| Literature DB >> 33806119 |
Marcela N Rosa1, Larissa R V E Silva1, Giovanna B Longato1,2, Adriane F Evangelista1, Izabela N F Gomes1, Ana Laura V Alves1, Bruno G de Oliveira3, Fernanda E Pinto3, Wanderson Romão3, Allisson R de Rezende4, Arali A C Araújo4, Lohanna S F M Oliveira5, Alessandra A de M Souza5, Stephanie C Oliveira5, Rosy Iara M de A Ribeiro5, Viviane A O Silva1, Rui M Reis1,6,7.
Abstract
Cervical cancer is the third most common in Brazilian women. The chemotherapy used for the treatment of this disease can cause many side effects; then, to overcome this problem, new treatment options are necessary. Natural compounds represent one of the most promising sources for the development of new drugs. In this study, 13 different species of 6 families from the Brazilian Cerrado vegetation biome were screened against human cervical cancer cell lines (CCC). Some of these species were also evaluated in one normal keratinocyte cell line (HaCaT). The effect of crude extracts on cell viability was evaluated by a colorimetric method (MTS assay). Extracts from Annona crassiflora, Miconia albicans, Miconia chamissois, Stryphnodendron adstringens, Tapirira guianensis, Xylopia aromatica, and Achyrocline alata showed half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values < 30 μg/mL for at least one CCC. A. crassiflora and S. adstringens extracts were selective for CCC. Mass spectrometry (Electrospray Ionization Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometer (ESI FT-ICR MS)) of A. crassiflora identified fatty acids and flavonols as secondary compounds. One of the A. crassiflora fractions, 7C24 (from chloroform partition), increased H2AX phosphorylation (suggesting DNA damage), PARP cleavage, and cell cycle arrest in CCC. Kaempferol-3-O-rhamnoside and oleic acid were bioactive molecules identified in 7C24 fraction. These findings emphasize the importance of investigating bioactive molecules from natural sources for developing new anti-cancer drugs.Entities:
Keywords: Annonaceae; Asteraceae; Fabaceae; Melastomataceae; cervical cancer; cytotoxicity
Year: 2021 PMID: 33806119 PMCID: PMC8036847 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22073383
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Effect of different natural crude extracts on viability of cervical cancer cell lines. Cellular viability was measured at 72 h by MTS assay. The results were expressed as the mean percentage ± SD of viable cells relatively to the DMSO alone (viability considered to be 100%). The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) concentrations were calculated by nonlinear regression analysis using Graphpad Prism software. Data represent the mean of at least two independent experiments performed in triplicate. Concentrations of crude extracts ranged from 2.5 to 300 µg/mL. Cisplatin concentrations ranged from 0.12 to 30 µg/mL.
IC50 values (µg/mL) 1 of all crude extracts in human cancer cell lines.
| Crude Extracts or Chemotherapeutic | CaSki | SiHa | HeLa |
|---|---|---|---|
| 75.39 ± 46.94 | 121.90 ± 20.08 | 42.63 ± 13.33 | |
| 168.70 ± 34.67 | 103.10 ± 48.13 | 105.30 ± 9.36 | |
| 84.77 ± 12.78 | 92.83 ± 30.75 | 33.34 ± 2.04 | |
| 8.24 ± 1.08 | 42.44 ± 3.62 | 18.73 ± 1.80 | |
| >300 | >300 | 120.7 ± 9.97 | |
| 71.75 ± 11.53 | 115.90 ± 39.19 | 47.85 ± 14.26 | |
| 93.16 ± 16.89 | 132.80 ± 50.25 | 39.31 ± 1.56 | |
| 111.20 ± 10.39 | 165.40 ± 60.67 | 63.36 ± 3.95 | |
| 169.50 ± 19.37 | 45.40 ± 0.00 | 108.70 ± 31.87 | |
| 77.55 ± 14.92 | 108.80 ± 5.80 | 91.95 ± 13.51 | |
| 68.44 ± 19.31 | 116.10 ± 0.92 | 26.95 ± 4.88 | |
| 46.15 ± 8.37 | 109.60 ± 1.34 | 11.01 ± 0.84 | |
| 21.12 ± 4.49 | 47.01 ± 15.78 | 31.93 ± 4.42 | |
| Cisplatin | 2.21 ± 0.42 | 15.48 ± 0.74 | 6.70 ± 0.43 |
1 Values represent mean ± S.D.
Selectivity index values of two crude extracts in human cell lines.
