| Literature DB >> 33805801 |
Yu-Chieh Chiu1, Bo-Jen Chen2, Yen-Shuo Su2, Wen-Dar Huang1, Chang-Chang Chen3.
Abstract
Tea (Camellia sinensis), a globally cultivated beverage crop, is sensitive to drought, which can have an adverse effect on the yield and quality of tea. Azoxystrobin (AZ) is one kind of fungicide considered as an agent to relieve damage caused by stress. Initially, the response of tea plant to osmotic-gradient stress was evaluated using leaf disc assays with PEG-induced osmotic stress. The decline of the maximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm), actual photosynthetic efficiency of PS II (Y(II)), total chlorophylls, carotenoids, DPPH radical scavenging capacity, reducing power, total phenols, and the increase in MDA was observed in leaf discs treated with a gradient of PEG solutions (22.8, 33.2, 41.1% PEG, and blank). These results revealed that efficiency of photosystem II (PSII), photosynthetic pigments, and antioxidant ability in leaf discs were inhibited with an aggravated lipid peroxidation under PEG-induced osmotic stress, and indicated leaf disc assay with moderate PEG iso-osmotic condition would reflect a portion of tea plant response to drought stress. Therefore, the protective effect of AZ (0.125 and 1.25 g a.i. L-1) on tea plants suffering from drought was evaluated using leaf disc assays with 22.8% PEG iso-osmotic condition. Pretreatment of AZ (0.125 a.i. g L-1) reversed Fv/Fm, Y(II), DPPH radical scavenging capacity, and reducing power with reduced MDA in PEG-treated leaf discs, but photosynthetic pigments, total phenols, and ascorbate peroxidase activity were irresponsive to AZ. An Alleviated physiological damage in tea leaf with AZ applying was preliminarily revealed in this study. A Rapid screening of agents for tea plants against drought was developed to assist in the selection of protective agents.Entities:
Keywords: Camellia sinensis; azoxystrobin; chlorophyll fluorescence; leaf discs; osmotic stress
Year: 2021 PMID: 33805801 PMCID: PMC8001994 DOI: 10.3390/plants10030546
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1Chlorophyll fluorescence image (A) and leaf appearance correspond to Fv/Fm (B) value under PEG-induced osmotic stress during a 5-day period.
Figure 2Scatter plots and regression surfaces of the maximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm) (A), actual photosynthetic efficiency of PS II (Y(II)) (B), quantum yield of regulated energy dissipation (Y(NPQ)) (C), and quantum yield of non-regulated energy dissipation (Y(NO)) (D) value in tea leaf discs as affected by PEG-induced osmotic stress during a 5-day period.
Multiple regression models for Fv/Fm, Y(II), Y(NO), Y(NPQ), total chlorophyll (Chl), Chl a/b, Car, 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging capacity, MDA, total phenols, reducing power, and their root-mean-square error (root MSE), R2, and adjusted R2 (adj-R2).
| Effect | Regression Coefficient | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fv/Fm | Y(II) | Y(NO) | Y(NPQ) | Total Chl | Chl a/b | Car | DPPH Scavenging | Reducing Power | Total Phenols | MDA | |
| Intercept | 0.740 *** | 0.223 *** | 0.229 *** | 0.538 *** | 11.513 *** | 2.009 *** | 2.008 *** | 69.911 *** | 281.493 *** | 112.184 *** | 0.285 *** |
| d | 0.059 ** | 0.051 *** | 0.137 *** | −0.204 *** | 4.468 *** | 0.097 *** | 0.494 *** | 50.697 *** | 163.475 *** | 42.046 *** | −0.054 *** |
| D2 | 0.033 ** | - | 0.053 *** | −0.069 *** | 1.848 *** | 0.077*** | 0.229 *** | 20.964 *** | 66.495 *** | 18.553 *** | - |
| t | −0.008 * | −0.023 *** | 0.067 *** | −0.033 * | −0.452 *** | 0.005 NS | 0.098 ** | 5.409 * | 8.513 NS | 7.081 ** | 0.044 *** |
| t2 | - | - | −0.009 *** | 0.007 ** | - | - | −0.023 *** | −1.173 ** | −2.238 ** | −1.241 ** | −0.006 *** |
| dt | 0.051 *** | - | −0.069 *** | 0.063 *** | 0.456 *** | 0.047 *** | 0.108 *** | 4.390 *** | 8.642 *** | 5.547 *** | - |
| Root MSE | 0.037 | 0.033 | 0.051 | 0.052 | 0.613 | 0.034 | 0.119 | 6.815 | 14.879 | 7.774 | 0.028 |
| R2 | 0.936 | 0.715 | 0.914 | 0.828 | 0.940 | 0.902 | 0.909 | 0.915 | 0.942 | 0.883 | 0.743 |
| Adj-R2 | 0.933 | 0.710 | 0.910 | 0.819 | 0.937 | 0.897 | 0.904 | 0.909 | 0.938 | 0.876 | 0.733 |
d, linear effect of PEG-induced osmotic stress; d2, quadratic effect of PEG-induced osmotic stress; t, linear effect of days after treatment; t2, quadratic effect of days after treatment; dt, interaction effect. NS, not significant; *, p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
Figure 3Scatter plots and regression surfaces of total chlorophyll (A), Chl a/b ratio (B), and carotenoids (C) in tea leaf discs as affected by PEG-induced osmotic stress during a 5-day period.
