| Literature DB >> 33806613 |
Senesie Swaray1,2, Mohd Y Rafii1,3, Mohd Din Amiruddin4, Mohd Firdaus Ismail1, Syari Jamian5, Momodu Jalloh1,2, Yusuff Oladosu3, Mohd Mustakim Mohamad4, Marhalil Marjuni4, Olalekan Kazeem Kolapo3, Samuel Chibuike Chukwu3.
Abstract
This study was conducted to assess the Elaeidobius kamerunicus (EK) population density among the biparental dura × pisifera hybrids' palms on deep peat-soil. Twenty-four hybrids derived from 10 genetic sources were used. Variance analysis showed that the EK population density varies between different oil palm hybrids, with a more noticeable variation of a low population mean in the male weevil across the hybrids. The highest weevil population mean/spikelet was attained on the third day of anthesis. The maximum monthly population of EK/spikelet (12.81 ± 0.23) and population density of EK (1846.49 ± 60.69) were recorded in January. Accordingly, 41.67% of the hybrids recorded an EK population density greater than the trial means of 973.68 weevils. Hybrid ECPHP550 had the highest mean of EK/spikelet (10.25 ± 0.11) and the highest population density of EK/palm (1241.39 ± 73.74). The parental mean population was 963.24 weevils and parent Deli-Banting × AVROS recorded the highest EK population density (1173.01). The overall results showed a notable disparity in the EK population among the biparental hybrids. Parental Deli-Banting × AVROS and hybrid ECPHP550 could be more useful to optimize the weevil population for pollination improvements in palm plantations. However, we suggest that volatile production should be included as a desirable trait in oil palm selective breeding.Entities:
Keywords: Elaeidobius kamerunicus; fruit-set; genetic origins; hybrids; oil palm; pollination; population density
Year: 2021 PMID: 33806613 PMCID: PMC8000653 DOI: 10.3390/insects12030221
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Insects ISSN: 2075-4450 Impact factor: 2.769
List of dura × pisifera (D × P) hybrids used in this study.
| S/N | Crossing Materials | Pedigree No. ♂ Palm × ♀ Palm | Code |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AVROS × Deli Banting | 0.394/456 × 0.279/24 | ECPHP415 |
| 2 | Nigeria × Deli Ulu Remis | 0.337/552 × 0.338/361 | ECPHP500 |
| 3 | AVROS × Deli Banting | 0.394/234 × 0.279/24 | ECPHP550 |
| 4 | AVROS × Deli Johor Labis | 0.394/234 × 0.281/44 | ECPHP618 |
| 5 | AVROS × Deli Ulu Remis | 0.174/480 × 0.254/191 | PK4118 |
| 6 | AVROS × Angola | 0.174/480 × 0.311/405 | PK4465 |
| 7 | Nigeria × Tanzania | 0.337/1092 × 0.256/2058 | PK4474 |
| 8 | AVROS × Angola | 0.394/24 × 0.311/405 | PK4482 |
| 9 | AVROS × Angola | 0.174/247 × 0.312/99 | PK4504 |
| 10 | Avros × Angola | 0.174/211 × 0.311/269 | PK4505 |
| 11 | Yangambi × Deli Ulu Remis | 0.395/204 × 0.332/451 | PK4529 |
| 12 | AVROS × Deli Ulu Remis | 0.394/24 × 0.332/100 | PK4535 |
| 13 | Nigeria, × Angola | 0.337/1092 × 0.312/682 | PK4539 |
| 14 | Nigeria × Deli Ulu Remis | 0.337/1092 × 0.332/218 | PK4540 |
| 15 | Yangambi × Deli Ulu Remis | 0.395/204 × 0.332/45 | PK4548 |
| 16 | AVROS × Deli Ulu Remis | 0.395/419 × 0.332/278 | PK4550 |
| 17 | AVROS × Tanzania | 0.394/24 × 0.256/2313 | PK4570 |
| 18 | AVROS × Deli Ulu Remis | 0.395/419 × 0.332/340 | PK4591 |
| 19 | Nigeria × Deli Ulu Remis | 0.337/554 × 0.332/220 | PK4621 |
| 20 | Nigeria × Deli Ulu Remis | 0.337/1091 × 0.332/116 | PK4648 |
| 21 | Nigeria × Tanzania | 0.337/1092 × 0.256/2425 | PK4651 |
| 22 | AVROS × Deli Ulu Remis | 0.395/372 × 0.332/116 | PK4674 |
| 23 | Nigeria × Angola | 0.337/291 × 0.312/1241 | PK4679 |
| 24 | Cameroon × Deli Serdang | 0.219/1371 × 0.212/6 | PK4841 |
Notes: AVROS, Algemene Vereniging; ECPHP, Elaeis guineensis crossing program Hulu Paka; PK, Porim Kluang; P, pisifera palm; D, dura palm.