| Crude Extracts | Selectivity Index | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| CaSki | SiHa | HeLa | |
|
| 7.86 | 1.53 | 3.46 |
|
| 4.36 | 1.96 | 2.88 |
| Cisplatin | 2.08 | 0.29 | 0.69 |
IC50 values (µg/mL) 1 of A. crassiflora partitions in human cervical cancer cell lines.
| Partition | Uterine Cervix Cancer Cell Lines | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| CaSki | SiHa | HeLa | |
| 7A | 12.17 ± 2.32 | >50.00 | 30.99 ± 3.89 |
| 7C | 15.56 ± 1.85 | 28.54 ± 4.81 | 9.45 ± 2.25 |
| 7D | 7.03 ± 0.43 | 37.21 ± 16.41 | 17.11 ± 0.12 |
1 Values represent mean ± S.D.
Proposed structures by Electrospray Ionization Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry (ESI (-) FT-ICR MS) for the identified molecules of chloroform partition of A. crassiflora.
| Error (ppm) | DBE | [M-H]− | Proposed Compound | Reference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 255.23315 | 255.23295 | −0.75 | 1 | [C16H32O2− H+]− | Hexadecanoic acid (palmitic acid) | [ |
| 281.24884 | 281.24860 | −0.85 | 2 | [C18H34O2− H+]− | (Z)-9-Octadecenoic acid (oleic acid) | KNApSAcK database; [ |
| 297.24379 | 297.24352 | −0.92 | 2 | [C18H34O3− H+]− | Ricinoleic acid | KNApSAcK database; [ |
| 353.08821 | 353.08781 | −1.13 | 8 | [C16H18O9− H+]− | 4-O-E-caffeoylquinic acid | [ |
| 415.12514 | 415.12459 | −1.35 | 7 | [C18H24O11− H+]− | Alpinoside | KNApSAcK database |
| 463.08891 | 463.08820 | −1.53 | 12 | [C21H20O12− H+]- | Quercetin 3-O-glucoside | [ |
| 477.10455 | 477.10385 | −1.46 | 12 | [C22H22O12− H+]− | Quercetin- | [ |
| 281.24879 | 281.24860 | −0.66 | 2 | [C18H34O2− H+]− | (Z)-9-Octadecenoic acid (oleic acid) | KNApSAcK database; [ |
| 431.09868 | 431.09837 | −0.72 | 12 | [C21H20O10− H+]− | kaempferol-3-O-rhamnoside | [ |
m/z (mass-to-charge ratio); ppm (parts per million); DBE (double bond equivalent).
IC50 values 1 of A. crassiflora fractions in cervical cancer cells.
| Partition | IC50 (µg/mL) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uterine Cervix Cancer Cell Lines | ||||
