarcopenia influences the development of high-grade neutropenia (p = 0.048) and mucositis (p = 0.054). VFA/SFA (high vs. all the rest) results as a strong predictor of objective response (p = 0.02) and outcome (PFS, p = 0.001; OS, p = 0.02). At multivariate analysis for PFS, prognostic factors are VFA/SFA (p = 0.03) and a neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio >3. The same factors remain significant for OS (each p = 0.03) along with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (p = 0.008) and number of metastatic sites ≥2 (p < 0.001). In our cohort of aGC, VFA/SFA exhibit a robust impact on survival, with a higher sensitivity than sarcopenia.Entities:
Keywords: body composition; gastric cancer; metastatic; outcome; sarcopenia; subcutaneous fat area; toxicity; visceral fat area
Year: 2021 PMID: 33807648 PMCID: PMC7961444 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10051079
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241