Figure 1Malaysian Palm Oil Board (MPOB) experimental palms (biparental dura × pisifera hybrids) at Trial 0.502, Teluk-Intan research station, Malaysia.
Figure 2Collected samples of E. kamerunicus and determination of male and female: (A) harvesting of anthesising male inflorescence spikelets; (B) collected samples of E. kamerunicus; (C) spikelets and pollinator weevils; (D) assorted male and female E. kamerunicus; (E) male lateral view of E. kamerunicus; (F) female lateral view of E. Kamerunicus.
ANOVA and variance components for the population of Elaeidobius kamerunicus per spikelet on each day of anthesis.
| S/V | DF | MD1 | FD1 | EKD1 | MD2 | FD2 | EKD2 | MD3 | FD3 | EKD3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Replications (R) | 3 | ˂0.01 ns | 0.01 ns | 0.01 ns | 0.02 ns | 0.10 ns | 0.11 ns | 0.13 ns | 2.16 ns | 1.98 ns |
| Hybrids (G) | 23 | 0.01 ns | 0.08 ** | 0.10 ** | 0.11 ** | 1.29 ** | 1.87 ** | 0.38 ** | 5.92 ** | 8.87 ** |
| Error (e) | 60 | ˂0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 12.17 | 0.28 | 4.33 | 0.76 | 1.10 |
| Variance component | ||||||||||
| σ2g | ˂0.01 | ˂0.01 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.28 | 0.42 | 0.08 | 1.33 | 2.03 | |
| σ2e | ˂0.01 | ˂0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.2 | 0.27 | 0.07 | 0.76 | 1.07 | |
| σ2ph | ˂0.01 | ˂0.01 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.48 | 0.69 | 0.15 | 2.09 | 3.10 | |
| Mean | 0.22 | 1.08 | 1.3 | 1.73 | 6.27 | 7.99 | 3.42 | 12.94 | 16.36 | |
| Std Error | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.04 | 0.16 | 0.19 | |
| S/V | DF | MD4 | FD4 | EKD4 | MD5 | FD5 | EKD5 | MD6 | FD6 | EKD6 |
| Replications (R) | 3 | 0.10 ns | 1.57 * | 1.75 * | 0.01 ns | 0.18 ns | 0.22 ns | ˂0.01 ns | ˂0.01 ns | ˂0.01 ns |
| Hybrids (G) | 23 | 0.13 ** | 1.48 ** | 2.27 ** | 0.04 ns | 0.31 ** | 0.52 ** | ˂0.01 ns | 0.01 ** | 0.01 ** |
| Error (e) | 60 | 0.05 | 0.37 | 0.59 | 0.03 | 0.10 | 0.17 | ˂0.01 | ˂0.01 | ˂0.01 |
| Variance component | ||||||||||
| σ2g | 0.02 | 0.30 | 0.46 | ˂0.01 | 0.06 | 0.10 | ˂0.01 | ˂0.01 | ˂0.01 | |
| σ2e | 0.05 | 0.37 | 0.59 | 0.03 | 0.11 | 0.17 | ˂0.01 | ˂0.01 | ˂0.01 | |
| σ2ph | 0.07 | 0.67 | 1.05 | 0.034 | 0.17 | 0.27 | ˂0.01 | ˂0.01 | ˂0.01 | |
| Mean | 2.14 | 7.02 | 9.16 | 1.02 | 3.13 | 4.15 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.09 | |
| Stderr | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.06 | ˂0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
Notes: S/V, source of variation; DF, degree of freedom; EK, Elaeidobius kamerunicus; MD1, male day-one; FD1, female day-one; EKD1, EK day-one; MD2, male day-two; FD2, female day-two; EKD2, EK day-two; MD3, male day-three; FD3, female day-three; EKD3, EK day-three; MD4, male day-four; FD4, female day-four; EKD4, EK day-four; MD5, male day-five; FD5, female day-five; EKD5, EK day-five; MD6, male day-six; FD6, female day-six, EKD6, EK day-six; ns, non-significant at p > 0.05; * significant at p < 0.05; ** highly significant at p < 0.01; ()+, phenotypic variance in percentage; σ2g, variance in number of weevils between palm genotypes; σ2e, error variance; σ2ph, phenotypic variance; Stderr, standard error.