| CaSki | SiHa | HeLa | C4-I | |
| 7C18 | - | >50.00 | >50.00 | - |
| 7C22 | - | >50.00 | >50.00 | - |
| 7C24 | 34.8 ± 3.67 | 33.88 ± 4.17 | 15.96 ± 0.89 | 15.01 ± 5.20 |
| 7C25 | 41.14 ± 6.86 | >50.00 | 35.55 ± 1.06 | 23.9 ± 8.74 |
| 7C28 | 29.13 ± 8.34 | 35.85 ± 8.29 | 27.7 ± 2.86 | 13.9 ± 5.16 |
| 7C39 | - | >50.00 | >50.00 | - |
| 7C45 | >50.00 | >50.00 | 39.64 ± 0.86 | 31.95 ± 10.66 |
| 7C52 | - | >50.00 | >50.00 | - |
| 7C57 | >50.00 | >50.00 | 32.58 ± 0.69 | 14.30 ± 6.76 |
| 7C60 | 32.11 ± 8.90 | >50.00 | 23.47 ± 10.56 | 17.40 ± 4.13 |
1 Values represent mean ± S.D.—(Not tested).
Figure 2Fraction 7C24 and cell processes (DNA damage, apoptosis, and cell cycle) in SiHa and HeLa cell lines. SiHa and HeLa cells were treated with 7C24 (IC50 33.88 and 15.96 µg/mL, respectively) and cisplatin (13.01 and 9.36 µg/mL, respectively). Western blotting for phospho-H2AX, PARP, and p21 after 24 h of treatment (a). Flow cytometry of SiHa 24 h after 7C24 treatment, mean ± SD of two independent experiments (b). C + (present),—(absent). ** p < 0.01.
Proposed structures for components of the 7C24 fraction of A. crassiflora.
| Error (ppm) | DBE | [M-H]− | Proposed Compound | Reference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 281.24879 | 281.24860 | −0.66 | 2 | [C18H34O2− H+]− | (Z)-9-Octadecenoic acid (oleic acid) | KNApSAcK database; [ |
| 431.09868 | 431.09837 | −0.72 | 12 | [C21H20O10− H+]− | kaempferol-3-O-rhamnoside | [ |
m/z (mass-to-charge ratio); ppm (parts per million); DBE (double bond equivalent).
Characteristics of the Cerrado plant species.
| Crude Extracts Identification | Vernacular Name | Scientific Name | Family | Register |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pau pombo, Carvoeiro, Arapaçu, Carvoeiro do Cerrado |
| Fabaceae | 143407 BHCB |
| 2 | Gonçalo-Alves |
| Anacardiaceae | 143403 BHCB |
| 3 | Pimenta-de-Macaco |
| Annonaceae | 43397 BHCB |
| 7 | Araticum, ariticum |
| Annonaceae | 143400 BHCB |
| 8 | Negramina, Caapitiú,Catingueira-de-paca, Erva-de-rato |
| Siparunaceae | 143404 BHCB |
| 10 | Jatei-kaá |
| Asteraceae | 11486 CGMS |
| 14-I | Pata-de-vaca ou casco-de-vaca lilás |
| Fabaceae | 161589 BHCB |
| 15-I | Pata-de-vaca branca ou casco-de-vaca branco |
| Fabaceae | 161590 BHCB |
| 16-I | Pata-de-viado |
| Fabaceae | 161588 BHCB |
| 17 | Pixirica-da-mata |
| Melastomataceae | 44998 HUFU |
| 18 | Canela de velho |
| Melastomataceae | 56558 HUFU |
| 19 | Pixirica-açu, Roxinha do brejo, Fruta de Chupim do brejo, Folha larga do brejo e folha de bolo |
| Melastomataceae | 59592 HUFU |
| 21-I | Barbatimão |
| Fabaceae | 169871 BHCB |
BHCB (Herbarium of the Federal University of Minas Gerais); CGMS (Herbarium of the Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande campus, Brazil); HUFU (Herbarium of the Federal University of Uberlândia).
Cancer cell lines in the main panel.
| Cell Line | Tissue | Histologic Type | Gender | Age | Supplier | Culture Medium | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CaSki * | Uterine cervix | Squamous cell carcinoma | Female | 40 | ATCC | DMEM |
| 2 | SiHa * | Uterine cervix | Squamous cell carcinoma | Female | 55 | ATCC | DMEM |
| 3 | HeLa | Uterine cervix | Adenocarcinoma | Female | 31 | ATCC | DMEM |
Media supplemented with 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). ATCC (American Type Culture Collection). DMEM (Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium) * Kindly provided by Dra. Luisa Lina Villa.