| Literature DB >> 33806578 |
Paola Della Valle1,2, Marco Fabbri1,2, Fabiana Madotto2, Pietro Ferrara1,2, Paolo Cozzolino2, Elisabetta Calabretto2, Marco Italo D'Orso3, Ermanno Longhi2, Riccardo Polosa4,5, Michele Augusto Riva1, Giampiero Mazzaglia1, Carmen Sommese2, Lorenzo Giovanni Mantovani1,2.
Abstract
Sero-epidemiological surveys are valuable attempts to estimate the circulation of SARS-CoV-2 in general or selected populations. Within this context, a prospective observational study was conducted to estimate the prevalence and persistence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in different categories of workers and factors associated with positivity, through the detection of virus-specific immunoglobulin G and M (IgG/IgM) in serum samples. Enrollees were divided in low exposure and medium-high groups on the basis of their work activity. Antibody responders were re-contacted after 3 months for the follow-up. Of 2255 sampled workers, 4.8% tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM antibodies, with 81.7% to IgG only. Workers who continued to go to their place of work, were healthcare workers, or experienced at least one COVID-19-related symptom were more likely to test positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. SARS-CoV-2 antibodies prevalence was significantly higher in the medium-high risk vs. low-risk group (7.2% vs. 3.0%, p < 0.0001). At 3-month follow-up, 81.3% of subjects still had antibody response. This study provided important information of SARS-CoV-2 infection prevalence among workers in northern Italy, where the impact of COVID-19 was particularly intense. The presented surveillance data give a contribution to refine current estimates of the disease burden expected from the SARS-CoV-2.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; antibody persistence; occupational exposure; seroprevalence
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33806578 PMCID: PMC7967539 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18052567
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390