Figure 3Population means of male Elaeidobius kamerunicus per spikelet on each stage of anthesis in biparental hybrids. Mean ± standard error are presented in the figure as each data point: MD1 (male day-one), MD2 (male day-two), MD3 (male day-three), MD4 (male day-four), MD5 (male day-five), MD6 (male day-six); ECPHP, Elaeis guineensis crossing program Hulu Paka; PK, Porim Kluang; Tukey’s studentized range (HSD) at p ˂ 0.05.
Figure 4Female Elaeidobius kamerunicus population mean per spikelet on each anthesis phase in biparental hybrids. Mean ± standard errors are presented in the figure as each data point: FD1 (female day-one), FD2 (female day-two), FD3 (female day-three), FD4 (female day-four), FD5 (female day-five), FD6 (female day-six); ECPHP, Elaeis guineensis crossing program Hulu Paka; PK, Porim Kluang; Tukey’s studentized range (HSD) at p ˂ 0.05.
Figure 5Mean of all hybrids of Elaeidobius kamerunicus (EK) population that emerged on male inflorescence per spikelet on each anthesis day (1–6). Means and the standard error are presented in the figure as each data point: EKD1 (EK day-one), EKD2 (EK day-two), EKD3 (EK day-three), EKD4 (EK day-four), EKD5 (EK day-five), and EKD6 (EK day-six).
Analysis of variance and monthly population mean ± standard error per spikelet and population density of E. kamerunicus in D × P hybrids.
| S/V | DF | MEK/S | PD/EK |
|---|---|---|---|
| Replications (R) | 3 | 3.41 ns | 203,442.10 ns |
| Months (M) | 11 | 684.25 ** | 18,934,909.40 ** |
| Hybrids (G) | 23 | 27.07 ** | 863,523.40 ** |
| M*G | 253 | 3.63 ** | 140,595.90 * |
| Error (e) | 753 | 1.91 | 117,313.40 |
| Mean | 8.55 | 973.68 | |
| Stderr | 0.10 | 18.31 | |
| No. | Month | ||
| 1 | February 2019 | 10.14 c ± 0.15 | 1158.57 d ± 41.28 |
| 2 | March 2019 | 11.41 b ± 0.27 | 1526.78 b ± 69.00 |
| 3 | April 2019 | 7.57 d ± 0.14 | 709.34 ef ± 24.45 |
| 4 | May 2019 | 5.92 e ± 0.22 | 548.02 f ± 31.91 |
| 5 | June 2019 | 7.70 d ± 0.17 | 1216.00 cd ± 46.79 |
| 6 | July 2019 | 8.22 d ± 0.17 | 653.38 ef ± 25.38 |
| 7 | August 2019 | 3.96 f ± 0.12 | 360.63 g ± 14.24 |
| 8 | September 2019 | 4.36 f ± 0.17 | 359.57 g ± 16.71 |
| 9 | October 2019 | 10.62 c ± 0.16 | 1218.66 cd ±34.92 |
| 10 | November 2019 | 8.10 d ±0.16 | 729.16 e ± 23.24 |
| 11 | December 2019 | 11.79 b ±0.18 | 1357.58 bc ± 49.55 |
| 12 | January 2020 | 12.81 a ± 0.23 | 1846.49 a ± 60.69 |
| Hybrid | |||
| 1 | ECPHP415 | 8.91 b–e ± 0.13 | 1104.63 a–e ± 99.34 |
