| Literature DB >> 33806962 |
Tessa de Block1, Jolein Gyonne Elise Laumen1,2, Christophe Van Dijck1,2, Said Abdellati1, Irith De Baetselier1, Sheeba Santhini Manoharan-Basil1, Dorien Van den Bossche1, Chris Kenyon1,3.
Abstract
In this study, we characterized all oropharyngeal and anorectal isolates of Neisseria spp. in a cohort of men who have sex with men. This resulted in a panel of pathogenic Neisseria (N. gonorrhoeae [n = 5] and N. meningitidis [n = 5]) and nonpathogenic Neisseria (N. subflava [n = 11], N. mucosa [n = 3] and N. oralis [n = 2]). A high proportion of strains in this panel were resistant to azithromycin (18/26) and ceftriaxone (3/26). Whole genome sequencing (WGS) of these strains identified numerous mutations that are known to confer reduced susceptibility to azithromycin and ceftriaxone in N. gonorrhoeae. The presence or absence of these known mutations did not explain the high level resistance to azithromycin (>256 mg/L) in the nonpathogenic isolates (8/16). After screening for antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes, we found a ribosomal protection protein, Msr(D), in these highly azithromycin resistant nonpathogenic strains. The complete integration site originated from Streptococcus pneumoniae and is associated with high level resistance to azithromycin in many other bacterial species. This novel AMR resistance mechanism to azithromycin in nonpathogenic Neisseria could be a public health concern if it were to be transmitted to pathogenic Neisseria. This study demonstrates the utility of WGS-based surveillance of nonpathogenic Neisseria.Entities:
Keywords: antimicrobial resistance; commensal Neisseria; horizontal gene transfer; msrD
Year: 2021 PMID: 33806962 PMCID: PMC8005064 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens10030384
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pathogens ISSN: 2076-0817
Characterizations of all the strains in the panel.
| Species | Strain nr | Visit 1 | Sampling site 2 | MIC AZM 3 | AZM S/R 4 | MIC CRO 3 | CRO S/R 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| MO00014/1 | 1 | Anal | 2 | R | <0.016 | S |
|
| MO00020/1 | 1 | Anal | 0.75 | S | <0.016 | S |
|
| MO00023/1 | 1 | Anal | 0.19 | S | 0.016 | S |
|
| MO00038/1 | 1 | Anal | 0.25 | S | 0.016 | S |
|
| MO00044/1.3 | 1 | Anal | 0.25 | S | 0.016 | S |
|
| MO0003/1 | 1 | Oral | 1 | S | <0.016 | S |
|
| MO00012/1 | 1 | Oral | 0.5 | S | <0.016 | S |
|
| MO00015/1 | 1 | Oral | 1 | S | <0.016 | S |
|
| MO00015/2 | 1 | Oral | 0.75 | S | <0.016 | S |
|
| MO00021/1 | 1 | Oral | 1.5 | R | <0.016 | S |
|
| MO00018/1 | 1 | Oral | 4 | R | 0.094 | S |
|
| MO00032/1 | 2 | Oral | 4 | R | 0.094 | S |
|
| MO00012/2 | 1 | Oral | 24 | R | 0.064 | S |
|
| MO00029/2 | 2 | Oral | 16 | R | 0.047 | S |
|
| MO00018/2 | 1 | Oral | 6 | R | 0.125 | S |
|
| MO0003/2 | 1 | Oral | >256 | R | 0.75 | R |
|
| MO0009/1 | 1 | Oral | 3 | R | 0.023 | S |
|
| MO0009/2 | 1 | Oral | >256 | R | 0.032 | S |
|
| MO00027/1 | 2 | Oral | 24 | R | 0.023 | S |
|
| MO00027/2 | 2 | Oral | >256 | R | 0.75 | R |
|
| MO00029/1 | 2 | Oral | >256 | R | 0.064 | S |
|
| MO00036/1 | 2 | Oral | >256 | R | 0.125 | S |
|
| MO00036/2 | 2 | Oral | >256 | R | 0.125 | S |
|
| MO00041/1 | 2 | Oral | >256 | R | 0.75 | R |
|
| MO00045/1 | 1 | Oral | 6 | R | 0.047 | S |
|
| MO00049/1 | 2 | Oral | >256 | R | 0.032 | S |
1 Visit of patient; 1 = day 0, before treatment; 2 = day 14, after treatment. 2 Sampling site: oropharyngeal (oral) and anorectal (anal) swabs. 3 Minimum inhibitory concentrations of azithromycin (AZM) and ceftriaxone (CRO). 4 Breakpoint according to The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST); azithromycin (AZM) resistant (R) > 1 mg/L; ceftriaxone (CRO) resistant (R) ≥ 0.125 mg/L.
Figure 1Distribution of the MICs (mg/L) of azithromycin (A) and ceftriaxone (B) by species in the complete panel of 26 isolates. Dotted line indicates EUCAST breakpoint for N. gonorrhoeae (epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFF) for azithromycin) and species are coded by color.
Figure 2Visit 1 (1) and visit 2 (2) distribution of MICs (mg/L) of azithromycin and ceftriaxone in the panel: Azithromycin MIC distribution from visit 1 and visit 2 (A). Ceftriaxone MIC distribution from visit 1 and visit 2 (B). Dotted line indicates a breakpoint for N. gonorrhoeae (ECOFF for azithromycin) and species are coded by color.
Figure 3Presence (green) of resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) for macrolide and cephalosporin in this panel. Strains resistant to azithromycin and ceftriaxone are indicated with a red background, grey background indicates hypervariable region at the RAM position compared to pathogenic strains.
Figure 4Fragment of alignment of the mtr promoter region with mtrR and mtrCDE promoter sites (black box), mtrR binding site (blue bar) and inverted repeat (yellow bar). SNPs in the promoter and binding site compared to the N. gonorrhoeae wild type are colored in red. (Strain number with species; N. gonorrhoeae (Ng), N. meningitidis (Nm), N. oralis (No), N. mucosa (Nmu) and N. subflava (Ns)).
Figure 5Acquired antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes (green) in panel. Strains resistant to azithromycin and ceftriaxone are indicated with a red background.
Figure 6Schematic representation of genomic organization around the integration site. Integration site 30 bp downstream from DNA uptake sequence (DUS) was conserved in all N. subflava strains which acquired a portion of the macrolide efflux genetic assembly (MEGA) element. Whilst the msr(D) (yellow arrow) gene is full length, only a truncated 338 bp version of the mef(A) (red arrow) gene is present.
Figure 7cgMLST hierarchical gene-by-gene analysis of all strains in the panel (n = 26) with reference strains (N. mucosa: NZ_CP020452.2/CP020452.2 and CP028150.1. N. meningitidis: MC58 and NC_003112.2. N. gonorrhoeae: FA1090 and MS11. N. subflava: NZ_CP039887.1 and NZ_CP031251.1) based on core genomes. Species are coded by color and asterisks indicate N. subflava isolates with msr(D).