| Literature DB >> 33807140 |
Patricio Ramos-Padilla1, Verónica Dayana Villavicencio-Barriga1,2, Haydeé Cárdenas-Quintana3, Leonardo Abril-Merizalde4, Angélica Solís-Manzano5, Tannia Valeria Carpio-Arias1.
Abstract
Confinement due to COVID-19 has brought important changes in people's lives as well as in their eating and resting habits. In this study we aimed at exploring the eating habits and sleep quality of the adult population of Ecuador during the mandatory confinement due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This is a cross-sectional study, which used an online survey that included questions about eating habits and sleeping habits in adults (n = 9522) between 18-69 years old. The Pittsburg sleep quality questionnaire validated for the Hispanic population was used, and questions about dietary habits. The statistical test Chi-square statistical test was used to analyze the data. The results show that sleep quality differs according to sex, being worse in women, both in all components of sleep quality and in the total score (p < 0.001). Women had greater changes in the habitual consumption of food compared to men (24.24% vs. 22.53%), and people between 18 and 40 years of age decreased their food consumption in relation to people >40 years (24.06% vs. 17.73%). Our results indicate that mandatory confinement due to the COVID-19 pandemic in Ecuador has generated changes in the eating habits and sleep quality in the adult population sampled, and these changes are more noticeable in women and young adults. These changes offer an important alert for the health system and further, advice for the implementation of future public health policies.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; diet; eating habits; sleep quality
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33807140 PMCID: PMC8037487 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18073606
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Demographic characteristics studied. Adult population, both sexes.
| Characteristics | Frequency | Percentage | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Woman | 6610 | 69.4 | ||
| Man | 2912 | 30.6 | |||
| Residence area | Rural | 2674 | 28.1 | ||
| Urban | 6848 | 71.9 | |||
| Occupation | Housewife-student-retiree | 8156 | 85.7 | ||
| Teacher-researcher | 426 | 4.5 | |||
| Employee-entrepreneur-business owner | 940 | 9.9 | |||
| Marital status | Married-common law marriage | 2227 | 23.4 | ||
| Separated-divorced-widowed | 303 | 3.2 | |||
| Single | 6992 | 73.4 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Age | 18 | 69 | 24.91 | 7.647 | 1.802 |
| Inhabitants at home | 1 | 12 | 4.71 | 1.849 | 1.049 |
SD = Standard Deviation.
Acquisition of food during mandatory confinement because of the COVID-19 pandemic.
| Frequency | Percentage | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Way acquisition of food | Home delivery | 358 | 3.8 |
| Local market or store | 5334 | 56.0 | |
| Supermarkets | 1418 | 14.9 | |
| All of the above | 2412 | 25.3 | |
| Total | 9522 | 100.0 | |
Eating habits, nutritional supplements and beverages intake; total population.
| N = 9522 | Frequency | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Changed usual mealtimes | No | 4722 | 49.6 |
| Yes | 4800 | 50.4 | |
| Stopped consumption of any food because it was considered harmful | No | 7994 | 84.0 |
| Yes | 1528 | 16.0 | |
| Increased consumption of any food because it was considered beneficial | No | 5330 | 56.0 |
| Yes | 4192 | 44.0 | |
| Increased consumption of any supplement because it was considered beneficial | No | 5582 | 58.6 |
| Yes | 3940 | 41.4 | |
| Increased consumption of any beverage because it was considered beneficial * | No | 6511 | 68.4 |
| Yes | 3011 | 31.6 | |
* Except alcoholic beverages.