Figure 4Scatter plots and regression surfaces of DPPH radical scavenging capacity (A), reducing power (B), total phenols (C), and MDA (D) content in tea leaf discs as affected by PEG-induced osmotic stress during a 5-day period.
Figure 5Chlorophyll fluorescence image (A) and leaf appearance correspond to Fv/Fm (B) value of tea leaf discs with pre-treatment (Pre-treat) of three different azoxystrobin (AZ) levels and then treated by blank solution (Blank) and PEG-induced osmotic stress (PEG), respectively.
Figure 6Change in the maximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm) (A), actual photosynthetic efficiency of PS II (Y(II)) (B), quantum yield of regulated energy dissipation (Y(NPQ)) (C), and quantum yield of non-regulated energy dissipation (Y(NO)) (D) value of tea leaf discs with pre-treatment (Pre-treat) of three different azoxystrobin (AZ) levels and then treated by blank solution (Blank) and PEG-induced osmotic stress (PEG), respectively. Values are the means (n = 5) with standard errors shown by vertical bars. Different letters (a–g) represent statistically different means (LSD, p < 0.05).
Change in total chlorophylls (Chl), Chl a/b, and carotenoids (Car) in tea leaf discs with pre-treatment (Pre-treat) of three different azoxystrobin (AZ) levels followed by treatment with a blank solution (Blank) and PEG-induced osmotic stress (PEG), respectively.
| AZ Conc. | Treatment | Total Chl | Chl a/b | Car |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No AZ | Pre-treat | 9.87 ± 0.43 a | 1.883 ± 0.005 cd | 1.71 ± 0.07 cd |
| Blank | 9.90 ± 0.38 a | 1.912 ± 0.011 ab | 1.95 ± 0.07 a | |
| PEG | 8.90 ± 0.35 cd | 1.807 ± 0.016 f | 1.97 ± 0.07 a | |
| 0.125 | Pre-treat | 9.45 ± 0.41 ab | 1.880 ± 0.012 de | 1.63 ± 0.05 d |
| Blank | 9.80 ± 0.31 a | 1.926 ± 0.007 a | 1.85 ± 0.08 b | |
| PEG | 8.43 ± 0.25 d | 1.790 ± 0.020 f | 1.68 ± 0.03 cd | |
| 1.25 | Pre-treat | 8.84 ± 0.38 cd | 1.861 ± 0.004 e | 1.54 ± 0.07 e |
| Blank | 9.16 ± 0.47 bc | 1.900 ± 0.011 bc | 1.74 ± 0.08 c | |
| PEG | 7.60 ± 0.21 e | 1.761 ± 0.021 g | 1.51 ± 0.05 e |
Within columns, means ± SE (n = 4) followed by the same letter are not significantly different, according to LSD (p < 0.05).
Figure 7Change in DPPH radical scavenging capacity (A), reducing power (B), total phenols (C), malondialdehyde (MDA) (D), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activity (E) of tea leaf discs with pre-treatment (Pre-treat) of three different azoxystrobin (AZ) levels and then treated with blank solution (Blank) and PEG-induced osmotic stress (PEG), respectively. Values are the means (n = 4) with standard errors shown by vertical bars. Different letters (a–g) represent statistically different means (LSD, p < 0.05).