| 2 | ECPHP500 | 9.80 ab ± 0.26 | 1226.82 ab ± 61.21 |
| 3 | ECPHP550 | 10.25 a ± 0.11 | 1241.39 a ± 73.74 |
| 4 | ECPHP618 | 8.74 b–e ± 0.32 | 959.91 b–f ± 72.82 |
| 5 | PK4118 | 9.01 b–e ± 0.22 | 1149.72 a–c ± 62.19 |
| 6 | PK4465 | 7.99 d–f ± 0.05 | 975.24 a–f ± 40.75 |
| 7 | PK4474 | 8.49 c–f ± 0.2 | 1053.40 a–f ± 6.06 |
| 8 | PK4482 | 8.06 d–f ± 0.21 | 941.35 c–f ± 74.68 |
| 9 | PK4504 | 8.67 c–e ± 0.5 | 980.68 a–f ± 60.58 |
| 10 | PK4505 | 8.77 b–e ± 0.19 | 988.46 a–f ± 27.02 |
| 11 | PK4529 | 7.94 d–f ± 0.38 | 840.10 d–g ± 37.38 |
| 12 | PK4535 | 8.47 c–f ± 0.19 | 899.19 c–g ± 49.06 |
| 13 | PK4539 | 7.42 fg ± 0.14 | 813.47 fg ± 24.54 |
| 14 | PK4540 | 7.91 ef ± 0.15 | 880.07 c–g ± 19.5 |
| 15 | PK4548 | 8.25 d–f ± 0.39 | 833.60 e–g ± 22.37 |
| 16 | PK4550 | 8.38 c–f ± 0.21 | 986.65 a–f ± 58.97 |
| 17 | PK4570 | 8.33 c–f ± 0.16 | 885.42 c–g ± 30.67 |
| 18 | PK4591 | 8.51 c–f ± 0.23 | 928.37 c–f ± 39.54 |
| 19 | PK4621 | 6.49 g ± 0.33 | 629.90 g ± 44.09 |
| 20 | PK4648 | 9.43 a–c ± 0.2 | 1108.05 a–d ± 94.8 |
| 21 | PK4651 | 8.96 b–e ± 0.26 | 1023.26 a–f ± 46.12 |
| 22 | PK4674 | 8.33 c–f ± 0.41 | 992.81 a–f ± 47.68 |
| 23 | PK4679 | 9.04 b–d ± 0.28 | 977.63 a–f ± 28.8 |
| 24 | PK4841 | 8.53 c–e ± 0.27 | 919.31 c–f ± 66.73 |
| Mean ± Stderr | 8.55 ± 0.10 | 973.68 ± 18.31 | |
Notes: S/V, source of variation; DF, degree of freedom; MEK/S, mean of Elaeidobius kamerunicus spikelet; PD/EK, population density of Elaeidobius kamerunicus; ECPHP, Elaeis guineensis crossing program Hulu Paka; PK, Porim Kluang; Stderr, standard error; ns, non-significant at p > 0.05; * significant at p < 0.05; ** highly significant at p < 0.01. Means with the same letter of alphabet in the same column are not significantly different at p < 0.05 with Tukey’s studentized range (HSD).
Figure 6Spikelet means per male inflorescence and population means of Elaeidobius kamerunicus on male inflorescence among the dura and pisifera genetic origins: SM/MI, number of spikelets per male inflorescence; PD/EK population force of Elaeidobius kamerunicus; AVROS, Algemene Vereniging Rubber planters; DB× AVROS, Deli Banting × AVROS; DUR×N, Deli Ulu Remis × Nigeria; DJL× AVROS, Deli Johor Labis; DUR × AVROS, Deli Ulu Remis × AVROS; A× AVROS, Angola × AVROS; T × N, Tanzania × Nigeria; DUR × Y, Deli Ulu Remis × Yangambi; A × N, Angola × Nigeria; T × A, Tanzania × AVROS; DS × C, Deli Serdang × Cameroon.