Changes in habitual food intake; total population, and by demographic characteristics.
| Increased | Decreased | Maintained | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Frequency | 1980 | 2258 | 5284 | |
| Percentage | 20.79 | 23.71 | 55.49 | ||
| Woman | Frequency | 1455 | 1602 | 3553 | <0.0001 * |
| Percentage | 22.01 | 24.24 | 53.75 | ||
| Man | Frequency | 525 | 656 | 1731 | |
| Percentage | 18.03 | 22.53 | 59.44 | ||
| Rural | Frequency | 469 | 750 | 1455 | <0.0001 * |
| Percentage | 17.54 | 28.05 | 54.41 | ||
| Urban | Frequency | 1511 | 1508 | 3829 | |
| Percentage | 22.06 | 22.02 | 55.91 | ||
| Housewife-student-retiree | Frequency | 1630 | 2012 | 4514 | <0.0001 * |
| Percentage | 19.99 | 24.67 | 55.35 | ||
| Teacher-researcher | Frequency | 105 | 93 | 228 | |
| Percentage | 24.65 | 21.83 | 53.52 | ||
| Employee-entrepreneur-business owner | Frequency | 245 | 153 | 542 | |
| Percentage | 26.06 | 16.28 | 57.66 | ||
| Married-common law marriage | Frequency | 486 | 536 | 1205 | 0.4528 |
| Percentage | 21.82 | 24.07 | 54.11 | ||
| Separated-divorced-widowed | Frequency | 68 | 66 | 169 | |
| Percentage | 22.44 | 21.78 | 55.78 | ||
| Single | Frequency | 1426 | 1656 | 3910 | |
| Percentage | 20.39 | 23.68 | 55.92 | ||
| 18–40 years | Frequency | 1865 | 2166 | 4972 | 0.0043 * |
| Percentage | 20.72 | 24.06 | 55.23 | ||
| >40 years | Frequency | 115 | 92 | 312 | |
| Percentage | 22.16 | 17.73 | 60.12 | ||
* Statistically significant.
Sleep quality in the study population by sex.
| Woman | Man | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | N | % | ||
| Subjective sleep quality | <0.001 * | ||||
| Very good | 2036 | 30.8 | 959 | 32.9 | |
| Pretty good | 3131 | 47.4 | 1473 | 50.6 | |
| Pretty bad | 1008 | 15.2 | 368 | 12.6 | |
| Very bad | 435 | 6.6 | 112 | 3.8 | |
| Sleep duration | <0.001 * | ||||
| >7 h | 2966 | 44.9 | 1182 | 40.6 | |
| 6–7 h | 1338 | 20.2 | 657 | 22.6 | |
| 5–6 h | 1156 | 17.5 *a | 498 | 17.1 *a | |
| <5 h | 1050 | 17.4 | 575 | 19.7 | |
| Sleep efficiency | 0.265 | ||||
| >85% | 5050 | 76.4 *a | 2221 | 76.3 *a | |
| 75–84% | 0 | 0 *a | 0 | 0 *a | |
| 65–74% | 1323 | 20.0 *a | 604 | 20.7 *a | |
| <65% | 237 | 3.6 *a | 87 | 3.0 *a | |
| Sleep disturbance | <0.001 * | ||||
| No time in the month | 2033 | 30.8 | 1079 | 37.1 | |
| Less than once a week | 4577 | 69.2 | 1833 | 62.9 | |
| 1–2 times a week | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3 or more times a week | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Use of hypnotic medication | 0.011 * | ||||
| No time in the month | 5988 | 90.6 *a | 2629 | 90.3 *a | |
| Less than once a week | 323 | 4.9 | 180 | 6.2 | |
| 1–2 times a week | 171 | 2.6 *a | 60 | 2.1 *a | |
| 3 or more times a week | 128 | 1.9 *a | 43 | 1.5 *a | |
| Daytime dysfunction | <0.001 * | ||||
| No time in the month | 3214 | 48.6 | 1659 | 57 | |
| Less than once a week | 2672 | 40.4 | 1005 | 34.5 | |
| 1–2 times a week | 612 | 9.3 | 215 | 7.4 | |
| 3 or more times a week | 112 | 1.7 | 33 | 1.1 | |
| Sleep quality (Total score) | <0.001 * | ||||
| Poor quality of sleep | 3372 | 51 | 1369 | 47 | |
| Good sleep quality | 3238 | 49 | 1543 | 53 | |
Sleep quality measured according to the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), the six factors of the PSQI are presented: subjective sleep quality, sleep duration, sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of hypnotic medication and daytime dysfunction. Sleep latency does not occur because it does not have a practical interpretation. * The differences between all groups are statistically significant. *a The differences between the groups indicated with the subscript are not statistically significant.