Mara Morelli1, Flavio Urbini2, Dora Bianchi3, Roberto Baiocco3, Elena Cattelino4, Fiorenzo Laghi3, Piotr Sorokowski5, Michal Misiak5, Martyna Dziekan6, Heather Hudson7, Alexandra Marshall8, Thanh Truc T Nguyen9, Lauren Mark9, Kamil Kopecky10, René Szotkowski10, Ezgi Toplu Demirtaş11, Joris Van Ouytsel12,13, Koen Ponnet14, Michel Walrave12, Tingshao Zhu15, Ya Chen15, Nan Zhao15, Xiaoqian Liu15, Alexander Voiskounsky16, Nataliya Bogacheva17, Maria Ioannou18, John Synnott18, Kalliopi Tzani-Pepelasi18, Vimala Balakrishnan19, Moses Okumu20, Eusebius Small21, Silviya Pavlova Nikolova22, Michelle Drouin23, Antonio Chirumbolo2. 1. Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology and Health Studies, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy. 2. Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy. 3. Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy. 4. Department of Human and Social Sciences, University of Valle D'Aosta, 11100 Aosta, Italy. 5. Institute of Psychology, University of Wroclaw, 50-527 Wrocław, Poland. 6. Department of Psychology and Cognitive Science, Adam Mickiewicz University, 60-658 Poznań, Poland. 7. Department of Health Sciences, University of Central Arkansas, Conway, AR 72035, USA. 8. College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA. 9. College of Education, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA. 10. Centre for Prevention of Risky Virtual Communication, Palacky University Olomouc, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic. 11. Psychological Counseling and Guidance, MEF University, Istanbul 34396, Turkey. 12. Department of Communication Studies, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium. 13. Hugh Downs School of Human Communication, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA. 14. Department of Communication Sciences, imec-mict-Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium. 15. Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100864, China. 16. Department of General Psychology, Lomonosow Moscow State University, 101000 Moscow, Russia. 17. Department of Pedagogy and Medical Psychology, Sechenov University, 101000 Moscow, Russia. 18. Department of Psychology, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK. 19. Department of Information System, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia. 20. School of Social Work, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. 21. School of Social Work, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA. 22. Department of Social Medicine and Healthcare Organization, Medical University-Varna, 9000 Varna, Bulgaria. 23. Department of Psychology, Purdue University Fort Wayne, Fort Wayne, IN 46805, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sexting is an increasingly common phenomenon among adolescents and young adults. Some studies have investigated the role of personality traits in different sexting behaviors within mainstream personality taxonomies like Big Five and HEXACO. However, very few studies have investigated the role of maladaptive personality factors in sexting. Therefore, the present study investigated the relationship between Dark Triad Personality Traits and experimental (i.e., sharing own sexts), risky (i.e., sexting under substance use and with strangers), and aggravated sexting (i.e., non-consensual sexting and sexting under pressure) across 11 countries. METHODS: An online survey was completed by 6093 participants (Mage = 20.35; SDage = 3.63) from 11 different countries which covered four continents (Europe, Asia, Africa, and America). Participants completed the Sexting Behaviors Questionnaire and the 12-item Dark Triad Dirty Dozen scale. RESULTS: Hierarchical regression analyses showed that sharing own sexts was positively predicted by Machiavellianism and Narcissism. Both risky and aggravated sexting were positively predicted by Machiavellianism and Psychopathy. CONCLUSIONS: The present study provided empirical evidence that different sexting behaviors were predicted by Dark Triad Personality Traits, showing a relevant role of Machiavellianism in all kinds of investigated sexting behaviors. Research, clinical, and education implications for prevention programs are discussed.
BACKGROUND: Sexting is an increasingly common phenomenon among adolescents and young adults. Some studies have investigated the role of personality traits in different sexting behaviors within mainstream personality taxonomies like Big Five and HEXACO. However, very few studies have investigated the role of maladaptive personality factors in sexting. Therefore, the present study investigated the relationship between Dark Triad Personality Traits and experimental (i.e., sharing own sexts), risky (i.e., sexting under substance use and with strangers), and aggravated sexting (i.e., non-consensual sexting and sexting under pressure) across 11 countries. METHODS: An online survey was completed by 6093 participants (Mage = 20.35; SDage = 3.63) from 11 different countries which covered four continents (Europe, Asia, Africa, and America). Participants completed the Sexting Behaviors Questionnaire and the 12-item Dark Triad Dirty Dozen scale. RESULTS: Hierarchical regression analyses showed that sharing own sexts was positively predicted by Machiavellianism and Narcissism. Both risky and aggravated sexting were positively predicted by Machiavellianism and Psychopathy. CONCLUSIONS: The present study provided empirical evidence that different sexting behaviors were predicted by Dark Triad Personality Traits, showing a relevant role of Machiavellianism in all kinds of investigated sexting behaviors. Research, clinical, and education implications for prevention programs are discussed.
Entities:
Keywords:
adolescents; cross-country investigation; dark triad traits; personality; sexting; young adults
Authors: Cristian Molla Esparza; Pablo Nájera; Emelina López-González; Josep-Maria Losilla Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-31 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Małgorzata Dębska; Paweł Dębski; Jacek Polechoński; Michał Rozpara; Rajmund Tomik Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-13 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Dora Bianchi; Roberto Baiocco; Antonia Lonigro; Sara Pompili; Marta Zammuto; Daniele Di Tata; Mara Morelli; Antonio Chirumbolo; Anna Di Norcia; Eleonora Cannoni; Emiddia Longobardi; Fiorenzo Laghi Journal: Sex Res Social Policy Date: 2021-09-23