| Literature DB >> 33807185 |
Massimo Rippa1, Riccardo Castagna1, Domenico Sagnelli1, Ambra Vestri1, Giorgia Borriello2, Giovanna Fusco1,2, Jun Zhou3, Lucia Petti1.
Abstract
Brucella is a foodborne pathogen globally affecting both the economy and healthcare. Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) nano-biosensing can be a promising strategy for its detection. We combined high-performance quasi-crystal patterned nanocavities for Raman enhancement with the use of covalently immobilized Tbilisi bacteriophages as high-performing bio-receptors. We coupled our efficient SERS nano-biosensor to a Raman system to develop an on-field phage-based bio-sensing platform capable of monitoring the target bacteria. The developed biosensor allowed us to identify Brucella abortus in milk by our portable SERS device. Upon bacterial capture from samples (104 cells), a signal related to the pathogen recognition was observed, proving the concrete applicability of our system for on-site and in-food detection.Entities:
Keywords: SERS; bacteria; nano-biosensing; nanocavities; quasi-crystals
Year: 2021 PMID: 33807185 PMCID: PMC8067257 DOI: 10.3390/nano11040886
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Home-made portable system for Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) analysis in situ: (a) Picture of the system, (b) schematic representation.
Figure 2Schematic representation of the patterned NCs and the Au-surface functionalization.
Figure 3Morphological characterization of the nanostructures by SEM. Detailed image of the structure showing a cell of Brucella abortus is highlighted in red. Structure measures are distance of a = 50 nm, and side size of d = 185 nm with increasing edge-to-edge distances from 25 to 100 nm.
Figure 4Comparison of SERS measurements performed on our functionalized nanostructures after binding in ddH2O. (a) Registered SERS spectra of the 4-ATP SAM (green line), the diazonium (4-ATP–N≡N+) (blue curve), the covalently immobilized phage (black curve), and the captured Brucella (red curve). (b) Magnification of the SERS spectra referenced to the zero level for the covalently immobilized phage (black curve) and the captured Brucella (red curve).
Vibrational assignment of Raman and SERS spectra.
| Vibrational Assignment | 4-ATP Raman (cm−1) | 4-ATP SERS (cm−1) | Tb Phage (cm−1) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SC str + NH2 rock | 1086 s | 1076 | 1075 s | 1.1 | 3.9 |
| CH bend | 1174 w | 1177 | 1177 m | 1.1 | 3.8 |
| CN bend | 1206 vw | - | - | - | - |
| CH str | 1288 w | 1308 | - | - | - |
| NN str | - | - | 1322 s | 1.3 | 4 |
| CC str + CH + rock + NH2rock | - | 1391 | 1388 w | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| CC str + NH2 rock | - | 1440 | 1436 m | 1.5 | 0.8 |
| CC str + CH bend | 1491 w | 1478 | - | - | - |
| CC str + NH2 bend | 1590 s | 1581 | 1574 s | 1.3 | 4.3 |
| SH str | 2555 | - | - | - | - |
1 The areas of the fitted peaks were used to calculate the enhancement of the signal as compared to the negative control (phage signal without the bacteria).
Figure 5Comparison of SERS measurements performed on our functionalized nanostructures after binding in milk. (a) Registered SERS spectra of the covalently immobilized phage (black curve) and the captured Brucella. (b) Magnification of 40-min incubation of the Tb-sensor with milk free of pathogens (black line, Figure 5). Micro-filtrated milk was then inoculated with the live bacteria. The spiked sample (300 µL, total bacterial count of 3 × 104 CFU) was dispersed onto the biosensor surface and incubated for 40 min. The 1322 cm−1 peak recorded for the contaminated sample (red line, Figure 5b) had a 4-fold larger area than the reference peak of the negative control spectrum (black line, Figure 5b and Table 1). These results proved the outstanding performances of our biosensor in real conditions, i.e., with a viable form of the pathogen and a complex food matrix. Interesting to note, the signal amplification achieved for B. abortus detection in milk was even higher than in distilled water at equal bacterial count. A plausible reason for this discrepancy could lie in the pH/ionic strength values of the two environments that differently influenced the phage binding.