Literature DB >> 33806701

Preconditioning Stimulus Intensity Alters Paired-Pulse TMS Evoked Potentials.

Vishal Rawji1, Isabella Kaczmarczyk1, Lorenzo Rocchi1,2, Po-Yu Fong1,3,4, John C Rothwell1, Nikhil Sharma1.   

Abstract

Motor cortex (M1) paired-pulse TMS (ppTMS) probes excitatory and inhibitory intracortical dynamics by measurement of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs). However, MEPs reflect cortical and spinal excitabilities and therefore cannot isolate cortical function. Concurrent TMS-EEG has the ability to measure cortical function, while limiting peripheral confounds; TMS stimulates M1, whilst EEG acts as the readout: the TMS-evoked potential (TEP). Whilst varying preconditioning stimulus intensity influences intracortical inhibition measured by MEPs, the effects on TEPs is undefined. TMS was delivered to the left M1 using single-pulse and three, ppTMS paradigms, each using a different preconditioning stimulus: 70%, 80% or 90% of resting motor threshold. Corticospinal inhibition was present in all three ppTMS conditions. ppTMS TEP peaks were reduced predominantly under the ppTMS 70 protocol but less so for ppTMS 80 and not at all for ppTMS 90. There was a significant negative correlation between MEPs and N45 TEP peak for ppTMS 70 reaching statistical trends for ppTMS 80 and 90. Whilst ppTMS MEPs show inhibition across a range of preconditioning stimulus intensities, ppTMS TEPs do not. TEPs after M1 ppTMS vary as a function of preconditioning stimulus intensity: smaller preconditioning stimulus intensities result in better discriminability between conditioned and unconditioned TEPs. We recommend that preconditioning stimulus intensity should be minimized when using ppTMS to probe intracortical inhibition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; TEPs; TMS; TMS-EEG; cortical inhibition; paired-pulse TMS; short-interval intracortical inhibition

Year:  2021        PMID: 33806701      PMCID: PMC7998341          DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11030326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Sci        ISSN: 2076-3425


  40 in total

1.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data.

Authors:  Eric Maris; Robert Oostenveld
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 2.  The uses and interpretations of the motor-evoked potential for understanding behaviour.

Authors:  Sven Bestmann; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Analysing concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalographic data: A review and introduction to the open-source TESA software.

Authors:  Nigel C Rogasch; Caley Sullivan; Richard H Thomson; Nathan S Rose; Neil W Bailey; Paul B Fitzgerald; Faranak Farzan; Julio C Hernandez-Pavon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  High frequency somatosensory stimulation in dystonia: Evidence fordefective inhibitory plasticity.

Authors:  Roberto Erro; Lorenzo Rocchi; Elena Antelmi; Rocco Liguori; Michele Tinazzi; Alfredo Berardelli; John Rothwell; Kailash P Bhatia
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 10.338

5.  Short-interval and long-interval intracortical inhibition of TMS-evoked EEG potentials.

Authors:  Isabella Premoli; Julia Király; Florian Müller-Dahlhaus; Carl M Zipser; Pierre Rossini; Christoph Zrenner; Ulf Ziemann; Paolo Belardinelli
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the trigeminal nerve: intraoperative study on stimulation characteristics in man.

Authors:  U D Schmid; A R Møller; J Schmid
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.217

7.  Short latency intracortical inhibition: one of the most popular tools in human motor neurophysiology.

Authors:  J C Rothwell; B L Day; P D Thompson; T Kujirai
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Focal stimulation of the posterior parietal cortex increases the excitability of the ipsilateral motor cortex.

Authors:  Giacomo Koch; Miguel Fernandez Del Olmo; Binith Cheeran; Diane Ruge; Sven Schippling; Carlo Caltagirone; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Variability and Predictors of Response to Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation: A TMS-EEG Study.

Authors:  Lorenzo Rocchi; Jaime Ibáñez; Alberto Benussi; Ricci Hannah; Vishal Rawji; Elias Casula; John Rothwell
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Impaired automatic but intact volitional inhibition in primary tic disorders.

Authors:  Vishal Rawji; Sachin Modi; Anna Latorre; Lorenzo Rocchi; Leanne Hockey; Kailash Bhatia; Eileen Joyce; John C Rothwell; Marjan Jahanshahi
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Action Selection and Motor Decision Making: Insights from Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Margherita Tecilla; Andrea Guerra; Lorenzo Rocchi; Sara Määttä; Matteo Bologna; Maria Herrojo Ruiz; Roberta Biundo; Angelo Antonini; Florinda Ferreri
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-05-12

Review 2.  Modulating Frontal Networks' Timing-Dependent-Like Plasticity With Paired Associative Stimulation Protocols: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Giacomo Guidali; Camilla Roncoroni; Nadia Bolognini
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  The effect of stimulation frequency on transcranial evoked potentials.

Authors:  Giorgio Leodori; Lorenzo Rocchi; Marco Mancuso; Maria Ilenia De Bartolo; Viola Baione; Matteo Costanzo; Daniele Belvisi; Antonella Conte; Giovanni Defazio; Alfredo Berardelli
Journal:  Transl Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 1.264

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.